Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know. That's the point, rudeness doesn't add anything to that. He did something way worse.Well the year was for using a racial slur.
I understand that you may have a different interpretation, but it's important to consider the context and impact of our words. The expression 'the word' is vulgar and sexually explicit in nature, and it can be seen as disrespectful and offensive by many people and specially by me.That's not sexual harassment. The expression doesn't mean anything inherently sexual (the fact this even needs explanation...)
Plus the general acting throughout the thread.Well the year was for using a racial slur.
The context is entirely non sexual.I understand that you may have a different interpretation, but it's important to consider the context and impact of our words. The expression 'the word' is vulgar and sexually explicit in nature, and it can be seen as disrespectful and offensive by many people and specially by me.
This type of comments or behavior can be considered disrespectful, offensive, and sexual harassing.
He's banned for a yearAny update on this report?
Alright. I guess I was a bit overreacted. I would say it does contain derogatory language and insults.The context is entirely non sexual.
It's about, essentially, "protecting you". Whether you want to ascribe something more there, that's on you personally, which I don't dispute.
Last thing I'll comment on the matter.
Calling people ignorant isn't report worthy brother...IDK what the hell to make of this. I only told him I won't change my opinion until his blog gets accepted by staff en masse, and he jumps to calling me ignorant.
I like not to dwell on such petty retorts so y'all can take it from here.
Oh... I see. My apologies.Calling people ignorant isn't report worthy brother...
Daily reminder that opinions from non staff are not appropriate to post in RVR.Calling people ignorant isn't report worthy brother...
Tbf Bambu is one of the most hypocritical, incompetent, biased, scummy staff members on here, bar Crab Damage and Deagon.
Please leave this to the staff if the report isn't directly related to you.He is thread-banned. Not sure if he can reply here. I guess temporary unmute works?
Simply unmute him or a short of time.
Yeah, I believe a year was agreed onYeah, saying the N word on site despite knowing full well that Fandom is very anti-slur. And while I do think their policies are a might more strict than necessary, rules are still rules and 6 months to a year is a reasonable punishment at least given Fandom TOS.
I've removed it.He is thread-banned. Not sure if he can reply here. I guess temporary unmute works?
Simply unmute him or a short of time.
A warning should work (unless there's a prior track record I'm unaware of).Reporting @TheMonkeMan for this comment and some others in the same thread.
I apologized to him about it in private, I was just incredibly pissed because my report on Dread was disregarded and I got thread banned for practically no good reason, so I started taking it out on others.Reporting @TheMonkeMan for this comment and some others in the same thread.
Apologies... he said that in the server where I am, and I felt mentioning it, so he can defend himself (since everyone has right for defending themselves)Please leave this to the staff if the report isn't directly related to you.
I'll take a warning, but will my report ever be taken into account?A warning should work (unless there's a prior track record I'm unaware of).
That matter got resolved already, my friend. The conclusion per Bambu's instructions was to take the report in consideration, but that no action needs to be taken at present:I'll take a warning, but will my report ever be taken into account?
I spent some time on gathering evidence for it. I feel that it should be properly evaluated.
Unless there's a valid reason for Dread being able to comment on staff threads so much without actually being staff her self, though I doubt there is.
This thread is not going to devolve into a six-hour whining rant about Dread speaking on staff threads. We will be keeping track of individuals who offer unwanted/inappropriate messages on staff-only threads in the future. As I said, we're moving on now.
I would extend it myself honestly considering the severity of the offense.And using the N word on site, in the RVR. Aighty. And I was trying to stay impartial.
I've taken the liberty of banning them for a year. My fellow staff can decide on whether that's too much.
In fairness though, by letting cases continue to go under the radar like this, it only becomes more of an issue. If other people are also doing this, crack down on that as well.We have a widespread issue with people commenting on staff threads without issue and no action being taken. We won't single out and make an example of Dread just because some people have a grudge against her.
If we decide to become systematically more strict about it, and it continues, then that's one thing. But she is far far from alone in doing so
Not the thread to ask this.I have a question. If a person is Russian by nationality, can he get banned on the forum and wiki?
I'll say this though, someone doing something that lots of others do doesn't make them any better.We have a widespread issue with people commenting on staff threads without issue and no action being taken. We won't single out and make an example of Dread just because some people have a grudge against her.
If we decide to become systematically more strict about it, and it continues, then that's one thing. But she is far far from alone in doing so
The question remains: Were you getting permission from staff to participate in these? Besides, of course, any staff threads you yourself may have created.I have actively participated in numerous staff threads, contributed to the community by assisting with Ant and others, and have been involved in various other staff-related tasks.
Considering these factors, it appears that the report against me was unfounded and motivated by animosity, especially after you acknowledged that the previous report from RaveeCPN was false.
Getting into motives is only gonna poison the well further so I suggest we don't get into thatI hate her, I'll admit that much, but I'm not doing this out of hate. I'm doing it out of her breaking the rules tens of times.
I can't do that. That's a Thread Mod and up jobYou can simply delete my two comments but I think it was worth mentioning, even if the user above despises me in every aspect.
While I agree with the sentiment, unfortunately, by the fact we haven't got a record of the many incidents, coupled with the fact that research on it would still be severely limited with simple facts such as "did they ask beforehand and the staff in question forgot", it wouldn't be right to punish Dread now. She's got the equivalent of a warning and we will take a better look at the matter going forward. That's the best we can do with things as they are.In fairness though, by letting cases continue to go under the radar like this, it only becomes more of an issue. If other people are also doing this, crack down on that as well.
One:The report you filed against me seems to have been hastily put together and lacked sufficient evidence. The provided link was invalid, preventing me from adequately defending myself and requiring me to conduct my own research. This raises concerns about the fairness of the process from my perspective.
Furthermore, you made a significant accusation and claimed that you would provide evidence to support it. I have actively participated in numerous staff threads, contributed to the community by assisting with Ant and others, and have been involved in various other staff-related tasks.
Considering these factors, it appears that the report against me was unfounded and motivated by animosity, especially after you acknowledged that the previous report from RaveeCPN was false.
This is my last post but if you think I need to prove your own claim, then you are wrong. I am not obligated to.
And nobody else has? We either ban all of them or none of them and last I checked we don't have written legislation against asking mods for permission off-site.I'll say this though, someone doing something that lots of others do doesn't make them any better.
She should still get a punishment.
It's not about having a grudge against her, either.
I hate her, I'll admit that much, but I'm not doing this out of hate. I'm doing it out of her breaking the rules tens of times.
If that's the best that can be done atm with what we've got, fair enough. In general I feel this issue of non-staff commenting on staff threads without permission needs to be given more attention than it currently doesWhile I agree with the sentiment, unfortunately, by the fact we haven't got a record of the many incidents, coupled with the fact that research on it would still be severely limited with simple facts such as "did they ask beforehand and the staff in question forgot", it wouldn't be right to punish Dread now. She's got the equivalent of a warning and we will take a better look at the matter going forward. That's the best we can do with things as they are.
No no, I'm not talking about the og report, Abstractions actually told me and others that she gave her permission as well.And nobody else has? We either ban all of them or none of them and last I checked we don't have written legislation against asking mods for permission off-site.
If any written legislation were to be made, punishment will come only if the infraction came after the legislation was put into place. We do not punish retroactively. That would be very dumb.
Oh, so you're happy to pull up evidence and context for other reports but mine is too hard for you to do that?In which world I am obligated to do your own work to prove your claim right?
Like guys? Anyone hearing this right? Why should I prove his claim to be accurate