• Important information regarding upcoming advertisements in this forum.

    Please click here for further information.
  • After Fandom's UCP update, galleries that had advanced and unconventional coding are no longer working properly.

    Please click here if you are willing to help out with fixing this problem.

Rule Violations Reports - 69

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
Please report any rule violations in this thread. Notifying us of such incidents is highly appreciated.

Additionally, kindly report any sockpuppets that you come across.

Only report violations regarding the wiki rules. False reports due to personal vendettas are unacceptable.

Also, this thread should be for reporting actual rule-breaking, not every single little disagreement.

In cases of extreme vandalism or trolling, you can report the accounts at the VSTF wiki.

If blocked members create sockpuppet accounts to circumvent their block repetitively, or several are created at almost the same time, you may contact the Fandom Staff, to politely request permanent range IP blocks.

You can also find specific users with the Search Function by typing with the format: "User:Username"

Here is a useful page for discovering sockpuppet accounts: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Log/newusers

Notes:

All staff members, kindly follow and bookmark this thread.

Remember to inform members via their message walls if that you have reported them here, in case they have performed severe enough rule-violations to risk being blocked. However, this should only be used in uncertain cases, not if they have done something instantly ban worthy, or if their offenses are minor.

It is against the Fandom rules to upload any offensive images to the wiki, so in order to show screencapture evidence of extremely bad behaviour, you must use external sites, such as Gyazo or Imgur, in order to not get globally banned yourself by the higher-ups:

https://gyazo.com

https://imgur.com/

https://pasteboard.co

Do not derail the Rule Violation Threads with irrelevant nonsense or internal disputes. It is solely for making serious, warranted reports of violations of the Site, Discussio, and Editing Rules, and not for discussion or side comments. Such posts should preferably be removed by the staff, and if a member continues to derail after being repeatedly told to stop, this will result in a temporary ban.

Given the extreme levels of systematic harrassment towards this community, kindly remember to not share/post any evidence of malware or child abuse publicly in order to prevent unwillful distribution. Submit any evidence of child abuse and severe systematic threats to the police.

If something goes outside the jurisdiction of the VS Battles wiki bureaucrats, or even the global Fandom staff, you need to report it personally to the authorities.

Also, absolutely do not click on any random links from suspicious users. You could potentially access content that contains dangerous malware or illegal types of pornography, alternately tracks your IP address and location. If you are uncertain, please use this page to verify that the links are not dangerous.

However, do not feed the trolls by discussing their behaviour here, as they get excited and motivated by any form of attention. Strictly report them to the staff, who then block them and mass-delete their contributions.

If there are genuine serious problems with the behaviour of certain staff members, do not cause drama by extensively arguing about it here, but rather contact the Human Resources Group.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
Continued from here: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/4234479
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:GreenCya

So, Green is back from being banned. And he is being the exact same, I get being new here. But after being told why these are blatant fallacies and shouldn't be brought up many times, as well as creating/bumping many stomp matches, It's pretty clear he won't change.

Oh, he also made a CRT for a feat he got informed about many of times why it shouldn't be upgraded

He's clearly not learning, he needs to be banned.

At the very least, ban him from The Amazing World of Gumball discussions like Earl and Latinguy.

(I put this on the last one, but the time was spent to discuss punishing Latin Guy)
 
5,194
1,558
Aww my comment got deleted.

Anyway why did he get unbanned? I think he just used it as an advantage to cause trouble imo.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
16,747
7,045
Personally, I think GreenCyan could get one last final warning. He has at one point made a sock to get around the ban; which I permabanned the sock and extended his main account to 3 months with a final warning that his ban will be permanent if he does that again. He hasn't made a sock, but he's still repeating the same stuff he's gotten warnings and short bans for. His individual actions aren't even that malicious, more so he has the mind set of a naive child who doesn't understand the basics of indexing or the context of whether or not something actually becomes an outlier. With the sock being the only extreme example.

Anyway, I left him a final warning.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
We always do that when we reach over 400 posts, as it gives us some time to react and link to the continuation threads, and a marginal in case of sudden troll attacks.
 
@Latin.

Your links is the RVR about how long the ban should be and this thing trying to defend yourself.

Also, trying to imply that it was "Only" disagreed with is a stretch, in reality, it's constant downplay using refuted arguments which is constantly getting on everyone's nerves, you were told to stop with these because the staff were tired of refuting the same arguments for the 7th time, but you didn't stop and tried to continue. That's why you got banned from nintendo threads.
 
@ I'm Blue daba dee daba die... First paragraph: I don't get your point.

Second paragraph: a) Only some of my arguments were actually refuted, and I've even made corrected versions of most of the refuted ones.

b) So, this has occurred because others just don't want to read what they don't like, and I wasn't even banned, only restricted.

c) Oh, and speaking of refuted arguments, here.

- Also, what you said here is a straw man, as my argument isn't "They're that tier because of low-end moments" but actually "They're that tier because of official revelations and general content."

- So, you're the one with the bad arguments.
 
8,951
3,121
I wasn't even banned, only restricted.

Banned = banned from the site as a whole.

Restricted = not allowed to be in threads about a certain topic, with a ban ensuing if you don't comply.
 
What a nice attempt to avoid admitting your mistakes.

And everything I'm saying is pertinent to that restriction, which shouldn't have occurred.
 
I essentially got restricted because "I was constantly making bad arguments" and that's what Blue and others were doing, so I have the right to say it.
 

MrKingOfNegativity

Abstract embodiment of being undesirable
VS Battles
Sysop
9,711
4,062
The point has already been settled quite some time ago, and continuing the argument is accomplishing nothing. So no, you don't.

Furthermore, comments like "I apparently managed to teach X not to look at the sawdust in another person's eye." and "What a nice attempt to avoid admitting your mistakes." are nothing but barbed, passive-aggressive drivel that helps no one and does nothing to further the point you claim you're trying to make. Even if your point is valid, that kind of snarky nonsense doesn't belong in this thread and you should keep it to yourself.

Now, I'm giving you a chance to either take this dispute somewhere else or drop it entirely. Pick one and do so.
 
8,951
3,121
You didn't get restricted for "constantly making bad arguments", but for "repeatedly making CRTs on the same topics that got unanimously rejected".
 
@MrKingOfNegativity: The point was settled for a reason that also applies to those who debated me, so yes, I do... Barbed, passive-agressive drivel? Ok, I'll only say one more thing below.

@Agnaa: They rejected them precisely because they found the arguments wrong.

Everybody have a good day.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
16,747
7,045
@Everyone, can we all stop spamming the RVR thread? We really don't want to set yet another record of having more threads being refreshed in one year than we had throughout the previous years put together like 2019 did. The last two threads filled up literally in less than 4 days.

That being said, I agree with Mr King of Negativity that derailing the thread with "Sawdust in their eye" leaves a massive plank in the speaker's eye. Now anyway, please stop arguing on the RVR thread or we'll need to hakai more posts and possibly take action to those who continue to derail. Message Walls are here for a reason.
 

DarkGrath

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
3,617
1,793
That user has been on several related threads and has been relentless with this behaviour on all of them. I'd support a temporary ban, since he's been warned about it on these threads already.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
I do not mind. He keeps spamming incoherent comments in Portuguese, despite being told not to.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
I already gave him a final warning though, and he seems to have stopped for the moment.
 
I've been ignoring this, but something probably needs to be done about Supreme of the Universe. I know things can get pretty heated around here, but he keeps joining threads that include DC characters, only to talk about how DC sucks and insist the franchise is 1-C at best and top tiers like Lucifer are 2-C, despite many people telling him repeatedly they are ranked differently here. When others disagree with him, he occasionally calls them "dumbasses," "dumb fanboys," or insults things like their weight and personal looks (not that he has any way of knowing those things). Apparently, the mods have already warned twice about his behavior, but he shows no signs of stopping and has been pretty consistent with it.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
So should we ban him then? And if so, for how long? Or is a final warning enough?
 
I am not experienced in handling rule violations like this, but from my perspective, it seems quite unlikely that another warning will do any good. He has been officially warned twice now and unofficially warned many more times by various users. It seems like it should be obvious to avoid those kinds of remarks anyway. Nobody would speak that way in public. As far as bans are concerned, I am equally unclear on the precident for punishing this kind of behavior. I just thought it was something that needed to be dealt with.
 
4,601
752
Based on personal exerience of what he's been doing on some thread, a ban seems necessary. He's already been warned multiple times and continues to harass people and assert that DC can't be higher than 2-C on any thread that involves the top-tiers. Not to mention how he either calls people fanboys, accuses people of having never read comic books and generally ignores people's suggestions of making a CRT if he doesn't agree with our ratings.

As for duration, I'm not sure a perma-ban is necessary but maybe two weeks would be enough for him to learn his lesson. This is what I think at least.
 
Yes, the fact he seems to be targeting DC threads is also disturbing since he's admitted multiple times now that he thinks DC sucks. Most of the threads in his edit history are DC related and involve him randomly stepping in to talk about how DC is 2-C at best and "gets stomped." I find it hard to see that as anything other than attempting to derail and sabatoge a series he dislikes at this point.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
16,747
7,045
I blocked Supreme for 2 weeks based on the above suggestions. As as for AntMonitor, would a warning or short block be better?
 

Mr._Bambu

Narcissistic Cannibal
VS Battles
Sysop
Calculation Group
13,774
3,913
Warning, for now, inform him that such behavior is unacceptable and continued childishness will result in a short ban. If he has legitimate points concerning this Hecate character, it is fine to share them in a way that doesn't insult/degrade/belittle other members. If he can be productive with his points, he should be free to bring them forward regardless of topic. Make it clear that the issue is attacking others, not the reason for which he's done so.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
16,747
7,045
I'm to busy to right out a warning ATM, so if another staff member is up to it. Could that be taken care if via message wall for AntMonitor.
 

Super_Saiyan_God_Julian

Herald of the Julianforce
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Sysop
Thread Moderator
4,157
1,342
Should the warning be given in Portuguese? He seems to understand what the thread was about, but i'm not sure.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
I gave AntMonitor a warning earlier today, but not on his message wall. The linked post that he made seems to have been made before I issued the warning though.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
He did use characters in the same tier, so he seems to be trying to adapt to our conventions. A warning seems exaggerated for something like that. An explanation is fine though.
 

Super_Saiyan_God_Julian

Herald of the Julianforce
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Sysop
Thread Moderator
4,157
1,342
Yeah he seems to be improving at least. A reminder that he needs to check how high in a tier a character is compared to another before making a match should be enough.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
That only seems to warrant a mild warning/instruction not to do so again.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
Okay. A stricter warning then. A ban is an overreaction in any case.
 

DarkGrath

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
3,617
1,793
I imagine a strict warning would work here, since he's not actively malicious from what I can tell. Just generally being a persistent bother. If he brings up the topic again, that'd likely call for further action.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
100,346
21,049
Okay. Thank you for the help.

Is somebody else willing to talk with Livinmeme?
 
14,860
1,820
I severely doubt he has any arguments but the ones that were already debunked on both threads this happened + Agnaa's wall, but go ahead.
 
1,444
26
Zouken said:
Yes, we do give people a chance to explain themselves.
i was do the theread of 8BIT before the web move but zachary trie to derrail the thread also agnaa triing to close the thread when himself admit that he don´t know the standars of fan fiction and that he was specullating
 
1,444
26
Ionliosite said:
I severely doubt he has any arguments but the ones that were already debunked on both threads this happened + Agnaa's wall, but go ahead.
you know that agnaa was specullating and that he don´t read the thread and only literally see the sprites
 
14,860
1,820
Zach didn't derail the thread. You started the thread saying it was "for a random verse", then Zach asked if it was about 8-Bit, which you hid for over 100 posts until we pulled the truth from you, and even now you admit it was about it all along.
 

Jaften

Joke Battles
Thread Moderator
505
70
Ionliosite said:
Zach didn't derail the thread. You started the thread saying it was "for a random verse", then Zach asked if it was about 8-Bit, which you hid for over 100 posts until we pulled the truth from you, and even now you admit it was about it all along.
Technically he said it was just a "random question" but none of us were fooled at all because it of a suspiciously specific example.
 
1,444
26
Ionliosite said:
That's irrelevant because not only Agnaa, but people raging from Wok, to Weekly, to Schnee, to Moritzva, to Elizhaa all said the verse wasn't allowed.
who that people don´t know that verse and was leaning in the arguments of agnaa
 
1,444
26
okay let see first arguments then ban

drawn together is allowed because is a parody 8BIT also his but is considered a abrigaded series who don´t make any sense at all

RvB is valid becuase they sell merchandise also 8BIT but is not allowed

SCP XKCD etc use copygrith material but is okay because is for expanding is cosmology 8BIT don´t even use a little of FF to expand cosmology but is wrong
 
8,951
3,121
Drawn Together is allowed because it has its own characters and assets that merely allude to superheroes like Superman in design/behaviour.

RvB is allowed because it's officially licensed by Microsoft (the rights holders of the assets they use).

SCP and XKCD are allowed because their use of copyrighted material is in referential humor (i.e. they'd mention a book that they used on an SCP in an experiment), they don't have copyrighted characters as regular characters in the text.

8BIT is a webcomic whose 4 main characters have the same name and sprite as characters from FF, while also having multiple villains similarly ripped from FF.
 
950
113
Livinmeme said:
okay let see first arguments then ban
drawn together is allowed because is a parody 8BIT also his but is considered a abrigaded series who don´t make any sense at all

RvB is valid becuase they sell merchandise also 8BIT but is not allowed

SCP XKCD etc use copygrith material but is okay because is for expanding is cosmology 8BIT don´t even use a little of FF to expand cosmology but is wrong
Drawn Together deosn't have sprits of the things is parodies, also like the plot is completely orignal

RvB has been discussed already, drop it dude

Tf is SCP XKCD and who uses it for what?
 
1,444
26
Agnaa said:
Drawn Together is allowed because it has its own characters and assets that merely allude to superheroes like Superman in design/behaviour.
RvB is allowed because it's officially licensed by Microsoft.

SCP and XKCD are allowed because their use of copyrighted material is in referential humor (i.e. they'd mention a book that they used on an SCP in an experiment), they don't have copyrighted characters as regular characters in the text.

8BIT is a webcomic whose 4 main characters have the same name and sprite as characters from FF, while also having multiple villains similarly ripped from FF.
drawn together use more that desings use alot of character 8BIT is licensed by being a diferent thing From FF also 8BIT use the materials from humor
 
1,444
26
Tllmbrg said:
Livinmeme said:
okay let see first arguments then ban
drawn together is allowed because is a parody 8BIT also his but is considered a abrigaded series who don´t make any sense at all

RvB is valid becuase they sell merchandise also 8BIT but is not allowed

SCP XKCD etc use copygrith material but is okay because is for expanding is cosmology 8BIT don´t even use a little of FF to expand cosmology but is wrong
stuff
8BIT has a totally diferent story that FF like Drawn together Plus he is licensed so yeah
 
6,832
557
Here. Go here if you are THATLivinmeme said:
Agnaa said:
Drawn Together is allowed because it has its own characters and assets that merely allude to superheroes like Superman in design/behaviour.
RvB is allowed because it's officially licensed by Microsoft.

SCP and XKCD are allowed because their use of copyrighted material is in referential humor (i.e. they'd mention a book that they used on an SCP in an experiment), they don't have copyrighted characters as regular characters in the text.

8BIT is a webcomic whose 4 main characters have the same name and sprite as characters from FF, while also having multiple villains similarly ripped from FF.
drawn together use more that desings use alot of character 8BIT is licensed by being a diferent thing From FF also 8BIT use the materials from humor
Stop talking about 8-Bit Theater.

https://fcoc-vs-battles.fandom.com/wiki/8-Bit_Theater

HERE. Go here if you are THAT insistent on making pages and make them there instead where they Already have pages.
 
950
113
drawn together use more that desings use alot of character 8BIT is licensed by being a diferent thing From FF also 8BIT use the materials from humor

8Bit literally uses FF sprits, like no changes just uses them like that Drawn Together's desgins are their creation, they simply try to mimic the style of each property tehy're mocking with it Only 1 character isn't theirs and that's a public domain character at this point
 
Top