- 4,604
- 6,575
Sounds good.Okay. Permanent bans with the right to appeal one of them via a Community Central wiki message wall after one year then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds good.Okay. Permanent bans with the right to appeal one of them via a Community Central wiki message wall after one year then?
There is only an overlap between Vapourrrrr and MysticCarnage, not with Cloudyagami/Steezstifler.If Cloud and Vapourrr were different people, pretty sure that the first thing they would have said is that they're friends within the same household or that they're brothers. Both of which are common excuses of sharing the same IP Address albeit not an impossible excuse but we often at least demand evidence to higher up staff if that is the case. And usually that's preferred if statements were made before IP Address overlap was founded.
But he's just saying they aren't the same and not offering good explanations for the IP Address overlap. Which leans me to believe they are the same guy.
Cloud and Vapourrrrr do not have the same IP address. This was clarified above. Mystic and Vapourrrrr had the same IP address, whom Vapourrrrr already confessed to being.If Cloud and Vapourrr were different people, pretty sure that the first thing they would have said is that they're friends within the same household or that they're brothers. Both of which are common excuses of sharing the same IP Address albeit not an impossible excuse but we often at least demand evidence to higher up staff if that is the case. And usually that's preferred if statements were made before IP Address overlap was founded.
But he's just saying they aren't the same and not offering good explanations for the IP Address overlap. Which leans me to believe they are the same guy.
Nvm then, the proposal for what was decided of permabans and an offer to appeal one of them after a year is good.There is only an overlap between Vapourrrrr and MysticCarnage, not with Cloudyagami/Steezstifler.
Antvasima said:Not as far as I can tell, no, but they may of course just have hidden their tracks well.I wonder if @MysticCarnage and @Vapourrrrr are related somehow, as after Vapourrrrr got banned on Jun 27, MysticCarnage joined the forum on the same day. Both of them also exhibit similar behaviors. Is this just a coincidence….
I'm very prone to wanting every detail of a situation cleared up. There's a few hanging threads here that still strike me - like the inconsistency with the IP addresses and the question of why Vapourrrrr would have tried to get their own alt unbanned while already on the wiki. I appreciate your efforts in investigating the matter.He also went as far as making multiple discord accounts for each of his personas, and even asked Dread for MysticCarnage's discord, so he's willingly to go to considerable length to obfuscate his shared identities. I think she should take this into consideration.
Literally asked Dread to reach out to himself, ask for his own alternate discord, to throw us off the trail. Worth nothing that all 4 accounts have different discord accounts linked to their fandom. So he's also creating new discords for this purpose. Apparently the Vapour discord is from 2021 so either he has a bunch of accounts in reserve or he's getting new ones somehow.
I can vouch, yes.He also went as far as making multiple discord accounts for each of his personas, and even asked Dread for MysticCarnage's discord, so he's willingly to go to considerable length to obfuscate his shared identities. I think she should take this into consideration.
He did also appeal on MysticCarnage's behalf as well here as soon has his Vapourrrrr account got unbanned, so it's not out of the questions for him to advocate for Cloud's unbanning as well.the question of why Vapourrrrr would have tried to get their own alt unbanned while already on the wiki.
Frankly, not even going to entertain this. We are not gullible enough to think someone who posts their debate opponent's IRL face on a forum in an argument is acting in good faith.First, another banned member wants to make an appeal for leniency:
What do you think?
This individual took a personal pic of Deagon and used it in an attempt to openly mock him because he disagreed with em. Not dissimilar to certain users taking the pfp of a staff member and using them because that's funny apparently, but this absolutely takes it a step further.First, another banned member wants to make an appeal for leniency:
Antvasima
vsbattles.fandom.com
What do you think?
Ahh, the guy that made his profile picture a picture of my real life face? I am going to vote no:First, another banned member wants to make an appeal for leniency:
Antvasima
vsbattles.fandom.com
What do you think?
Okay so, I am RoggerReggor, wouldn't reveal the name which I used previously on this wiki with a different device.
No, they do not register as being the same people.The obvious first thing to do is to ask whether any of those users share IP addresses with each other or anyone else noted so far.
@Antvasima , could you take a look?
Okay. Never mind then. I will ban them in our wiki as well.Frankly, not even going to entertain this. We are not gullible enough to think someone who posts their debate opponent's IRL face on a forum in an argument is acting in good faith.
I understand, but the fact that he made his account literally the same day that Cloud was banned (Apr 22, 2023), and then proceeded to troll about the exact same verse and admits to using the wiki on a different account and different advice strongly suggests to me it's the same person. At some point the coincidences become too extreme. But that is just my opinion on it, I won't force it if others disagree.No, they do not register as being the same people.
I don't blame you. All we've done is run an IP check - that can confirm whether two people are the same, but it can't disprove it. This warrants further discussion, though preferably one focused and specific to each individual user.I understand, but the fact that he made his account literally the same day that Cloud was banned (Apr 22, 2023), and then proceeded to troll about the exact same verse and admits to using the wiki on a different account and different advice strongly suggests to me it's the same person. At some point the coincidences become too extreme. But that is just my opinion on it, I won't force it if others disagree.
I really doubt Viott is Vapourrrr, I talked with him on discord and to me they are completely different people, Viott doesn't have the same behavior Vapourrrr has when you disagree with him, he is very chill and he doesn't argues for hours with CGMs, even the english/words they uses are different for example Viott is the only one that say "achievement" instead of "feat" and Vapourrr never used that word, Viott also helped me with a calc for The Boxer, Vapourrrr would have never done it considering our relationship on the wiki, Viott also said to me on discord that he doesn't think Mikey is supersonic+ when both Vapourrrr and Mysticarnage have the same thoughts about TR, Viott also doesn't seem to have a forum account/he doesn't use it much since he wasn't aware about the staff only TR thread and Vapourrrr was.Viott
Made his account in May 2023, has a linked discord, exchanged wall posts with both Vapour and akasakelucilfer, made calcs for TR and Lookism and advocated on behalf of one of Vapour's calcs.
To bump the message, so people don't miss it.No, they do not register as being the same people.
I'll reiterate that IP checks can prove if two users are the same person, but they can't disprove it. The same person can use multiple IP addresses, and doing so is a common method of circumventing IP bans. I requested an IP check only as a first step - we still need to discuss this further.Ant have said that they don't overlap IP addresses. So the discussion is done and can be moved on.
Not quite, Dread. A lack of IP overlap doesn't disprove people being the same. There is still the fact that a) RoggerReggor openly admitted to being an alt, b) Said he is using a new device for the new account, c) Started his account the same day Cloud was banned, and d) Proceeded to behave precisely the same way that Cloud did, being aggressive and stubborn on TokyoRevengers threads, so much so that he got banned for it.Ant have said that they don't overlap IP addresses. So the discussion is done and can be moved on. Pattern coincidences are never equivalent to evidence and Deagonx acknowledged this
Agreed. This discussion should be continued privately imo.Let's end this discussion until more evidence is available.
I've seen more than a few cases where he argued for upgrades, but regardless, this will be continued in private so as to not clutter this thread perpetually.But he is another person who attempts to downgrade TR.
Reporting @Kirinator07 for multiple edits performed to SCP profiles without the creation of a correlating CRT, along with the creation of (to my knowledge) at least one profile that breaks our standards, examples of this being:
Multiple changes to 096's page that start from this point
Multiple changes to 0001's page that start from this point
Multiple changes to 3930's page that start from this point
Multiple changes to 106's page that start from this point
Created this profile which violates our cross-scaling rules in the linked key
And many more changes that have taken place that I feel not the need to list as this should get the point across, but many more changes can be seen in his edit history.
Of note is that Kirinator has been warned for such activity multiple times in the past, and while some of these edits have taken place before said warning, these edits have also extended far past the point those warnings have been given along with having not been reverted, along with those warnings being given for changes related to the stats of the character rather than the P&A as can be seen here.
Other members of the SCP revisions team can likely also bring up issues with Kirinator if they see it necessary.
This issue has still yet to be resolved.Kirinator07: He's been warned loads, and even reported, for similar behaviour in the past. I've now chronicled them in the warning tracker, but even those may not be all since he's repeatedly deleted staff instructions.
Since those instructions seemingly haven't done much, I'd suggest either a short ban to stress the seriousness, or a ban on editing pages until further notice.
Yeah, I agree with the others; uploading their opponent's IRL face without permission and with the intention of mockery is an absolute no go around her. I'd say keep them banned.First, another banned member wants to make an appeal for leniency:
Antvasima
vsbattles.fandom.com
What do you think?
Tell Glass to back off, not me. He's been targeting me for years and im tired of it.Weekly is acting like a bit of an ass in this thread for some reason, insulting Glass for no real reason here, here, and here, as well as refusing to back down.
Normally this isn't super notable but I figured I'd bring it up since Weekly has been on thin ice for a while now iirc. Maybe a warning to cool it for a bit would suffice, although last I checked he's still not backing down on this for some reason.
Pretty clear shitflinging, so I'd support a warning.
1. Glass did not do anything worth reporting.Tell Glass to back off, not me. He's been targeting me for years and im tired of it.
Weekly, no one is targeting you in this instance. You like certain verses. Glass likes certain verses. Those interests sometimes overlap. You hate each-other. That is all there is to it. That does not mean you get to lose your shit over it.Tell Glass to back off, not me. He's been targeting me for years and im tired of it.
Actually do not. I've repeated it multiple times: staff reports are not for the RVR.Make a separate report for Glass if you can find posts where he acted inappropriately.