• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

I'm reporting @Marshadow29 for breaking his topic ban. He posted in the current Nasu CRT in Staff threads. It should be noted that on Marshadow's message wall, Mr. Bambu informed him that the topic ban would last until August 3rd 2023. While it is two days before the thread ban is up, it should be noted that Marshadow has been warned about the topic ban and evading it.
to add to this, he had commented prior on the thread, but that comment was deleted
 
I'm reporting @Marshadow29 for breaking his topic ban. He posted in the current Nasu CRT in Staff threads. It should be noted that on Marshadow's message wall, Mr. Bambu informed him that the topic ban would last until August 3rd 2023. While it is two days before the thread ban is up, it should be noted that Marshadow has been warned about the topic ban and evading it.
The last time I posted in a type-moon thread was around may 1st. as of yesterday, the 3 month time-limit had been met.
 
and just to clarify, 3 months is 90 days ,correct?
it has been a 90 day gap since then, or exactly 3 months. i adhered to my 3 month ban, no issue
Let me quote Bambu's post directly.

This is an official advisory: you have been topic banned from any and all threads relating to Nasuverse until August 3rd, 2023, as discussed here

There is no room for debate here. You were directly told August 3rd.
 
Let me quote Bambu's post directly.

This is an official advisory: you have been topic banned from any and all threads relating to Nasuverse until August 3rd, 2023, as discussed here

There is no room for debate here. You were directly told August 3rd.
my official ban was voted for 3 months. the 3 month period is over.
 
it was voted upon that my ban would be 3 months,or a 90 day period. a 92-93 day period would be incorrect, as a month is commonly defined as a 30 day period, correct?
 
This is not a debate. The ban lasts until the day that the admin implementing it says, which in this case was August 3rd. There is no wiggle room here whatsoever, as it directly says August 3rd on your wall. Stop commenting here, it is a waste of everyone's time as you are definitively wrong on this.
 
This is not a debate. The ban lasts until the day that the admin implementing it says, which in this case was August 3rd. There is no wiggle room here whatsoever, as it directly says August 3rd on your wall. Stop commenting here, it is a waste of everyone's time as you are definitively wrong on this.
that would be a small oversight on bambu's part as im sure no one here voted for 3 months and a few days
 
Given your obstinacy on this subject, cluttering up the RVR with this argumentation that your ban should end earlier than what an Admin directly told you, and the fact that you violated your topic ban twice during the period of the ban, I am persuaded to advocate that your topic ban should be extended.
 
Marshadow was given a specific date at which their topic ban expired (that is, August 3rd, two days from now). This is very silly behavior when you were given an exact date at which your topic ban would be up, I really don't get why you're making this more difficult than it is. I would not personally push for an extension of a topic ban but I do agree that it is a reasonable response to the above.

What sort of extension would you want, Deagon?
 
According to the same user, he said he asked Maverick_Zero_X permission to post. Although I'm pretty sure Maverik doesn't know about the topic ban and gave him permission, and because of that, he thought it was fine to post.

But I can not find on Maverik's message wall the post where the permission was given.
While the topic is done, for full transparency, I had asked Maverick about this in private couple hours ago. Maverick confirmed to me they indeed gave them permission to comment once.

However, Marshadow made a second (now deleted) comment in that thread without permission.

Edit: Nvm, I was mistaken about the second comment.
 
I didn't remember this user at first, but based on what ImmortalDread listed Knowzn listed (Especially the quote I made and if I responded that way) then I might as well agree to keep him banned. As for the "Alternate accounts" I do not remember on queue what his alt accounts were, but AKM or Antvasima would be needed for double checking on that.

Plus, Bambu's thoughts about this popping up when we're barely awake is might thoughts exactly.
Okay sorry for bringing this up again despite a resolution already being reached but I feel like this information shouldn't go ignored. Steezstifler was not his only alt.
He also used akasakelulcifer as an alternative account even after he was banned.
Ant even banned him for being a sock puppet of ClownYagami.

So yea he's used at least 2 alts and continued to make threads with another even after being banned on the forums.
 
Vapourrrrr: As I initially advocated extending that ban to 2 months, and this return days after the end of that 1 month ban hasn't inspired much confidence, I'd support banning him until the end of the month.

Marshadow: I agree with the topic ban extension after the obstinate behaviour here. Instead of initially seeking clarity, they dug their heels in after being given a clear answer. Without that I would've seen it as a mistake and let it slide, but that reaction doesn't bode well for good behaviour in threads.
 
Vapourrrrr: As I initially advocated extending that ban to 2 months, and this return days after the end of that 1 month ban hasn't inspired much confidence, I'd support banning him until the end of the month.

Marshadow: I agree with the topic ban extension after the obstinate behaviour here. Instead of initially seeking clarity, they dug their heels in after being given a clear answer. Without that I would've seen it as a mistake and let it slide, but that reaction doesn't bode well for good behaviour in threads.
For what exactly ?

You advocated me getting banned for "stealth CRT'S" but you gave no proof as to why you believed I made a stealth CRT, I severely disagree with a 2 month ban especially because I don't believe I made a stealth CRT, and if I don't believe I made a stealth CRT you also shouldn't
 
No, the extension to two months was for creating a sockpuppet after you were banned and using it to send annoyed messages at a user of the wiki.

Creating sockpuppets to get around bans is against the rules.
It wasn't to get around a ban, it was too message ANTVASIMA, although that did happen I would like to make it clear I'm sorry, banning me for another month is just un needed though, I get that its against the rules but really 1 month is a long time and it's not like I have gotten worse since then, I've been pretty active and haven't went to any TR CRTS because I learned from my mistakes and know I get angry when I debate in those threads

Pls don't ban me
 
Well, I don't mind that Vapourrrrr created an extra account specifically only to message me without any subterfuge involved, but he hasn't behaved well in other ways after he returned and needs to shape up his rather childish behaviour quite a lot.

Maybe a warning would be sufficient?
 
As I said, the issue isn't that Vapourrrr used the alt to message you, it's that he used the alt to send annoyed messages at the person who reported him.

While this is admittedly a minor use for a sockpuppet, it is still one, which is why I suggested a 1 month extension to the ban, rather than the more typical permaban.

John: Left a warning on their wall.
 
As I said, the issue isn't that Vapourrrr used the alt to message you, it's that he used the alt to send annoyed messages at the person who reported him.

While this is admittedly a minor use for a sockpuppet, it is still one, which is why I suggested a 1 month extension to the ban, rather than the more typical permaban.

John: Left a warning on their wall.
I say a one month ban is very much warranted. This borders on trolling if nothing else.
 
I say a one month ban is very much warranted. This borders on trolling if nothing else.
How is it trolling, I didn’t even do anything wrong, you guys are so overly strict with no reasoning

I got one month because of a stealth CRT, you didn’t give sufficient proof though, you guys don’t realise how long a month is, it’s a long ahh time, rethink this, ANT usually suggests the best things here and honestly I think you guys are severely mis judging my case especially since you can’t even prove my “stealth CRTS”
 
As I said, the issue isn't that Vapourrrr used the alt to message you, it's that he used the alt to send annoyed messages at the person who reported him.

While this is admittedly a minor use for a sockpuppet, it is still one, which is why I suggested a 1 month extension to the ban, rather than the more typical permaban.

John: Left a warning on their wall.
I agree with this proposal yes.
 
Back
Top