-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 12,085
- 2,096
Loli **** as an avi
- 12,085
- 2,096
1. Zachary had a chance to appeal in September IF he had good behaviour
2. TGOP is due to fandom, I don't think they will be okay with unbanning him for a while though.
- 167,681
- 76,260
- Thread starter
- #4,525
Oh. That is obviously very extreme, which is unfortunate, given that I think that he was mostly harmless preceding that incident. I don't think that he was globally blocked though, as he contacted me via Community Central afterwards.
- 3,191
- 3,444
Somebody did this. It's a small thing, but I'm not entirely sure what they're trying to do.
- 21,468
- 30,790
- 31,209
- 27,406
I've locked the page.
- 6,900
- 8,043
The user who did this has no other edits so he's either a troll or just a new user who doesn't know english very well.
- 538
- 26
As kids these days say: "welp".
Guess i'll help around on the discord then.
Thanks for the consideration, though.
Guess i'll help around on the discord then.
Thanks for the consideration, though.
- 167,681
- 76,260
- Thread starter
- #4,532
- 167,681
- 76,260
- Thread starter
- #4,533
Goodbye then.
- 42,613
- 36,890
I am literally watching the thread and got no notification. Da fug.
- 9,349
- 8,144
Apologies, I don't even remember why I did it, as apparently no one asked me to do it. I think it may have been a mistake as on mobile the tiering system page is the one linked on the home of my phone, and I may have done something wrong.
I'll pay more attention in the future and later I'm going to check if something I opened after a request is still unlocked.
- 21,468
- 30,790
- 9,261
- 3,388
oof
- 42,613
- 36,890
...
- 15,436
- 7,857
The OP on the thread itself doesn't even deny it. Permaban.
- 42,613
- 36,890
Agreed with The_Phoenix_Wright_Way
- 16,959
- 4,855
Big oof
- 167,681
- 76,260
- Thread starter
- #4,543
Who should we ban, and why? We only tend to do things of that nature to people who create several accounts to evade bans and the like.
It happens sometimes that people switch to another account in this forum, we are automatically informed about it, and privately tell them to pick one account and stick with it. We cannot be too draconian in this respect, or we would lose lots of valuable members.
It happens sometimes that people switch to another account in this forum, we are automatically informed about it, and privately tell them to pick one account and stick with it. We cannot be too draconian in this respect, or we would lose lots of valuable members.
- 3,120
- 1,693
Some context on that screencap would be nice. I saw what was said in the thread but that really isn't too much to go off of.
- 31,372
- 34,119
Seems the OP, and I think they were suggesting he came here just to be a Yesman for a permanently banned user. But I agree that nothing he said directly on site appeared to be that bad. I'm not sure if he really said anything ban worthy.
- 1,342
- 671
Getting help for an argument from someone who is against this wiki doesn't feel like throw a ban to me.
- 15,436
- 7,857
The guy that the OP of the linked thread contacted was a banned member that OP was trying to use to farm agreement votes from. Omega's reaction to being called out on these facts was just "yeah lol hope they don't ban me".
- 15,436
- 7,857
He's not "getting help". He literally said "say yes on this thread". That's ban worthy.
- 15,436
- 7,857
Literally the whole reason we ban socks is to prevent this kind of thing, guys. There's no point in voting if I can just grab my friends and say "hey, make an account and say yes to this for me".
- 167,681
- 76,260
- Thread starter
- #4,550
Can somebody please explain the full context regarding what happened here to me?
Did some member just ask some other current member to help out in a thread, or did something more extreme take place?
Did some member just ask some other current member to help out in a thread, or did something more extreme take place?
- 1,342
- 671
But it's very strict, basically he said he doesn't need much (Hehe welp not like I need it), all I see in this scenario is that this person is innocent. (if you think about it as a fake account or something, so yes but if it's not, it doesn't make sense to me.)
- 15,436
- 7,857
The OP of a content revision thread contacted someone who got banned from this site, asking him to make an account and say yes to his content revision.
When called out on this with a screenshot, he didn't deny it (which he admittedly could have, as fake comments like that aren't hard to make) and instead said "yeah lol hope I don't get banned".
When called out on this with a screenshot, he didn't deny it (which he admittedly could have, as fake comments like that aren't hard to make) and instead said "yeah lol hope I don't get banned".
- 15,436
- 7,857
...And? He still tried to rig the votes in his favor. That's ban worthy.
- 845
- 246
Why does he go through all that trouble for one vote for a CRT that likely wouldn’t be accepted anyways?
Sad!
Sad!
- 21,468
- 30,790
The_Wright_Way holds the same views on the topic as I do.
He flat out noted that it was ban worthy, didn't even deny it, and he basically told a banned member to make a sock account just for a "FRA".
He flat out noted that it was ban worthy, didn't even deny it, and he basically told a banned member to make a sock account just for a "FRA".
- 1,342
- 671
Okay, he may have opened an account at their request, but he request for it himself too, and if this guy's going to get ban, I'd like to ask to you this;
If the information he says turns out to be true, are you going to throw the truth away just because one person has made vaguely-obscure mistakes?
- 15,436
- 7,857
...What the hell are you even talking about? He literally just asked his friends to say yes to a CRT he was making in order to push it through regardless of the site's views on the matter. That's not a "vaguely-obscure" mistake.
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,146
- 14,406
I don't think it is ban worthy, the guy is just look like innocent and gullible
Also, there is still crt going on, unless something too extreme which is no the case here until now, i don't think he need to be ban, even if there is another agree FRA comment, it is not effect the crt result that big, still need evaluate to be pass
Also, there is still crt going on, unless something too extreme which is no the case here until now, i don't think he need to be ban, even if there is another agree FRA comment, it is not effect the crt result that big, still need evaluate to be pass
- 13,816
- 3,795
Yup, that settles it then. Ban.
Similar threads
