- 9,055
- 9,318
Or they don't agree with your conclusions.
Now, enough derailment on this. Let staff come to a conclusion on the report.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
Now, enough derailment on this. Let staff come to a conclusion on the report.
- 7,237
- 13,113
Accusing people of being "unwilling to acknowledge the facts" simply because they didn't arrive at the same conclusion that you did is textbook stonewalling.
Infractions are a reason unto themselves for a report. Fashioning this as a personal vendetta rather than a consequence of your decision to drag out a very pointless argument that it wasn't a downgrade thread does not reflect well.
- 17,765
- 17,261
It's pretty debatable that lying about a member's intent and twisting it to keep a CRT from being passed is minor.
And Weekly, I can pretty confidently say that no one here gives that much of a damn about you that they try to get you every time you show up to a thread.
You've messed up and got reported. That's it.
- 61,134
- 14,530
My guy. The argument is that Singularity is only Low 1-C based on scaling to existence erasure. The counterargument is that, even on his own ******* profile, the reasoning for him being Low 1-C is that he physically beat the shit out of people who are physically Low 1-C. This isnt 'they dont agree with my conclusions', this is them straight up ignoring facts and evidence that is on the profile and that has been presented to them numerous times. The CRT itself is highly manipulative and is leaving out a shit ton of evidence that was ignored by the people who agreed with it. Do not accuse me of stonewalling when im doing the opposite of it.
- 61,134
- 14,530
Why do i keep getting told to stop when multiple other people keep bringing it up as well? Tell them to stop too.
- 9,055
- 9,318
I did. Both Planck and Deagon then focused on your report and your actions.
So yes. Stop.
- 17,765
- 17,261
So, now you do agree that it was a proper CRT, not just a clarification? Which means Milly's original accusation was correct? Good to have that settled. You clearly have no proper clue of why you're on this thread.
I'll give you a hint; it's not cause you think a character is fully Tier 1 and we're being doodoo heards.
- 9,055
- 9,318
Weekly already acknowledged this earlier. This is unnecessary.
- 17,765
- 17,261
Didn't see it properly. That's my bad then.
- 9,055
- 9,318
For those that missed it. (
- 7,237
- 13,113
What I was bringing up wasn't the details of the argument. For my part, I couldn't care less about Bayonetta. It is a matter of your behavior. Your repeated insistence that you are objectively correct, no room for argument, and everyone else (including the current 4-0 staff vote against your opinion) is just ignoring the facts, being manipulative, biased, et cetera.
My objection to this behavior should not be taken as a cue to repeat the reasons you believe you're correct. This is the critical point here: This behavior is problematic even if you are correct. It adds nothing to the discussion and simply gets on everyone's nerves to have someone constantly reminding everyone in the thread of their belief that they are objectively right and there's no room for argument. That won't stop people from discussing it further or from disagreeing with you.
- 21,131
- 30,084
Can all of yall like... you know... be quiet?
Going back and forth with each other kinda doesn't do shit for the report at hand
Going back and forth with each other kinda doesn't do shit for the report at hand
- 21,131
- 30,084
And I won't even lie, that doesn't even look like a CRT.
It being opened as "Clarifications on ________", with the entire OP being "why is it like this? It looks like this would be ___" is giving Q&A.
If I say "why was the higher end of this calc on the profiles? It looks to me like the lower one was accepted", that isn't a downgrade.
It being in the CRT section genuinely doesn't mean anything cause we move threads to different sections depending on the matter at hand.
If you genuinely want this to be a downgrade CRT, I suggest you formulate it like one, cause it definitely looks like a Q&A with a "shouldn't it be this?" rating at the end. Even if it's later changed to a downgrade CRT, at least change the OP up or something.
Also, @WeeklyBattles, regardless of if you're right or wrong in the situation, please stop with the victim mentality
Not everybody is out for your head
Also
Let's not assume the intentions of the OP, not cool
- 61,134
- 14,530
Im not assuming the intentions of the CRT
Singularity
Singularity, known as The Crafted Tyrant, was the first person to uncover the truth of the multiverse and the creator of the Homunculi. Singularity was created as an abnormal product at a plant specializing in the production of artificial body parts and became a self aware artificial human...
vsbattles.fandom.com
This is the character in question. Note how their AP justification is not solely based on scaling to Existence Erasure, yet the OP acts like that is the only reason why he is Low 1-C. And on top of this, multiple reasons for why he is Low 1-C physically have been presented in the thread since it started, and all have been ignored.
- 21,131
- 30,084
The OP could be ignorant of the AP justification at hand (which is why they asked for clarification of the Singularity in the first place) instead of willfully ignoring the justification.
Regardless, just don't.
Regardless, just don't.
- 61,134
- 14,530
Problem with that is Milly outright said in this RVT that she is knowledgeable on Bayonetta which is why she got mad at me for thinking she wasnt
- 15,779
- 5,688
Gotta disagree with you there, KT. For one, I didn’t ask a single question on the crt to begin with. You can see edit history (the only thing I changed was vote tally), and I never asked a single question. And even in the first passage, I stated I had some concerns, which aren’t exactly synonymous with questions. This also isn’t the first time a crt has been done with that name, see here.
Also, this cannot be the case, because I made the justification for it in the first place. I could even get you the rough draft that I made to prove it.
- 21,131
- 30,084
Why do I even bother
- 15,779
- 5,688
I never got mad, I said I don’t know why you kept doing that, lmao.
- 15,779
- 5,688
Anyways, again, I’m going back to silence until mod verdict.
- 15,779
- 5,688
No, Weekly is fully aware of his actions. He heavily insists that my thread was not a CRT, therefore there’s nothing to accept, solely because I disagree with him, despite earlier, he says this:
So, no, this was an active, aware, and malicious attempt to try and misconstrue the structure of my thread.
- 15,779
- 5,688
Okay, if this is your stance, how many more “he isn’t mentally all there” excuses can we give him? Because multiple other people seemed to understand that it was not a Q&A.
- 61,134
- 14,530
While i was, and still am, frustrated at stuff going on in that thread, i do admit i overstepped by doing what i did and i apologize for doing so.
- 13,900
- 5,395
sorry to intrude, but
that's all I have to say about this.
just my personal take, I'd advise that you take a bit more of a sidelined role on the site from now on, since afaik this seems to be a bit of a cycle...it would probably be the best way to save yourself from being banned now or in the future...
that's all I have to say about this.
- 165,160
- 72,095
- Thread starter
- #19,909
It is a minor issue, so I personally think that it warrants a minor warning at the very most, especially given Weekly's mental incoherence. Serious transgressions would be a very different issue.
- 165,160
- 72,095
- Thread starter
- #19,910
Thank you. Please take what Ziller said into account.
- 165,160
- 72,095
- Thread starter
- #19,911
- 19,345
- 9,935
Commenting on the Weekly situation, he's been acting really similar to what happened when RWBY got a calc downgraded, only instead of bribing someone he's just constantly begging people on discord servers to agree with his side of the argument so the Bayonetta stats don't get downgraded.
On our site we have a rule on offsite stuff that follows:
Off-site behavior is usually irrelevant except in cases of:
On our site we have a rule on offsite stuff that follows:
Off-site behavior is usually irrelevant except in cases of:
- Actions that lead to the destabilization of the site (such as videos, forum posts, Discord chats, etc. that create drama), whether or not it was systematic. To determine what counts as destabilization of the site one should mostly look at the consequences of said act rather than the individual act itself.
- 61,134
- 14,530
Trying to report me for another joke i see
- 19,345
- 9,935
@WeeklyBattles Nothing in the scans remotely implies it's a joke, neither do any of the responses really imply it being a joke either. Either way I've made my report, I'll let the staff decide.
- 7,899
- 8,155
Honestly, this isn't even a joke at all, I saw you begging for others to agree with you on threads in that server many times, especially for RWBY.
- 61,134
- 14,530
Glass, my guy, you of all people should not be the one making this report, everyone knows you dislike me, anyone who has seen us in the same thread for more than five replies knows this. Even if this was me seriously asking for people to agree with me (The fact that its just a spammed response should be a dead giveaway that its not serious smh), literally everyone on Discord does this, there are entire channels dedicated to asking people for input and agreements on threads. Furthermore, not only is the thread in question one that is already in favor of the argument i am making, but the thread in question is quite literally a minor justification adjustment that does not even affect the tiers of the verse, nor does this destabalize the wiki in any way shape or form.
Ive already discussed this with Lephyr and Ant and they do not think this is report-worthy. I would appreciate it if you stoppd trying to witch hunt me over nothing.
- 61,134
- 14,530
It is a joke yes, at this point it seems likeim going to have to start putting /s next to every joke i make as it seems people are looking to purposely misinterpret every joke or non-serious remark i say as something completely serious.
- 14,888
- 12,400
A lot of those screenshots are irrelevant to what you're claiming.
The first four, sure. It's just asking anyone in a server for agreements, and saying that people do so blindly all the time.
But the last three are different.
One of them is seemingly minutes after the first four, providing concrete arguments for his side. Implying that he's not blindly doing so without arguments, as you go on to claim.
The other is seemingly 10 hours beforehand, just saying that it sucks that people count votes from staff members who are biased. That is wholly unrelated to this report.
The other is seemingly 10 hours beforehand, just giving reasons why he thinks you're biased. That is wholly unrelated to this report. Why are you even including these and labeling them as him begging for agreements?
With the context of the fifth screenshot, coming immediately after those messages, it doesn't seem like blind voting. The wall of "i need agreements etc." post seems pretty bad out of context, but I can see, was in response to someone else shitposting.
And, soon after, there was another bout of him posting actual arguments before asking for a vote.
The response to Tllm does seem like a pretty shitty attitude, but all-in-all, doesn't seem like something worth punishing over.
Please post those so we can properly understand them. Maybe those will tip the scales.
- 61,134
- 14,530
My guy, i was already banned for that before, not sure why youre trying to use it like its something i did again
Also your first link is broken
- 9,740
- 12,604
A joke would be a single post with pretty obvious irony, these are spammed posts in different servers. This is clearly not a bit
I mean usually we wouldn’t want people to be sarcastic in these threads, but this is legitimate evidence so…yeah, this is only proving the fact that it’s not a joke further
I think some action should be taken
Similar threads
