-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 3,191
- 3,444
New account with two histories of simple vandalism.
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #23,127
Hello.
This is a community notice that yesterday our forum system manager had to rebuild the code of our notification bell plugin to fix a problem with a recent update to it, which caused the notification alerts for our members to be automatically marked as read.
Please use the following page to keep track of unread messages in the meantime:
The discussion titles in bold text contain unread messages.
I greatly apologise for the inconvenience.
This is a community notice that yesterday our forum system manager had to rebuild the code of our notification bell plugin to fix a problem with a recent update to it, which caused the notification alerts for our members to be automatically marked as read.
Please use the following page to keep track of unread messages in the meantime:
The discussion titles in bold text contain unread messages.
I greatly apologise for the inconvenience.
Last edited:
Kirinator07
He/Him- 2,193
- 446
Thanks for the explanation on the bold titled threads
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #23,130
Should I create a separate news and announcements thread with a connected pop-up notification message regarding this issue, so most of our members notice it?Hello.
This is just a community notice that our forum system manager seems to have accidentally marked all of our notification bell alerts as read when he tried to make it work properly after our recent update to the add-on.
Please use the following page to keep track of unread messages in the meantime:
The discussion titles in bold text contain unread messages.
I greatly apologise for the inconvenience.
- 11,250
- 19,726
One question, wouldn't it be more effective when reporting a message using the report button to directly mention/quote the reported message? or it also redirects you directly to the last posted message, because it sends you to the first message on the first page.Also, our forum system manager has fixed the "Report" links in all of our discussion thread posts so they lead to this thread again.
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #23,133
Good point. Thank you for bringing it up.
I think that this would be the correct link structure to use for that:
https://vsbattles.com/threads/rule-violation-reports-new-forum.107529/unread
I think that this would be the correct link structure to use for that:
https://vsbattles.com/threads/rule-violation-reports-new-forum.107529/unread
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #23,134
It has been handled now.Good point. Thank you for bringing it up.
I think that this would be the correct link structure to use for that:
https://vsbattles.com/threads/rule-violation-reports-new-forum.107529/unread
- 8,997
- 9,718
I reverted the edits
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 22,756
- 22,267
Don't feel too optimistic but I dropped him a message.
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #23,138
I permanently blocked them. It was a blatant deliberate serial-vandal.
- 8,997
- 9,718
- 17,216
- 12,655
Raiden got vandalized by this guy who wrote that "Raiden's stat change made by a professional researcher and a moderator sent by the Metal Gear Solid Fandom"
LMAO
LMAO
- 10,738
- 16,000
Is it possible it's the same person that Ant just blocked? Their M.O.'s seem similar
- 31,372
- 34,118
Blocked
This guy was already warned by Antvasima for doing the same thing, so a block sounds in order.
- 167,679
- 76,256
- Thread starter
- #23,143
Thank you for helping out.
Thank you for blocking them as well. 3 months seemed approprate, yes, as they did not seem to actually be malicious.
- 4,606
- 5,427
Reporting @Kirinator07 for upgrading Jack Gooday's range to Universal/Interdimensional using as a justification a CRT from years ago which was made for another character, who only has Planetary range btw, and in said thread any upgrade to Universal/Interdimensional range was mentioned or applied, this happened because of this vs thread
- 10,116
- 11,488
Isn't this like the billionth time he did this?
- 4,752
- 7,779
Bro's got 27 warnings and has been banned for doing this exact thing before
- 10,116
- 11,488
Yeah...
He also had this. I believe this warrants an outright ban now.
- 10,116
- 11,488
I don't about one year, a one month ban was applied the last time. Given @Agnaa and @Mr._Bambu were the ones that evaluated his case last time (with Agnaa applying the ban), I would like their evaluation here.
To me, at least 6 months ban would be appropriate.
noninho
He/Him- 3,460
- 1,118
Is it cool to say things like the last paragraph of this post?
If not, I'm reporting @Random-Helper323
If no-one else sees anything wrong, sorry for disturbing, but this isn't cool.
If not, I'm reporting @Random-Helper323
If no-one else sees anything wrong, sorry for disturbing, but this isn't cool.
- 11,555
- 10,672
Have no idea what the context is but the part of the comment you're upset about may actually be statistically correct (Figure 3). "Women are substantially more likely than men to identify as bisexual."
On top of that, I don't really think this is offensive or anything either way.
- 4,602
- 6,514
It's an odd comment. And as Phoenks notes, potentially factually incorrect. That being said, it doesn't look like they were trying to say anything distasteful - a claim about the proportion of people who are LGBT is not in itself a negative comment about LGBT people, if that's what the concern here is. I don't think any action is needed.
- 11,555
- 10,672
The comment would actually be potentially factually correct
(Just pointing this out - doesn't change anything)
noninho
He/Him- 3,460
- 1,118
Read again:
"In real life, most gay/bi men are gay, not bi. By contrast most gay/bi women are actually bi."
Is not how many people of x gender are bi
Is saying most bi men are actually gay and most "gay woman" are actually bi.
The text you provided doesn't add to that at all, the closest being:
"[...]
- Among adults who identify as LGB, bisexuals comprise a slight majority (1.8% compared to 1.7% who identify as lesbian or gay).
- Women are substantially more likely than men to identify as bisexual. Bisexuals comprise more than half of the lesbian and bisexual population among women in eight of the nine surveys considered in the brief. Conversely, gay men comprise substantially more than half of gay and bisexual men in seven of the nine surveys.
Which is clearly unrelated to the topic.
So it's incorrect. If no-one sees any need of action, then sorry for disturbing.
- 11,555
- 10,672
You missed Figure 3, which is the context of the quote I provided. I'll put it here for you.
This chart clearly shows that most bi/gay men are gay compared to it being more split with women. Which aligns with the comment that you're bringing up in this thread.
I'm not here to debate about statistics, but I would rather not be misrepresented.
- 4,602
- 6,514
Apologies - I misread your comment.
Similar threads
