Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,574
- 11,561
No, I meant in this thread. Also, I did show it, multiple times.Staff consensus was resisting CM and Law based on resisting Time stop is invalid. You have zero consensus on the rest, if so show it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I meant in this thread. Also, I did show it, multiple times.Staff consensus was resisting CM and Law based on resisting Time stop is invalid. You have zero consensus on the rest, if so show it
What’s the profile in question? If an edit war’s going on I’ll just lock it after Fuji’s edits are applied.Just mentioning that I've yet again reverted Tatsumi's edits. The staff consensus is that my edits are fine to stay, so cut it out.
What’s the profile in question? If an edit war’s going on I’ll just lock it after Fuji’s edits are applied.
You showed their consensus based on the time stop. Show their consensus regarding thisNo, I meant in this thread. Also, I did show it, multiple times.
Yes and support a blatant infringement of rulesWhat’s the profile in question? If an edit war’s going on I’ll just lock it after Fuji’s edits are applied.
That was thoroughly discussed in the thread and also rejected.You showed their consensus based on the time stop. Show their consensus regarding this
Just asking question, isn't it required to create a downgrade thread for removing something from the profile?Very cool, that means she's got leave to edit it in.
No.Just asking question, isn't it required to create a downgrade thread for removing something from the profile?
I see. Thx for telling I didn't know about itNo.
It was an accepted in a thread, end of story. Learn how to let things go already.
Bring up where it was rejected or call the staff themselves. You're using their rejection of time stop to claim it was rejected which isn't the same thing especially since what was resisted is made clearThat was thoroughly discussed in the thread and also rejected.
I haven't reverted anything again though. I'm not a child.@Tatsumi504 dude stop with the reverts, you're only making yourself look worse here by trying to gatekeep what's allowed to change or not for MG.
I haven't reverted anything again though. I'm not a child.
Girl I've reverted only 2 edits. Pull up anything else I've done. I dare you, I double dare you.
I'm tempted to report you in turn for how dishonest this all is.
The edit itself is wrong. The profiles justification is multiple things and only one was agreed to be removed. How are y'all not getting this?Can we please stop bombarding the RVR with off topic comments? Anyway, Fuji didn't do anything wrong in editing the profile.
No, honestly I'm chill. I said that cause glass has already advised me to stop and I replied I haven't done so again even before the advice. She then sends that like I'm in some editing war and still reverting edits.Not with that "i dare you, i double dare you" tone and the paragraphs below after it
Anyway imma leave now but clearly all you did here only make the matter worse on you
Very cool, that means she's got leave to edit it in.
Can we please stop bombarding the RVR with off topic comments? Anyway, Fuji didn't do anything wrong in editing the profile.
This seems like a reasonable request.Ask her to send evidence of staff consensus being the removal of the entire thing.
Also, I still need staff comments about thIs issue.Well, maybe a two or three months ban would be enough for Lindsay? And a one month ban for Nostredam? Or would that be too lenient?
My OP was trying to give Anos Law Manipulation and CM type 1 resistance based on Order of timeThis seems like a reasonable request.
Is somebody willing to provide quotes and links to the relevant posts please?
It's like saying Just because water manipulation of a character got rejected in a thread just remove fire manipulation which is already accepted in another thread. Meanwhile both are different things.
Both of those suggested ban times seem fine to me.Also, I still need staff comments about thIs issue.
I commented on this thread yesterday, Ant, I assure you I have not forgotten of its existence in less than 24 hours.Also, I still need staff comments about thIs issue.
So to save everyone the time, I took the liberty of only bringing the relevant stuff.This seems like a reasonable request.
Is somebody willing to provide quotes and links to the relevant posts please?
He doesn't believe X being the source of Y requires a resistance to X in order overcome Y however, the resistance in question is based on two things, one of which is a direct instance of resisting X of which it's removal was never even discussed not to mention agreed on in the first place.I don't believe that Order being the source of your power means that every instantiation of your abilities should be interpreted as an "Order" based effect, wherein the concept itself must be resisted/overcome in order to defeat any given ability that a God uses. I understand your argument, but I don't see it that way, personally.
Normal users can't ping@Antvasima I am sorry brother, but can you explain to me why it was justifiable banning this specific user?
Issue it's that Sans015 on their Fandom account have "Thunder" as their secondary name, which is Godly's old Discord nick.
I will ask AKM again.@Antvasima I am sorry brother, but can you explain to me why it was justifiable banning this specific user?
Not yet, Tatsumi felt like he hasn't made it clear that what this report is about and so, he has organised a detailed post to explain it's not as easy as "CRT has been accepted and changes has been applied as per" and wish it to be properly evaluated rather than concluding things with Hasty Generalisation.Has the situation with Tatsumi and Elde cleared up yet?
No wait, I don't even need the Discord (I even checked back and they seem to have deleted the old account, how unfortunate).
On this old calculation made from Charmander, we see the following line:
You can get it by this point, but obviously, people don't use it. Luckily, I have the game, so I'll do it myself.
And guess the name of the YT channel? Thunder, just like Sans015 on their Fandom acc!
I don't want to hear anymore excuses from Sans, it's blatantly him at this point.
Edit: Linking this in case he decides to change the names:
Edit 2: Looks like I had old screens.
I collected some more evidence from some Discord conversations, and... it's just blatantly him. The old Thunder account has Cinderace in pfp just like Charmander in the new one. I can't see how more blatant it gets.
Mind Evaluating this.Yes, thank you for helping out, StrymULTRA.
I am not sure. Did Deagonx and Theglassman12 confirm here that they accepted Fujiwara's changes?
They didn't.I am not sure. Did Deagonx and Theglassman12 confirm here that they accepted Fujiwara's changes?
I am not sure. Did Deagonx and Theglassman12 confirm here that they accepted Fujiwara's changes?
It seems best to call all of the staff members who evaluated the thread in question to comment here.
@Deagonx @Theglassman12They didn't.
Ant tag bambu or other staffs. Really this things needs to be escalated.
Thread was about Resistance based on Concept of time not about what was in the profile and I dare Fuji to show the proof for Glass or Daegon accepting to Remove the Other abilities without a Downgrade CRT.