• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violations Reports - 69

Status
Not open for further replies.

Antvasima

Maintenance worker
He/Him
VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
164,613
71,093
Please report any rule violations in this thread. Notifying us of such incidents is highly appreciated.

Additionally, kindly report any sockpuppets that you come across.

Only report violations regarding the wiki rules. False reports due to personal vendettas are unacceptable.

Also, this thread should be for reporting actual rule-breaking, not every single little disagreement.

In cases of extreme vandalism or trolling, you can report the accounts at the VSTF wiki.

If blocked members create sockpuppet accounts to circumvent their block repetitively, or several are created at almost the same time, you may contact the Fandom Staff, to politely request permanent range IP blocks.

You can also find specific users with the Search Function by typing with the format: "User:Username"

Here is a useful page for discovering sockpuppet accounts: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Log/newusers

Notes:

All staff members, kindly follow and bookmark this thread.

Remember to inform members via their message walls if that you have reported them here, in case they have performed severe enough rule-violations to risk being blocked. However, this should only be used in uncertain cases, not if they have done something instantly ban worthy, or if their offenses are minor.

It is against the Fandom rules to upload any offensive images to the wiki, so in order to show screencapture evidence of extremely bad behaviour, you must use external sites, such as Gyazo or Imgur, in order to not get globally banned yourself by the higher-ups:

https://gyazo.com

https://imgur.com/

https://pasteboard.co

Do not derail the Rule Violation Threads with irrelevant nonsense or internal disputes. It is solely for making serious, warranted reports of violations of the Site, Discussio, and Editing Rules, and not for discussion or side comments. Such posts should preferably be removed by the staff, and if a member continues to derail after being repeatedly told to stop, this will result in a temporary ban.

Given the extreme levels of systematic harrassment towards this community, kindly remember to not share/post any evidence of malware or child abuse publicly in order to prevent unwillful distribution. Submit any evidence of child abuse and severe systematic threats to the police.

If something goes outside the jurisdiction of the VS Battles wiki bureaucrats, or even the global Fandom staff, you need to report it personally to the authorities.

Also, absolutely do not click on any random links from suspicious users. You could potentially access content that contains dangerous malware or illegal types of pornography, alternately tracks your IP address and location. If you are uncertain, please use this page to verify that the links are not dangerous.

However, do not feed the trolls by discussing their behaviour here, as they get excited and motivated by any form of attention. Strictly report them to the staff, who then block them and mass-delete their contributions.

If there are genuine serious problems with the behaviour of certain staff members, do not cause drama by extensively arguing about it here, but rather contact the Human Resources Group.
 
Continued from here: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/4234479
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:GreenCya

So, Green is back from being banned. And he is being the exact same, I get being new here. But after being told why these are blatant fallacies and shouldn't be brought up many times, as well as creating/bumping many stomp matches, It's pretty clear he won't change.

Oh, he also made a CRT for a feat he got informed about many of times why it shouldn't be upgraded

He's clearly not learning, he needs to be banned.

At the very least, ban him from The Amazing World of Gumball discussions like Earl and Latinguy.

(I put this on the last one, but the time was spent to discuss punishing Latin Guy)
 
Aww my comment got deleted.

Anyway why did he get unbanned? I think he just used it as an advantage to cause trouble imo.
 
Personally, I think GreenCyan could get one last final warning. He has at one point made a sock to get around the ban; which I permabanned the sock and extended his main account to 3 months with a final warning that his ban will be permanent if he does that again. He hasn't made a sock, but he's still repeating the same stuff he's gotten warnings and short bans for. His individual actions aren't even that malicious, more so he has the mind set of a naive child who doesn't understand the basics of indexing or the context of whether or not something actually becomes an outlier. With the sock being the only extreme example.

Anyway, I left him a final warning.
 
Thank you for helping out.
 
We always do that when we reach over 400 posts, as it gives us some time to react and link to the continuation threads, and a marginal in case of sudden troll attacks.
 
@Latin.

Your links is the RVR about how long the ban should be and this thing trying to defend yourself.

Also, trying to imply that it was "Only" disagreed with is a stretch, in reality, it's constant downplay using refuted arguments which is constantly getting on everyone's nerves, you were told to stop with these because the staff were tired of refuting the same arguments for the 7th time, but you didn't stop and tried to continue. That's why you got banned from nintendo threads.
 
@ I'm Blue daba dee daba die... First paragraph: I don't get your point.

Second paragraph: a) Only some of my arguments were actually refuted, and I've even made corrected versions of most of the refuted ones.

b) So, this has occurred because others just don't want to read what they don't like, and I wasn't even banned, only restricted.

c) Oh, and speaking of refuted arguments, here.

- Also, what you said here is a straw man, as my argument isn't "They're that tier because of low-end moments" but actually "They're that tier because of official revelations and general content."

- So, you're the one with the bad arguments.
 
I wasn't even banned, only restricted.

Banned = banned from the site as a whole.

Restricted = not allowed to be in threads about a certain topic, with a ban ensuing if you don't comply.
 
What a nice attempt to avoid admitting your mistakes.

And everything I'm saying is pertinent to that restriction, which shouldn't have occurred.
 
I essentially got restricted because "I was constantly making bad arguments" and that's what Blue and others were doing, so I have the right to say it.
 
The point has already been settled quite some time ago, and continuing the argument is accomplishing nothing. So no, you don't.

Furthermore, comments like "I apparently managed to teach X not to look at the sawdust in another person's eye." and "What a nice attempt to avoid admitting your mistakes." are nothing but barbed, passive-aggressive drivel that helps no one and does nothing to further the point you claim you're trying to make. Even if your point is valid, that kind of snarky nonsense doesn't belong in this thread and you should keep it to yourself.

Now, I'm giving you a chance to either take this dispute somewhere else or drop it entirely. Pick one and do so.
 
You didn't get restricted for "constantly making bad arguments", but for "repeatedly making CRTs on the same topics that got unanimously rejected".
 
@MrKingOfNegativity: The point was settled for a reason that also applies to those who debated me, so yes, I do... Barbed, passive-agressive drivel? Ok, I'll only say one more thing below.

@Agnaa: They rejected them precisely because they found the arguments wrong.

Everybody have a good day.
 
@Everyone, can we all stop spamming the RVR thread? We really don't want to set yet another record of having more threads being refreshed in one year than we had throughout the previous years put together like 2019 did. The last two threads filled up literally in less than 4 days.

That being said, I agree with Mr King of Negativity that derailing the thread with "Sawdust in their eye" leaves a massive plank in the speaker's eye. Now anyway, please stop arguing on the RVR thread or we'll need to hakai more posts and possibly take action to those who continue to derail. Message Walls are here for a reason.
 
That user has been on several related threads and has been relentless with this behaviour on all of them. I'd support a temporary ban, since he's been warned about it on these threads already.
 
I do not mind. He keeps spamming incoherent comments in Portuguese, despite being told not to.
 
I already gave him a final warning though, and he seems to have stopped for the moment.
 
I've been ignoring this, but something probably needs to be done about Supreme of the Universe. I know things can get pretty heated around here, but he keeps joining threads that include DC characters, only to talk about how DC sucks and insist the franchise is 1-C at best and top tiers like Lucifer are 2-C, despite many people telling him repeatedly they are ranked differently here. When others disagree with him, he occasionally calls them "dumbasses," "dumb fanboys," or insults things like their weight and personal looks (not that he has any way of knowing those things). Apparently, the mods have already warned twice about his behavior, but he shows no signs of stopping and has been pretty consistent with it.
 
So should we ban him then? And if so, for how long? Or is a final warning enough?
 
I am not experienced in handling rule violations like this, but from my perspective, it seems quite unlikely that another warning will do any good. He has been officially warned twice now and unofficially warned many more times by various users. It seems like it should be obvious to avoid those kinds of remarks anyway. Nobody would speak that way in public. As far as bans are concerned, I am equally unclear on the precident for punishing this kind of behavior. I just thought it was something that needed to be dealt with.
 
Based on personal exerience of what he's been doing on some thread, a ban seems necessary. He's already been warned multiple times and continues to harass people and assert that DC can't be higher than 2-C on any thread that involves the top-tiers. Not to mention how he either calls people fanboys, accuses people of having never read comic books and generally ignores people's suggestions of making a CRT if he doesn't agree with our ratings.

As for duration, I'm not sure a perma-ban is necessary but maybe two weeks would be enough for him to learn his lesson. This is what I think at least.
 
Yes, the fact he seems to be targeting DC threads is also disturbing since he's admitted multiple times now that he thinks DC sucks. Most of the threads in his edit history are DC related and involve him randomly stepping in to talk about how DC is 2-C at best and "gets stomped." I find it hard to see that as anything other than attempting to derail and sabatoge a series he dislikes at this point.
 
I blocked Supreme for 2 weeks based on the above suggestions. As as for AntMonitor, would a warning or short block be better?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top