• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

That is a good point.

So would 2 weeks of ban for Garchomp and 4 weeks for Godzilla be appropriate? And if so, what should the motivations be?
To Garchomp it should be "(Kept derailing in threads despite the previous warnings)"

Tho I'd personally make at least a month for him since that happened too much times
 
Final warning for Garchomp, month ban for Godzilla.

Motivation should be: "Has been rather hostile for many months now, and it is best that a short break is in order"
Okay. I would appreciate if some other administrator or bureaucrat is willing to handle this.
 
So what should we do about Garchomp and Godzilla?
 
Well, the problem is that we need some personal staff experience regarding Godzilla before we can issue such a long ban.
 
Well, the problem is that we need some personal staff experience regarding Godzilla before we can issue such a long ban.
I've seen Godzilla consistently be a hassle in MonsterVerse threads personally, and as has been brought up he seems to be this way in other threads too, I think I ban is in order if he's been like this for 2 years, but I'm not sure how long should be issued.
 
That's not an attack, that's calling you out on being condescending. Not a single genuine insult was even thrown there.
Is being presumptuous a compliment? This guy wasn't even in the discussion, but he just came in to offend me, after seeing that I refuted another friend of his who has the same behavior of getting into discussions without understanding the context.
 
Much like an animal who's back is against the wall, of course he's going to go for "He came into the thread to attack me."


First of all, get over yourself i have no reason to follow a thread solely because of you. I've had no previous interaction with you, so quite frankly I could care less about you.



Secondly, stop spewing asinine nonsense. I came into the thread to give my opinion, any user is allowed to comment on any thread they wish. Stop playing the boy who cried wolf, it's pathetic.
 
Is being presumptuous a compliment? This guy wasn't even in the discussion, but he just came in to offend me, after seeing that I refuted another friend of his who has the same behavior of getting into discussions without understanding the context.
Nothing he said was offensive or against our rules. Unlike what you said.
 
Yes, that's what I meant by our rules.

Anyway, lets just see what staff have to say.
 
Are you going to ignore your own "**********" comment? Which was completely uncalled for? That alone would be a warning if not a bannable offense.
 
Back
Top