• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Mr. Bambu said:
You aren't being banned. You're being warned to knock it off.

My message has a link to your now-deleted comment. Staff members can still see deleted messages and can confirm it. You've been warned for similar behavior before, so stop it. It really is that simple.

Moving on.
Click to expand...
okay then. One last question, where (and to whom) can i report a staff member?
 
I think It’s a translation error. The user is trying to say that someone used his calc in a thread w/o his permission — as far as I am aware, we don’t have any standards regarding this, but I think it should be common courtesy to ask someone’s permission before using their calc.
 
Catzlaflame said:
I think It’s a translation error. The user is trying to say that someone used his calc in a thread w/o his permission — as far as I am aware, we don’t have any standards regarding this, but I think it should be common courtesy to ask someone’s permission before using their calc.
Click to expand...
This topic has been brought up before. While kinda rude, it's not a rule violation to use another's findings for your own CRT iirc.
 
Normally, I do not report people, and I don't want to report someone who is currently banned, but this is repeat behavior and has gotten on my nerves.

WeeklyBattles used blatant misinformation in this RWBY calc, and presented evidence in such a way that lead to a major upgrade in statistics, despite the fact that in-game knowledge and simply reading a couple seconds back shows that it was not valid.

This is the calc in question, and while I'd normally say "maybe he just slipped up" given Weekly's past behavior, I cannot in good faith say this.

You can see the full explanation on why this calc is misleading in this CRT, but the cliff notes version is that in RWBY: Arrowfell, Yang gets an upgrade to an ability which the game states can "melt iron blocks" but the previous conversation clearly lays out what the ability is not this at all, and Weekly very much neglected to not include this important piece of information.

I'll leave this to the admins.
 
CurrySenpai said:
Normally, I do not report people, and I don't want to report someone who is currently banned, but this is repeat behavior and has gotten on my nerves.

WeeklyBattles used blatant misinformation in this RWBY calc, and presented evidence in such a way that lead to a major upgrade in statistics, despite the fact that in-game knowledge and simply reading a couple seconds back shows that it was not valid.

This is the calc in question, and while I'd normally say "maybe he just slipped up" given Weekly's past behavior, I cannot in good faith say this.

You can see the full explanation on why this calc is misleading in this CRT, but the cliff notes version is that in RWBY: Arrowfell, Yang gets an upgrade to an ability which the game states can "melt iron blocks" but the previous conversation clearly lays out what the ability is not this at all, and Weekly very much neglected to not include this important piece of information.

I'll leave this to the admins.
Click to expand...
I talked to Weekly off-site and asked if he has anything to say in his defence. I suggest waiting for a response from him before giving any concluding evaluations.
 
CurrySenpai said:
Imma be real I just assumed they were taking about privately but if not that’s nice to know
Click to expand...
Since this is a public RVRT report then I think discussions should be held here. Unless you submitted another off-site or private report against him.
 
CurrySenpai said:
Original Report
Click to expand...
As an addendum to my Weekly report I am adding this account from RustyOne, which shows that Weekly got the calc approved the original way as melting (what the text implies at least), but then proceeded to stealth edit it after Rusty's analysis and change it to vaporization, which shoots the calcs value much higher than what it should be.

Rusty did not participate in the following CRT and Weekly just passed it as if nothing had happened or without informing anyone.
 
As I said I’ll do this shit before, here’s what Weekly says:
CurrySenpai said:
WeeklyBattles used blatant misinformation in this RWBY calc, and presented evidence in such a way that lead to a major upgrade in statistics, despite the fact that in-game knowledge and simply reading a couple seconds back shows that it was not valid.
Click to expand...
okay for starters no, I did not make this calc with any intention of it being used as an upgrade. I even specifically wrote at the bottom of the blog that it is a bit feat that doesnt affect any scaling
image.png

this calc was made when RWBY was still City level, it didnt affect any of the scaling at the time

youre really going to accuse me of falsifying a calc to be used in a downgrade that happened over a year after the calc was made, and that happened a year after I was banned? seriously?
CurrySenpai said:
You can see the full explanation on why this calc is misleading in this CRT, but the cliff notes version is that in RWBY: Arrowfell, Yang gets an upgrade to an ability which the game states can "melt iron blocks" but the previous conversation clearly lays out what the ability is not this at all, and Weekly very much neglected to not include this important piece of information.
Click to expand...
Yangmelt1.webp

The game says she melts them so that is what I calced.

I even posted a clip of the gameplay at the beginning of the calc to show the feat happening and Rusty backed me up on it after watching the clip commenting the same point of view that I had, that the depiction of the blocks shattering is a gameplay limitation.
CurrySenpai said:
As an addendum to my Weekly report I am adding this account from RustyOne, which shows that Weekly got the calc approved the original way as melting (what the text implies at least), but then proceeded to stealth edit it after Rusty's analysis and change it to vaporization, which shoots the calcs value much higher than what it should be.

Rusty did not participate in the following CRT and Weekly just passed it as if nothing had happened or without informing anyone.
Click to expand...
Im gonna be 100% real with this, I dont know why I changed it nor do i even recall changing it. I agree it should be changed back to 8-B, the current version is inaccurate. Thats my bad, i apologize.
 
A reminder for non staff users to not comment unless they have something useful pertaining to the case.

With Weekly's response, I honestly find it lacking. He doesn't remember changing it? Bit convenient given the severity of the actions. The initial report is lacking, as quite honestly one can reasonably explain what happened without necessarily assuming malice (I live by the saying to never attribute malice to what can be attributed to incompetence). However, the editing part to inflate the value? Pretty damning.
 
Non-staff not contributing to the report, please don't chime in. Curry may speak because she's the one giving the report, although I ask that she keeps pointless chatter to a minimum, obviously.

Weekly seems to deny the motive for falsifying the calc, but he offers no explanation as to why he did do it and admits that he did change it to vaporization without approval and presented it as legitimate. I'm waiting to hear from other staff before crying havoc.
 
GarrixianXD said:
As I said I’ll do this shit before, here’s what Weekly says:

okay for starters no, I did not make this calc with any intention of it being used as an upgrade. I even specifically wrote at the bottom of the blog that it is a bit feat that doesnt affect any scaling
image.png

this calc was made when RWBY was still City level, it didnt affect any of the scaling at the time

youre really going to accuse me of falsifying a calc to be used in a downgrade that happened over a year after the calc was made, and that happened a year after I was banned? seriously?

Yangmelt1.webp

The game says she melts them so that is what I calced.

I even posted a clip of the gameplay at the beginning of the calc to show the feat happening and Rusty backed me up on it after watching the clip commenting the same point of view that I had, that the depiction of the blocks shattering is a gameplay limitation.

Im gonna be 100% real with this, I dont know why I changed it nor do i even recall changing it. I agree it should be changed back to 8-B, the current version is inaccurate. Thats my bad, i apologize.
Click to expand...
Could I see the actual screenshot of this?
 
The calc changing is a false alarm:

2023/3/20 16:57 - TheRustyOne :
This seems fine to me.
Click to expand...
While gameplay shows it shattering, the ability in universe is stated to melt the blocks. Which means the gameplay is a design choice, either via limitations or some other reason.
Click to expand...

Weekly performed this edit on 2023/3/19 22:56, which means he edited his calculation before it was accepted.

Not sure why he admitted that he done that, but it seems like he did not.
 
CurrySenpai said:
As an addendum to my Weekly report I am adding this account from RustyOne, which shows that Weekly got the calc approved the original way as melting (what the text implies at least), but then proceeded to stealth edit it after Rusty's analysis and change it to vaporization, which shoots the calcs value much higher than what it should be.

Rusty did not participate in the following CRT and Weekly just passed it as if nothing had happened or without informing anyone.
Click to expand...
I decided to check the timeframe for this on Weekly's contributions. The stealth edit did in fact took place the same day as Rusty accepted it. However, seems Weekly's recollection of the feat used for support checks out, as the thread to downgrade the ratings (and subsequent one to add the calc on profile) took place well after the fact.

This imo lowers the severity of the infraction, but without an adequate explanation of why the edit took place at all, still is damning.
 
GarrixianXD said:
The calc changing is a false alarm:

2023/3/20 16:57 - TheRustyOne :



Weekly performed this edit on 2023/3/19 22:56, which means he edited his calculation before it was accepted.

Not sure why he admitted that he done that, but it seems like he did not.
Click to expand...
Ah, ninja'd, seems I also was mistaken.

Edit: I, in fact, was not mistaken.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...WBY:_Yang_Melts_Cubes?diff=prev&oldid=7923410

The timeframe is several minutes after Rusty's comment
 
Strange, this is what it displayed for me:



Fandom being fandom I see 💀
 
GarrixianXD said:
Oh yeah, forgot to mention the time I listed should be PST. If it says 20th for you then it should say 21st for Rusty’s comment.
Click to expand...
I'm seeing March 20 for both of them as well.

3/20/2023, 4:57:07 AM

05:56, 20 March 2023

We should confirm what is the real time first, since it'd be my fault for not noticing the change if it was before my evaluation.
 
I think I know what's going on. The date of the edit displays in accordance with your timezone, while comment history does not. To be more specific, I changed the timezone on my fandom account to GMT+8 and the time of Weekly's edit changed to 13:56, 20 March 2023, but Rusty's comment is still at 2023/3/20 16:57. This is a bug by fandom; I'm unsure what timezone the comment history system is set on. I think it'll be good to ask about this on Zendesk.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
30 31 32
Replies
1K
Views
94K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
5K
Agnaa
Agnaa
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
19
Views
2K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
423
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top