This seems like a reasonable request.
Is somebody willing to provide quotes and links to the relevant posts please?
So to save everyone the time, I took the liberty of only bringing the relevant stuff.
Starting off,
this is fujiwara's summary of the staff consensus in the thread.
My report is in relation to "
Removal of Resistance to Order by resisting Time Stop" specifically in which fujiwara claims that 2 staff were in favor of the removal (Deagonx & Glassman).
Firstly, this agreement was in relation to her
summary of the topics being discussed. However, the agreement she received was not in relation to removing "
Resistance to Order by resisting Order". The two staff only reached this consensus regarding time stop specifically not Order. This is basically Vote Manipulation. She's claiming she received permission to remove CM and Law resistance by resisting Order when in fact, she only received permission based on Time Stop specifically. The heading of the summary shows this and Anos Resistance was based on both Order and Time Stop. An ability with multiple justifications cannot be removed merely by discrediting only one of them.
A second case of Vote Manipulation being—I might be wrong since I had to skim through the thread— she never received any agreement from TheGlassman12 regarding this specifically. She took glass agreement on a different topic and is claiming he agreed to this specifically. On going through the thread, I only found Deagonx
agreement on the matter and he agreed specifically to removing
Resistance to Order based on Time Stop not removing
Resistance to Order based on resisting Order.
Deagonx
reasoning on this is made pure and simple
I don't believe that Order being the source of your power means that every instantiation of your abilities should be interpreted as an "Order" based effect, wherein the concept itself must be resisted/overcome in order to defeat any given ability that a God uses. I understand your argument, but I don't see it that way, personally.
He doesn't believe X being the source of Y requires a resistance to X in order overcome Y however, the resistance in question is based on two things, one of which is a direct instance of
resisting X of which it's removal was never even discussed not to mention agreed on in the first place.
So once again, my report of dishonest edits stands and now possibly 2 cases of vote Manipulation have been added on top of it.