- 15,273
- 7,006
Ye. I'll try something in DMs.Would another elaborate apology help to mitigate the hurt feelings here?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ye. I'll try something in DMs.Would another elaborate apology help to mitigate the hurt feelings here?
I haven't got any complaints about the pixel scaling for my accepted calculations as far as I remember, so I think they should be... fine at least?We uh. We probably should go through pretty much all of your calculations, though, if you've just been reading straight up the wrong thing for pixel count this entire time.
Though maybe I can do this instead of changing the app I'm used to do pixel scaling with.As someone who uses almost just MS Paint for calcs, I think that's mainly just the fact that the user didn't know about these values being how far the line stretches across the ordinate and abscissa, with the real lenght being got through the Pythagorean Theorem.
Thus, if the line is "100 x 56", then the true lenght is sqrt((100^2) + (56^2)) or around 114.61 px.
Perhaps not, but evidently you haven't known how to do it all this time. Mistakes happen, so it needs looking into.I haven't got any complaints about the pixel scaling for my accepted calculations as far as I remember, so I think they should be... fine at least?
Though maybe I can do this instead of changing the app I'm used to do pixel scaling with.
Within the first few posts, it was already delving into very questionable territory. Keeping it closed is simply the prudent thing to do.Can this be reopened? This just seems like paranoia and i put sfw in title. I'm also making sure people don't go out of line with what they say. Otherwise I'll have to think he just closed it because he broke up (is a joke) with me out of spite
What are your top 3, 5 or 10 worst secrets? I'll go first (sfw)
1. In high school I skipped school one day. It was probably freshman year or sophomore. My uncle is pretty scary so I decided I'll just let him think I left but I never did. I had to go to the bathroom super bad so Pee'd on the floor, got it up best I could, then let my dog loose inside house to...vsbattles.com
Apologies, I am now aware of the fact that it is a rule violation to use a blatantly NSFW image as a profile banner. I hope this will become common knowledge among VSBW users so that nobody would be hypothetically subjected to degenerate material such as, say, a 14 year old's ass in lingerie. I think we could all agree that such a hypothetical scenario would be unacceptable and would require such an image to be removed immediately.
her nipples are on full display.
These things are so drastically apart, come on.oh shit oh fuckkkkk how'd that get here lol
I think most people - most sane people, anyways - would much rather look at lesbian sex between consenting adults than a sexualized child. Neither belong here, of course, but only one appears to be getting nuked at the moment. Fact of the matter is people hate looking at AKM's banner, they have a very good reason for that discomfort, yet it's somehow still around. Fix it.These things are so drastically apart, come on.
We aren't here to discuss the ethics of aging up in art, what we are discussing is the difference between what is at least clothed rear focus versus a woman getting fingered on main with nothing left to the imagination. Let's try to not obfuscate.I think most people - most sane people, anyways - would much rather look at lesbian sex between consenting adults than a sexualized child.
Full disclosure I'm one of the people that strongly wants AKM to change his banner, but this is utter trite lolI think most people - most sane people, anyways - would much rather look at lesbian sex between consenting adults than a sexualized child. Neither belong here, of course, but only one appears to be getting nuked at the moment. Fact of the matter is people hate looking at AKM's banner, they have a very good reason for that discomfort, yet it's somehow still around. Fix it.
Was done the moment I saw the report. So we're halfway done with changing banners that need to be changed.It doesn't matter what the issue is with AKM's banner. Change the banner.
None of this is going to change the fact that people are almost universally uncomfortable with it and the solution is so goddamn simple that we wouldn't have to be doing any of this if a single person actually gave enough of a shit to tell AKM maybe he shouldn't be ass blasting people with his banner on a site used by minors. Wasn't particularly hard to tell me to tone it down. What, did he threaten to demote yall if you asked him to not be horny on main?
Was done the moment I saw the report. So we're halfway done with changing banners that need to be changed.
Yes. Thank you for being reasonable.Good to hear. Report over, everyone go back to your villain lairs and prepare your next villainous deed, see you next time.
I told you to stop habitually causing drama. DarkGrath is already preparing a staff thread.Cool. See you in staff discussion in 20ish minutes, then.
Characters making out is more controversial than adult characters in revealing dresses, but for the record I would personally prefer if AKM changes the image, but I won't condemn him with extremely exaggerated accusations either.The fact that there's even ambiguity over this is concerning. I've got a lot of yuri that's unmistakably NSFW but also involves fully clothed characters, I don't think that would've gone over well, either.
I didn't really know what thread to bring this up in, but it felt right to address it here. This isn't really a report, so I apologize in advanced and ask Staff and HR that you humor me. This is being touted as precedent, but I don't see it codified on the site rules.Since she was fully aware of this rule.
- It is important to underline that we do not tolerate extreme misandrism any more than we tolerate extreme misogynism, and that the same goes for Christophobia, antisemitism, Islamophobia, anti-Hinduism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, and all forms of racism and supremacism, etcetera. Basically that the rules are the same for everybody in this regard.
Good to hear. Report over, everyone go back to your villain lairs and prepare your next villainous deed, see you next time.
There is no way that Fujiwara did not know that the banner they uploaded was inappropriate. They deliberately changed it to something inappropriate in order to make a point regarding their feelings towards AKM's own banner.Apologies, I am now aware of the fact that it is a rule violation to use a blatantly NSFW image as a profile banner. I hope this will become common knowledge among VSBW users so that nobody would be hypothetically subjected to degenerate material such as, say, a 14 year old's ass in lingerie. I think we could all agree that such a hypothetical scenario would be unacceptable and would require such an image to be removed immediately.
Fujiwara has previously been banned twice this year, for 2 weeks and for 1 month. I don't think the punishment should necessarily exceed either of those ban lengths. So between 2 to 4 weeks is my recommendation.An actionable suggestion. I do not strictly disagree. It is not her first time doing this, least of all in recent times. The pot stirring is by all accounts becoming more frequent rather than less. What do you propose in terms of length?
An interesting suggestion. Why not exceed, specifically? I am not opposed to that constraint, either- but I am curious as to why, as normally we'd take the opposite reading if we hand out a ban, that it should be higher if prior bans are not really impactful or learned from.Fujiwara has previously been banned twice this year, for 2 weeks and for 1 month. I don't think the punishment should necessarily exceed either of those ban lengths. So between 2 to 4 weeks is my recommendation.
I may be wrong on this but I don't this current report is related in any way to the offenses that Fujiwara previously had, so it's not a case of Fujiwara repeating mistakes or breaking the same rules, but causing a new rule violation.An interesting suggestion. Why not exceed, specifically? I am not opposed to that constraint, either- but I am curious as to why, as normally we'd take the opposite reading if we hand out a ban, that it should be higher if prior bans are not really impactful or learned from.