• If you appreciate the VS Battles wiki, and can afford it, please make a donation to help keep our forum running, so we can continue to work hard to improve on the reliability of our wiki profile pages. If you want to be anonymous, don't enter your real name when you donate.

    Please click here if you are willing to help out.

Rule Violations Reports - 69

1,444
27
litterally only compart the sprites the character and villans are to diferent Figther is a guy who is obesionaded with swords Red mage is a munckin Black mage is a sociopath thief well steal alot and most of them are totally sociopath damn we can even say that the villans do less damage that the ligh warrios
 
15,426
2,070
The Wright Way said:
I think the fact that he's still arguing this is all the proof we need. I propose a one month ban.
Yeah, I agree a one month ban seems reasonable considering his behaviour.
 
1,444
27
Tllmbrg said:
drawn together use more that desings use alot of character 8BIT is licensed by being a diferent thing From FF also 8BIT use the materials from humor
8Bit literally uses FF sprits, like no changes just uses them like that
Drawn Together's desgins are their creation, they simply try to mimic the style of each property tehy're mocking with it Only 1 character isn't theirs and that's a public domain character at this point

literally is the only big similarity wit FF what is also wrong because most of the sprites are totally original
 
7,639
668
Livinmeme said:
litterally only compart the sprites the character and villans are to diferent Figther is a guy who is obesionaded with swords Red mage is a munckin Black mage is a sociopath thief well steal alot and most of them are totally sociopath damn we can even say that the villans do less damage that the ligh warrios
STOP.
 
7,639
668
Livinmeme said:
Ionliosite said:
The Wright Way said:
I think the fact that he's still arguing this is all the proof we need. I propose a one month ban.
Yeah, I agree a one month ban seems reasonable considering his behaviour.
can we discuse then decide if a ban or not
We have already discussed it over the course of a month. The answer is no, and it has always been. You have been rejected on god-knows how many threads and you were given every chance to stop.
 

Moritzva

VS Battles
Joke Battles
FC/OC Battles
Thread Moderator
Content Moderator
8,152
1,191
@Livinmeme -

Shut. Up.

Literally nobody can put this any nicer. You are a disruption, and you are disrailing the thread, and you have listened to zero warnings. In fact, due to your behavior on this thread showing zero willingness to change - no, you've doubled dow on this bullshit, I support a block. Definitely for the rest of the time until the forum shift.
 

Mr._Bambu

Lord of Dysphoria and Despondency
VS Battles
Sysop
Calculation Group
13,939
4,047
This is not a thread for discussing the legitimacy of a verse. Using this thread as such is a violation of its purpose, which is ironic considering which thread this is. This has continued for some time now. As per the statement in the OP of this thread, I am issuing a temporary ban of one week to Livinmeme to halt this discussion.

The rest of you, don't continue conversation. Talk over. Thank you for your time, continue to use this thread as-intended with as few derailments as possible.
 
Account was created today and only contributions involve commenting on dead threads revolving around Mario VS Sonic and how everyone "wanks" Dimentio and Mario with the Pure Hearts.

He claims that the threads he's commented on "just popped into his head".
 
4,410
1,040
I saw on his contributions and he only went in two threads in total, I don't think just because he necroed those two threads, means he is a sock of all things, just warn him to not necro threads
 
I agree, he seems innocent, just ignorant (don't mean that as an insult) of the rules of this Wiki. Somebody should just warn him that he should only Necro threads if there is sufficent reason to, and simply stating your opinion is not sufficent enough.

One should also inform him about how old a Thread must be before it is considered Necro, which I am actually not sure of, so if somebody could inform me as well that would be nice.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
17,631
7,908
I don't think there's enough evidence to suggest he's a sock, but I do agree he's suspicious. There's no reason to ban him just yet, but I do agree that he appears to have bad first impressions. It's not too far off from newcoming Naruto Vs Bleach debaters. Calling people wankers or downplayers in general is rude, and same with necro'ing topics just to rant about topics that have been discussed to death. But naivety in general is nothing punishable.

So for now, no punishments, but perhaps worth keeping an eye on them.
 
damage lock my thread because it is a stomp for Kaguya but it is in fun and games. lots of threads that are stomps are allowed there. it was for fun.

please demote damage.
 

The_Wright_Way

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
14,391
6,259
Potato4Head5 said:
damage lock my thread because it is a stomp for Kaguya but it is in fun and games. lots of threads that are stomps are allowed there. it was for fun.

please demote damage.
Link?
 
10,008
1,265
It's actually High 4-C Sully from Kingdom Hearts so might be fair, but yeah Beerus vs Kaguya on F&G should stay. It's F&G after all :p
 

AKM sama

rawr
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
Human Resources
7,818
5,732
Potato4Head5 said:
damage lock my thread because it is a stomp for Kaguya but it is in fun and games. lots of threads that are stomps are allowed there. it was for fun.

please demote damage.
You made a similar thread in vs threads board previously which was closed. Damage may have not noticed that your new thread was in F&G board. And he reopened it after noticing.

A new member asking for demoting Damage for such a small issue doesn't make for a good first impression and is kinda out of the ordinary. Just sayin.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,767
21,840
Damage just made a mistake. The fun and games thread should probably be reopened though.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,767
21,840
Okay. Thanks. Then we should stop arguing about this.
 
Damage3245 said:
I think it goes without saying that M3X is in the right here. Potato4Head5 looks like he is a problematic user.
you unfairly locked my thread and because i asked for u to be demoted now u are teaming up on me
 

M3X

4,675
965
Of course I didn't. I was arguing normally, I wrote some reasons for why Naruto can beat Saitama (Skill, hax and speed amp). He said Naruto doesn't have Shunshin (Stat amp, read his profile) that is a basic jutsu every ninja knows. He was ignoring the profile and my comments
 
7,639
668
I don't know if he's a troll. He seems to just be a new, mostly young user who doesn't know how the wiki works yet. Maybe a stern warning, but a block seems a bit extreme in this case.
 

Damage3245

VS Battles
Sysop
Calculation Group
13,811
3,608
ZephyrosOmega said:
I don't know if he's a troll. He seems to just be a new, mostly young user who doesn't know how the wiki works yet. Maybe a stern warning, but a block seems a bit extreme in this case.
Considering the nature of their posts on this thread alone, I'm not entirely willing to extend them the benefit of the doubt. A temporary ban would be fine with me.
 

DarkGrath

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
3,647
1,850
This feels like a bit of an overreaction. He's not done anything here that's seriously ban worthy; he's just showing that he doesn't really understand stuff. It's easy to tell that he's just confused, and the actions he's done as a result are only questionably bannable anyway.

I'll let people more directly involved choose, but I honestly don't think this justifies more than a stern warning. If he is getting blocked, this shouldn't justify more than a few weeks.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,767
21,840
I personally agree with DarkGrath. A ban seems too harsh, especially now that we are in the middle of moving forums. Would somebody be willing to lift the account and IP blocks and give him a stern warning and instructions instead?
 
Hello? I finished writing a Kirby "thread" that I promised would be really good compared to my previous ones and that I was writing when I got restricted. Anyone can ask me how to find it, as I published it outside this site.
 
932
463
Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan said:
I don't understand what you mean.
He's saying he was writing a Kirby thread prior to his ban and finished. He can't post it himself right now, so he's asking if someone could evaluate it. If they think it's good and not the same repetitive points, he asking then if he can post it.
 
5,344
913
He's also completely unrepentant about it despite advice and numerous warning from other users, even ignoring the tiering system in some of said matches.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,767
21,840
Is some staff member willing to give him a strict warning to stop or get banned?
 
PlozAlcachaz said:
Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan said:
I don't understand what you mean.
He's saying he was writing a Kirby thread prior to his ban and finished. He can't post it himself right now, so he's asking if someone could evaluate it. If they think it's good and not the same repetitive points, he asking then if he can post it.
Thank you for clarifying my message; now, I have to clarify something else:

I only repeat non-refuted arguments and only when others prove to have forgotten them.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
17,631
7,908
If he's a blatant troll who also came here from ComicVine, I suppose we don't need any users like that around.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,767
21,840
Is somebody in the staff willing to give him a strict warning?
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,767
21,840
Are you certain. It will likely result in yourself not receiving an email invitation to our new forum, as you had too few posts April 14. It seems better if you switch to the old account instead.
 
Antvasima said:
Are you certain. It will likely result in yourself not receiving an email invitation to our new forum, as you had too few posts April 14. It seems better if you switch to the old account instead.
yes I certain how do I make a new account on the new forum then
 
Antvasima said:
Are you certain. It will likely result in yourself not receiving an email invitation to our new forum, as you had too few posts April 14. It seems better if you switch to the old account instead.
no im not switing back and fourth I abandod the account
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,767
21,840
You will not be able to join the new forum nearly as easily unless you switch back.

Also, please stop quoting me several times.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,767
21,840
Thank you for helping out, but for safety reasons you should preferably not use WHAM except against the kind of trolls that spam porn and gore.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
17,631
7,908
I sent Hypergogeta a strong warning as suggested above, he's made the 2nd thread and has apparently been permabanned from other websites, so I don't really trust him. But gave him a final warning just in case.
 

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
102,767
21,840
What do the rest of you think? Given the forum move, this might be a bad time to ban him. Should we forbid him from creating any more versus threads instead?
 
2,109
299
He likely made them because it doesn't matter, the Threads will be yeeted with the Forum move anyway. But it's just my speculation.

I'd say ignoring warnings still deserves them some kind of actions.

I'm fine with forbidding him from making Versus Threads. Banning is too hard for them, from what I see.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
17,631
7,908
I agree that telling him not to make Vs Threads would be better than banning him if he hasn't said anything super malicious.
 
Top