- 1,626
- 146
This is the guy who did it. He changed Hagoromo to boundless via having subjective reality, check the history.
Changed deku to 1-A but High Outerversal too
Changed deku to 1-A but High Outerversal too
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 5,106
- 2,543
He said he ain't serious in his message wall, so yeah, pretty clear vandal
- 165,117
- 72,041
- Thread starter
- #3,204
Just a note that I would appreciate if the people who help out in this thread always properly undo the vandal edits so the pages that the vandals distorted are brought back to the exact states that they were in before, as I had to handle it in several cases this time.
Except for that, thank you all for helping out.
Except for that, thank you all for helping out.
- 1,808
- 2,809
User Niceguyarecucs
Vandalized Shanks' profile last time.
Now, he did it to Izuku Midoriya's profile.
EDIT: Thanks a lot.
Vandalized Shanks' profile last time.
Now, he did it to Izuku Midoriya's profile.
EDIT: Thanks a lot.
- 29,762
- 24,784
I've taken care of him.
- 1,342
- 675
Did Matthew get blocked from the site? Why?
- 4,942
- 1,316
It says HR decisions
- 1,342
- 675
okay, but why?
- 1,808
- 2,809
He got reported in RVR his behavior, but since reporting staff in RVR isn't enough, Human Resources got involved. No, rather, Human Resources had to be involved in it.
- 29,762
- 24,784
Since it has been take care of by HR (and the question up above has been answered now), let's not discuss it anymore in this thread.
- 1,342
- 675
Okay, I read it (I honestly think Matt's right) but I'm not going to argue, hopefully he comes back as soon as possible
- 6,971
- 4,225
- 4,942
- 1,316
Wasn't Cosmicdragon1001 a sock puppet of Pan? If he is, he shouldn't be let backAnyway, a banned member made an appeal to be allowed to come back to this forum:
Antvasima
community.fandom.com
- 12,440
- 4,573
- 16,927
- 4,844
Yeah no offense to Garchomp, but I have to back up Strym on this one too. He continuously makes inflated, wanked, and/or trolling remarks in threads (mostly Pokemon related) despite being repeatedly called out on doing that and asked to stop.
- 12,440
- 4,573
He was even warned (and even banned) before more times, an Infinite ban at this point is necessary
- 4,942
- 1,316
I swear that every time I see him, he does something like that. He's just annoying as hell
- 12,440
- 4,573
He was already banned for three months before if you wonder
- 1,626
- 146
Why do you think im "wanking" just for having different opinions? So many people here wank and downplay many verses as well. And how is making a joke harmful, my "wank" isn't even trolling just because you disagree with it
- 12,440
- 4,573
You constantly suggest them without doing a CRT, plus all your ratings are absurdly high, plus you even revive old threads with troll answers.
You didn't get any better from your 3-months ban
You didn't get any better from your 3-months ban
- 1,626
- 146
Having higher ratings then what they are on the site isn't even trolling at all, why do you think its trolling because my opinion is different?
- 12,440
- 4,573
Yes, you always put such ridiculously high ratings without even scans backing them
- 16,927
- 4,844
Having a different opinion is fine, but it becomes disruptive when you continuously express it in threads here on site without making a CRT.
You can personally perceive ratings in any way you want, but on this site, we go with what's accepted on the pages above all else, and you need to abide by that.
You can personally perceive ratings in any way you want, but on this site, we go with what's accepted on the pages above all else, and you need to abide by that.
- 4,942
- 1,316
Pretty sure he claimed 6D mewtwo and derailed the 2-A pokemon thread, and almost every thread he's on
- 4,942
- 1,316
And one last thing to add, he used game mechanics as his arguments on the top 5 strongest 5-B thread
- 1,626
- 146
I even said those stuff weren't on his profile and then gave an answer for profile only matches, like most other threads i comment on
I do believe in 6D mewtwo but i obviously didn't spend time talking about the explanation and show me where i derailed
- 1,626
- 146
I don't see why that's not harmless, and I was talking about how sp def is canonically non physical defense against psychic attacks
- 12,440
- 4,573
Like, you started sprouting your ususal non-sense to why PMD charas should be 2-A
- 1,626
- 146
Thats not derailing we were talking about PMD at the time
Thats something really small its just high 5-A magikarp, its just 1 sentence
- 4,942
- 1,316
Yes, and 6D Mewtwo, and some other things
- 1,626
- 146
The 6d mewtwo statement was also harmless and whenever i talk about non listed hax i also give answers for profile only stuff
- 12,440
- 4,573
Again: This stuff is for CRTs, not unrelated threads lmfao. But these ratings of yours are either based on extraggerated intrerpretations or game mechanics
- 4,942
- 1,316
Derailing is derailing
- 1,808
- 2,809
I think the optimal solution for now is to put all the evidences against Garchomp in this thread, and stop arguing whether which evidences are valid/applicable and which aren't. Because we're probably not gonna get anywhere if this continues, not until staff comes, no? A compilation of all report-worthy behavior should be added in one go, not stacking them up one by one while questioning their validity at the same time, because it feels chaotic, that's what I think, at least.
Preferably, we'd have to wait for others to make a decision on this as well.
Preferably, we'd have to wait for others to make a decision on this as well.
Last edited:
- 1,626
- 146
Ok show me where i derailed on CRT. Again, why are exaggerated interpretations that you disagree with not harmless?
It still isn't anything though.
Similar threads
