Their Cthulhu Mythos thread can be closed (https://vsbattles.com/threads/cthulhu-mythos-content-revision-downgrade.153388/) by their request.
It's crass certainly but it doesn't seem to be overtly offensive in any way I can gather.
Lindsay may have apologised here:
I can unban them if you wish.
I mean? Others like Georr and Klol were not easy either. Also, KLOL always declare opposing comments as irrelevant and derailing which happens to me as well. I don't get his way of debate if he can't leave this passive aggressiveness in the posts.
Insulting you was his only offense, idk why he suddenly said that outta nowhere (malicious intent or whatever) and I am pretty sure that he hasn't done it before but if he has apologized, he may can be given a second chance with a strict warning to shape up his behavior and not joke around randomly?
I don't think we should allow this person to come back, they entered a thread on an important topic, only to derail it with completely random and unwarranted insults towards Ant, who hasn't even said anything controversial during the entire thread.
I am not sure. I do not think that we should keep blatantly toxic members.
Well, calling him "vermin" is not acceptable in any case.
While I don't intend to defend his actions, I believe that completely banning him may not be the most effective solution, considering his ongoing frustrations with Klol and Georr. Personally, I have managed to handle the situation and maintain respect to the best of my ability, but not everyone may be capable of doing so.
Schrodinger's Asshole.
They were solely doing it intentionally and personal. Simply leave them banned since they were also trying to abuse your quick forgiveness habit in the message wall. I mean, it ain't no way, that can be a joke. He is full aware, that he will get banned for that.
Because Nostredam's arguments were legitimately horrible in every facet imaginable, when even Planck says they're pure BS you know something's up. They were tenfold worse than the arguments you were making.
I honestly don't get why you of all people would see it like that, given that none of the profanities were targeted at anyone as an insult, given that they solely targeted the logic of the arguments in the thread. This is literally how many of us talk here on this server and we don't take offense to it ourselves, and there was no name-calling on my part either.
Man was legitimately stonewalling with irrelevant points that went above and beyond against the entire point of the CRT and had some really hilariously bad takes that logically and narratively make no sense with regards to the context of the franchise. I don't get how you can say this considering all of that.
Yes, and here I thought I could make him see reason. Guess not.
Once again, I will lay it out loud, I absolutely did not name-call anyone in that thread, nor was I using my profanity or directly targeting it at anyone, I was targeting it solely at the logic of some of the arguments and even going out of my way to explain why they were wrong, and I really don't get what you find so passive-aggressive about them, this is literally the way I talk and how many other staff members here talk, you get used to it. However, when direct name-calling and insults did take place in that thread, I went out of my way to warn both sides not to push it.
As for this particular comment, I disagree, he was frustrating us more with his arguments that were not at all relevant to the OP at hand and were covering aspects that heavily contradicted the contextual and narrative intent of the game's events at hand that no longer even tackled OP, even Planck of all people had to point out to him that his takes were asinine.
Which in matter of fact, your personal opinion of people's argument quality is irrelevant. You were doing this to me, and you were doing to any opposing side.
Because this is not the first time, you were literally involved in the previous heated arguments months ago, and we had the same literal discussion, you literally have an issue with dealing opposing side without involving some salty personal takes (Your argument is garbage, Ay I can't handle the guy)
No he was not. All his comments were related to the cosmology, to verse and supporting his arguments. You are not the one who choose to decide if opposing sides seems to be derailing.
You were, Klol, you have absolutely no idea how hard we can debate if you use this aggressive provocative tone in debates.
Which is perfectly fine, you are the only supporter who is fair, but your passive-aggressive tone can be improved.
There were, I was literally off my limits when he always calls other people's argument garbage, or not related or derailing. I am being complete honest and open, the person was fine till he got those type of insults.
I never said Klol do this intentionally, but I am saying this is the reason why people have no patience to deal with someone who is constantly calling their arguments' garbage.
Very well.Planck69 seems to make sense above. Let's drop the issue please.
That said, we should all try to be polite and respectful to each other, yes.
They are now perm-banned from Bambu.
Noted, and thanks.
Not sure about the former, but for Nostredam, CloverDragon, DarkDragonMedeus and Planck seem to agree on a ban, and Bambu himself doesn't seem keen to entertain Nostredam either based on his above comments.
Nostredam has apparently quit the wiki altogether and won't defend himself or respond to any further comments anymore as per his own words, but...
I know I'm not a staff member but after reading through the threads, I think it needs to be said that it's highly suspicions that @Nostredam joined the Wiki very recently then immediately posts downgrade (decently formatted) CRTs for well known popular verses and/or opposes upgrades for them (DBS, GoW, CM, etc), is antagonistic/provocative to the verse supporters, has a quite disturbing profile banner, insults the Wiki yet is very familiar with it's the standards and in the end doesn't really care for the consequences of his actions like they've got nothing to lose.
- Message from LephyrTheRevanchist
I don't know what warning he gave me, but he didn't give me any warning, he told me to get everyone together to post all arguments, so that it can be read for every topic, and we decided to let this topic go, because the arguments were not very good when it was imposed and there were already 3 team members in favor, later we were going to do another one and there is also the side of we don't understand Japanese to see if it's right, so we left this CRT aside, because it would not harm anything, I don't know why you mentioned it my name, since it has nothing to do with me.
Weren't the arguments good and why didn't they respond? The staff members looked at the OP and agreed. If the arguments were bad, it wouldn't even be accepted, because it would be easily refuted. You guys had all the time in the world to refute the topic, but you guys only started to respond right at the end and prefer to open another topic than to answer the already opened one.
And yet they used this type of message that does not refute anything.
Anything, just ask him, since he was already participating in the topic, for example, asking if it would be better to use the literal or not. But nobody did that, he passed almost unnoticed by the topic.
I used you as an example. If you want, I can remove everything that bears your name and leave it as anonymous phrases.
I think it's better to remove me from this, don't use me as an example, because your context is all wrong, it was after I said that I would no longer participate in this CRT and would create my own topic that he started to treat me badly, please stop tagging me without my permission as I had nothing to contribute to him getting this ignorant attitude about people.
- Message from LephyrTheRevanchist
