- 8,462
- 1,468
I was also there in the beginning of the thread and yes I went to go back to add what I've said cause he was taunted a few times but lets not ignore the fact he did started it and you were being a bit rude to a staff yourself
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 5,156
- 4,251
Also why is Planck a "none staff" on the voting list? @MasqueTLDF It count as "vote manipulation" while I am willing to give the benefits of the doughts and say you didn't know he was a admin
Deleted member 15008
Guest
Planck commented on the thread? I dind't even see that lol
- 1,896
- 851
Not a VSBW staff, and they stated I was wrong without providing evidence (Please don't be disingenuous)
How is what I said rude?
Since when was unnecessary rude? It was literally a compliment.
That person admitted to dropping the series and kept derailing the thread.
I said that because it wasn't a complicated matter and you couldn't understand that you were derailing the thread throughout.
And i find it very odd that you wait until after I said I'd report you to report me. I strongly urge staff to check the whole thread. I am confident that I've done nothing wrong.
- 8,462
- 1,468
That literally means you purposely glossed over the mean comment in favor of supporting him just cause you both agree on the thread. You have also been a bit rude as well from what I've seen
- 1,896
- 851
- 8,462
- 1,468
I was planning on doing it after seeing most of your comments cause again your words were quite rude and your accusations were equally of the sort with lying about it. I already made edits in case you didn't see saying how you was taunted a bit and you reacted accordingly respectful way but to the others that were actually give you a fair debate is a different story
- 1,896
- 851
I wasn't rude in the slightest, I've been being as nice as possible despite being ridiculed, false reported, and insulted. Even now I'm trying to be as respectful as possible. Again, every instance is taken out of context and I STRONGLY urge staff to give this a detailed look.
- 8,462
- 1,468
You just said it, "I was being as nice as possible" is still the same as what I've said beforehand, being rude while covering it with politeness and no only like 1 person was being rude first to you (derailing and mocking you for no reason). This is why I said you started it all first and yes I implore for staff to look at each comment from everyone in that thread. Im not asking for anything ban worthy, but a warning
- 5,156
- 4,251
I am blind.... I apologise @MasqueTLDF I mistook Phoenks and planck, due to the Similarity of there name and nameplate colour... Unsure if I should delete it or not since I have people replied to it already, So feel free to do that.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,086
- 29,910
I don't think he should take the conversation down that path of dialogue, but it isn't obscene or even worthy of much note. Don't fling around accusations like that unprompted, though. Certainly can't help the discussion.
This is such an ingrained part of the lingo that it most certainly doesn't warrant a rule violation. Claiming something is debunked is for the other side to disprove (or dismiss, if the claim is just blatantly wrong). You don't report them for the claim.
I mean. It isn't nice, in tone, but unworthy of even a slap on the wrist. It's the barest of offenses. Nobody is a saint, the debate is sure to wear thin on people's patience at times. Forgive the petty slights like this, because we certainly won't be taking action against someone for saying "nice try though lol".
If they were, this should be said.
See point three. It could be phrased peacefully, but it's such an insanely minor implication that it isn't worthy of even a warning. Most of the report is a collection of minor (very minor) offenses, or straight up non-offenses.
I don't know which way I'd vote on the CRT, but insofar as I can tell, nothing worthy of a warning occurred (yet).
- 1,896
- 851
I don't mean to bother you or be a burden but is there anyway that I'd be able to limit interactions with those two users, I just don't want to keep dealing with this every other day. It's pretty stressful feeling like you're in trouble all the time... And if you could close the thread, I'd very much appreciate that as well, thank you for your time.
- 8,462
- 1,468
Ok thats fair
I added this because of how he was responding to people and this was also how it was as well considering he replied to the person who was even being mean to begin with, then u respond what that? come on now, most people wouldn't even put that there to begin with hence why it was just unnecessary
This was to mock of what he replied to me, again, his response to others was obvious especially adding that which again was a testament to his rudeness
Still didn't need to be said like at all. Its obvious of what the intentions were especially when the member wasn't again being mean first (if he was then that makes sense but from what I've seen the guy was debating in a fair way)
We are grown adults in 2024, if someone told me to use "common sense" then its an attack on my intellect. This wasn't even needed to say to begin with so yes the intention was obvious
- 8,462
- 1,468
I just want to say I don't hate or dislike you. I think u are a pretty good guy and wouldn't like to lose interaction with u (feel like we have a good chemistry and its thanks to you that DxD is getting revived). I do think however that the things ya said were mean and shouldn't have been said and I expect the same for you and anyone else to do the same for me if I'm acting this way. We may have different opinion but that doesn't mean imma get upset (I liked your comment when you politely told that member that was mocking you in a responding way). Its hard for me to see that you wasn't tryna be rude but if you are hell bent on thinking u didn't mean it like that then fine
- 1,896
- 851
That's fine.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,588
Someone should maybe tell this guy to chill out.
vsbattles.com
EDIT: Handled by Duedate.
my little pony cosmology possible upgrade
So, in my little pony, it was shown that the infinite hallway is just a metaphor for choice, each door in it represents another choice you might make and another future it would create. that would mean, every logical possibility would exist why? you would ask, why wouldn't it be many worlds...
Last edited:
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,588
Has the ban been undone yet?
- 15,331
- 22,665
I know this case is closed (or not??), but since i was patially mentioned in, somewhat, i just want to explain on my side that, no, i not trying to argue in bad faith, that what i genuinely believe based on how the verse informations give me, but if it appear that i was arguing in bad faith, then i'm terribly sorry for that
It is fine, @MasqueTLDF is new to the site, he couldn't know what kind of person i'm as this is the first interaction with me on site, it is normal course of feeling that he felt that i was arguing in bad faith as i against his opinion, and i hold no hard feeling toward him either, so this is fine, sometime people's emotion went up and slip some harsh words out, it is fine, me too sometime. Still appreciate that you defend, me, thank.
Anyway i hope this case is closed, thank everyone
- 177,784
- 90,838
- Thread starter
- #27,339
The following member wishes to appeal their ban:
community.fandom.com
vsbattles.fandom.com
What do other staff members here think?
Antvasima
community.fandom.com
User contributions for Urshani2 | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
What do other staff members here think?
- 8,826
- 9,414
Let them stay banned
- 34,727
- 42,158
I'd prefer to hear more elaborate details, but I don't normally buy appeals if they give simplicated reasons. But at the same time, I'd prefer to know the severity of the offsite link.
- 10,995
- 16,265
IIRC this was Mr. Bambu's detailed report on that subject: https://vsbattles.com/threads/rule-violation-reports-new-forum.107529/post-6426549
- 34,727
- 42,158
Oh yeah, I remember now. And yeah, I'd say keep them banned. They already caused too much trouble as it is.
- 16,083
- 6,125
Urshani is especially weird.
He and I used to talk, but I found his line of questioning pretty annoying in relation to Megami Tensei (which it was usually questions about why characters from one narrative wouldn’t show up in other games), but in hindsight I was likely too quick to aggression, a problem I still struggle with. It’s only after we outright stopped talking he sorta descended on this Anti-MegaTen into just a complete rejection of powerscaling outright. You can even see in his prior posts he legit was elated at the idea of High 1-A MegaTen, and even before that when it first hit 1-A.
Not to toot my own horn in any way, but the guy sorta pulled a Syndrome, and I guess ripped the poster of me off his wall and decided MegaTen and scaling overall is stupid, but he somehow still manages to want my attention in some form, considering he, funnily enough, linked his massive MegaTen downgrade document to me that I legitimately did not know it existed till he got banned. I really don’t know what made him turn up this way, though I do distinctly remember Agnaa and Bambu having entirely opposing views on the subject; the former believing his questioning on the tiering system should merely be clarified, meanwhile the latter believing it was a systematic attempt at dismantling the tiering system for… funsies, I suppose.
Know I’m not a mod, but me and him have some sorta history, so I wanted to throw my two cents. I don’t think he’s a bad guy, certainly not compared to prior people that’ve been banned, but I think at most you could just watch over him. Though considering the tiering system just got revised, may be the same ol mistakes.
He and I used to talk, but I found his line of questioning pretty annoying in relation to Megami Tensei (which it was usually questions about why characters from one narrative wouldn’t show up in other games), but in hindsight I was likely too quick to aggression, a problem I still struggle with. It’s only after we outright stopped talking he sorta descended on this Anti-MegaTen into just a complete rejection of powerscaling outright. You can even see in his prior posts he legit was elated at the idea of High 1-A MegaTen, and even before that when it first hit 1-A.
Not to toot my own horn in any way, but the guy sorta pulled a Syndrome, and I guess ripped the poster of me off his wall and decided MegaTen and scaling overall is stupid, but he somehow still manages to want my attention in some form, considering he, funnily enough, linked his massive MegaTen downgrade document to me that I legitimately did not know it existed till he got banned. I really don’t know what made him turn up this way, though I do distinctly remember Agnaa and Bambu having entirely opposing views on the subject; the former believing his questioning on the tiering system should merely be clarified, meanwhile the latter believing it was a systematic attempt at dismantling the tiering system for… funsies, I suppose.
Know I’m not a mod, but me and him have some sorta history, so I wanted to throw my two cents. I don’t think he’s a bad guy, certainly not compared to prior people that’ve been banned, but I think at most you could just watch over him. Though considering the tiering system just got revised, may be the same ol mistakes.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,086
- 29,910
I think he willfully engages in slander of the site because he disagrees, and he goes to lengths to spread that slander beyond just saying it. I think he has sought out this other blog of disillusioned people taking random (and ultimately, as previously mentioned, incorrect) potshots at the site to justify themselves, somehow. So it is my opinion that by championing that and pushing it about paints him as someone who shouldn't be on this site.
However. Milly was, I believe, the first user he took to slandering, and it was with significant force. To an extent, I think the opinion of the wronged should be considered, and in this instance, I may be willing to be lenient given that it seems to be (clarification wanted) Milly's opinion that he should be unbanned. Specifically, he was banned in May: I think he should remain banned for some duration of time still, rather than being fully unbanned, but it may be a short timeframe. Personally, I land upon a three month timeframe from his original ban- this would mean he gets unbanned next month.
I do not know if this is a user who will stay consistent to his claim that he won't cause trouble anymore, hard to say given the apparent switching-of-'sides' he's already done. But I'm willing to at least see if he can.
However. Milly was, I believe, the first user he took to slandering, and it was with significant force. To an extent, I think the opinion of the wronged should be considered, and in this instance, I may be willing to be lenient given that it seems to be (clarification wanted) Milly's opinion that he should be unbanned. Specifically, he was banned in May: I think he should remain banned for some duration of time still, rather than being fully unbanned, but it may be a short timeframe. Personally, I land upon a three month timeframe from his original ban- this would mean he gets unbanned next month.
I do not know if this is a user who will stay consistent to his claim that he won't cause trouble anymore, hard to say given the apparent switching-of-'sides' he's already done. But I'm willing to at least see if he can.
- 5,163
- 11,793
Bumping this case. I think this is very urgent and important for the wiki, therefore more staff members' attention is appreciated.Sorry for the interruption, but considering the mass difference in activity here compared to the vandalism reports thread, I like the staff team's attention to this post of mines.
- 16,083
- 6,125
Yeah, at best he’s just annoying. Besides, I’ve been called worse by smarter people off-site anyways, “idiot” won’t make me spiral. But the part about him dismantling the tiering system and such is outta my control, so that’s your call.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,086
- 29,910
It's less about 'dismantling the system' (he couldn't do that if he wanted to, really) and more about the drama drummed up in his activities. Still. I hereby sign off on a reduction of his ban to three months (meaning his ban would be completed next month).
- 16,083
- 6,125
Aye, I agree with that.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,086
- 29,910
I'd read it, yeah. His statement about being an "anti-powerscaler" was there when I did.
If that's all acceptable for everyone else, we can move on, I think.
- 8,826
- 9,414
His claims about being an "anti-powerscaling" seems quite fishy and doesn't seem to sit well with me at all. And prior to the last reports, he's already caused enough trouble as it is, his appeal doesn't even seem to have that much detailed context behind it. I'm still standing by keeping him banned
- 1,967
- 1,685
Um I dont know where to ask this but former user MeiouHades asked me to post this during a private Discord conversation. He wishes to ask if its possible to appeal his ban or if it is permanent
- 7,915
- 15,096
It's not either/or. It was permanent, but all bans can be appealed technically speaking.
- 34,727
- 42,158
I agree, we have had far too many people who claimed that only to turn out to be dishonest and end up U-turning back to square one. It's not the first time he caused a lot of trouble only to request being banned, then after requesting a ban lift has went back to square one and behaved arguably worse than they did before the first time. It is still problematic to be posting threads made with 0 context other than responses prone to great controversy. He's also spammy with the report queue; such as the times he report bombed Damage (I think) and said "This guy is a pedophile" while showing 0 evidence.
He just seems like someone we'd rather not have sticking around.
- 177,784
- 90,838
- Thread starter
- #27,356
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,588
Sorry to keep posting about this but since Bambu and Ant have both agreed with removing the threadban, can that be applied yet
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Bureaucrat
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 25,086
- 29,910
It's been revoked.
- 5,163
- 11,793
Bumping this again.Sorry for the interruption, but considering the mass difference in activity here compared to the vandalism reports thread, I like the staff team's attention to this post of mines.
- 1,967
- 1,685
Oh alright but how does one do that though if they're banned?
