- 8,443
- 8,897
This user applied this very questionable edit that contained no CRTs, I've already undid the edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you show me? This is pretty serioushe's also gotten much worse as of late. He's recently become a suicide encourager on a wide variety of places I have heard.
That last part is so accusatory for no reason dude, could you not?Can you show me? This is pretty serious, and I wouldn't be surprised if you're lying
DDM was also being accusatory, but ok I removed itThat last part is so accusatory for no reason dude, could you not?
Did you just ignore the fact that I literally said that I reported his comment years ago and that I don't even know if it exists anymore? I didn't bother taking a screenshot because the guy had already been permabanned by the time I even decided to take a peek on his Reddit profile, and reporting that comment is what allowed me to block the dude on Reddit in the first place.Can you show me? This is pretty serious
I didn't read your reply when I commented thatDid you just ignore the fact that I literally said that I reported his comment years ago and that I don't even know if it exists anymore? I didn't bother taking a screenshot because the guy had already been permabanned by the time I even decided to take a peek on his Reddit profile, and reporting that comment is what allowed be to block the dude in the first place.
Some people just wanna watch the world burnFunny how people throw the word bias and we go from telling Speed not to do it again, to a 1 year ban in vsthreads. If we're going to have principles stick to it. That's all i really gotta say.
Key words are "I have heard". Meaning I've mostly heard "here say" from a variety of people and haven't seen many myself. But I trust KLOL and I usually stay away from Reddit and 4Chan and other likewise communities since a lot of them have historically had quite a bit of sub communities that approached "Deep dark web" status. And he's still guilty of other offenses that are still permaban worthy regardless.Can you show me? This is pretty serious
Exactly I didn’t even do anything wrong this time except being a bad debater and being “biased” in threads that I haven’t made. When there are others their doing the exact same thingFunny how people throw the word bias and we go from telling Speed not to do it again, to a 1 year ban in vsthreads. If we're going to have principles stick to it. That's all i really gotta say.
It technically is a place to complain just saying since it’s a RVROh so you missed all the recent reports I guess, since I specifically said that isn’t the main issue
Anyways, the RVR isn’t where you complain.
No, the RVT is for bringing up rule violations.It technically is a place to complain just saying since it’s a RVR
I gave him a warning earlier:This user applied this very questionable edit that contained no CRTs, I've already undid the edit
Anyway, are the other staff members here fine with this conclusion?I am personally fine with a 6 months duration, since it is a new area that he has messed up in, and it isn't intentional.
Fine by meAnyway, are the other staff members here fine with this conclusion?
A 6 months hiatus from participating in versus threads in this forum that is.
That means I can’t make any although I haven’t made any spite or stomp matches?Okay. We will go with that then, given the long above discussion.
@speedster352 :
You are not allowed to participate in versus threads here for the next 6 months. Please try to improve on your behaviour and common sense that are required for such discussions in the meantime, as otherwise we will likely have to forbid you from participating for even longer afterward the ban time runs out.
Regardless of having not made any since your last VS Thread ban, your behavior in VS Threads (both in threads you've made and in threads made by others) has warranted thisThat means I can’t make any although I haven’t made any spite or stomp matches?
I shouldn't comment on this but you don't seem to understand why you are being banned again. You were warned and banned previously for your general behavior in vs threads and for making spites and stomps matches, now as I said previously you apparently have not made any stomps or spites and you seem to complain why you are being banned if you have not, the reason (you don't seem to understand it) is that your attitude in vs debate is terrible, you say you are not good in debates, so the best thing you should do is to take a break and try to improve your attitude, etc. Hopefully this ban will help you improve in that regard. That's what I wanted to say, and this may sound a bit rude although I don't mean to be rude, take it well, stop with the "I'll leave this wiki after this or that" antics kinda annoying, you're not an 8 year old kid. Goodbye.That means I can’t make any although I haven’t made any spite or stomp matches?
"Hey, hey, you shouldn't use the word" is not a punishment. People have been punished, banned for mentioning the word once, you know that, you literally agreed with it. Yet, they even clarify that they've said the word more than once. These, Damage, are double-standards at their finest.Antvasima was the one who edited the post and he gave a warning to QuasiYuri on the same thread.
Probably should be warned or banned for a short time for intentionally bypassing the filter, indicating that there's an understanding that this is something that will get them in trouble from FANDOM if said beyond it generally being inappropriate.
The user themselves has been around for years and from the looks of things has only been reported once for posting a broken NSFW link upon request of another user, so it isn't clear that they are trolling.
I'll let others deliberate as to how strong of a punishment should be given.
looking at the report, the user only had 1 report prior for posting a broken nsfw link in their span of a year on the site. And they didnt even use the word in a targeted sense, just said it, whilst i don't know how Yuri said it, using context clues its probably in this sentence "when this is already too much for lazy-ass here." between lazy ass and here. Which if the case yeah, that is pretty targeted."Hey, hey, you shouldn't use the word" is not a punishment. People have been punished, banned for mentioning the word once, you know that, you literally agreed with it. Yet, they even clarify that they've said the word more than once. These, Damage, are double-standards at their finest.
This is verifiable by any mods who can see edits, and Damage's lack of pushback should be evidence enough. Unfortunately, this was an N-bomb, bypassing the filter, even.I'm not going to say anything but this.
I can recall multiple staff agree they should be treated the same as blue names when it comes to rule violations, if it was an N-bomb, then we treat it as such, if it was another word, we treat it however its been treated elsewhere.
If there was once, we would have done everything in our power to shut it down. But no, mods, regular members, and staff in general gets the same treatment when it comes to rule violationAre there rules that say mods can just get a warning for that?
Ant's very blatant knowledge and lack of appropriate reaction on this word being used by Yuri implies they're getting a pass. Ant saw it, edited it, deleted a person's comment calling it out, and just left a slight warning for something he'd ban people over if it was someone else.Nobody has said yet on the thread that QuasiYuri should get a pass.
^Ant's very blatant knowledge and lack of appropriate reaction on this word being used by Yuri implies they're getting a pass. Ant saw it, edited it, deleted a person's comment calling it out, and just left a slight warning for something he'd ban people over if it was someone else.
That's a pass, it does not matter if it was said or not.
This is allowed?deleted a person's comment calling it out
Even mentioning it with no malicious intent got a person banned for 3 months, I don't think a stricter warning would suffice honestly...Would simply giving them a stricter warning suffice here? There was no malicious intent.
No. If you are going to place a three-month on someone else with Ant explicitly stating “it was not used as an insult”, then the same should be reciprocated.Would simply giving them a stricter warning suffice here? There was no malicious intent.