• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

What about sniper? Clover mentioned Sniper isn't completely innocent in This either
Yeah I was clarifying tiokill case that it has ended and for sniper I am not sure, clover seems to more of clarifying his position as offense aginst offense.
But yeah sniper has a role in not being rational during the thread that clover as well has mentioned. So his case is still open ig.
 
So you're accusing me too
He is not accusing but simply giving his opinion on the report, the thread hasn't got derailed even by a little bit and all what has been asked or mentioned is actually related to the OP, official translations if correct holds priority over the machine(don't mean much anyway) or even human translations outside of official media. So this yet has to be judged.
 
Though, I forgot to respond to this, what posts specifically are his reports? I do remember he has had a temporary ban before for similar behaviors iirc.
I forgot when the Ban was and for what reason.
As for snipers remarks against TioKill here.
Sniper is also repetitive with his argument before it spiraled into a mess.

Sniper reaction isn't really as inflammatory as Tiokill but insults were hurled. For the record Sniper also decided to unfollow the thread instead of continuing debate.
 
Though, I forgot to respond to this, what posts specifically are his reports? I do remember he has had a temporary ban before for similar behaviors iirc.
Being ignorant to opposition(Styrlum and tiokill) response and keep stating the same thing.

Even after being told that why infinite Pokemons on finite Pokemon planet is clearly a hyperbole, he was still arguing and was giving unrelated examples.

Also tiokill first annoyed reply was on sniper still arguing over infinite Pokemons to be a thing, even after being explained by 2 ppls more than once that why it's not.

Tiokill way of talk is usually looks tough (even quite normal replies), it's just way to talk. He didn't really said anything offensive(not at all) untill saw him still arguing over infinite Pokemons stuff.

Ig what happens afterwards @TheGreatJedi13 has already quoted.
 
Last edited:
I apologize for my assertiveness on regular replies. English is not my first language, so I'm not sure how to words things in a better manner sometimes. I'll try harder to maintain debates healthy.
I should've just described Sniper's Ad Infinitum as "a childish behavior" instead of using harsh words like calling him a child outright. My question about cognitive disability was not an attempt to mock him - I mistook "cognitive disability" with the inability to interpret texts and lines, which I know learn is called "Functionally Illiterate".
 
I apologize for my assertiveness on regular replies. English is not my first language, so I'm not sure how to words things in a better manner sometimes. I'll try harder to maintain debates healthy.
I should've just described Sniper's Ad Infinitum as "a childish behavior" instead of using harsh words like calling him a child outright. My question about cognitive disability was not an attempt to mock him - I mistook "cognitive disability" with the inability to interpret texts and lines, which I know learn is called "Functionally Illiterate".
Yeah sometimes disorders don't fully stop people from functioning right.
I and a friend of mine have autism and ADHD and yet we can communicate with others and comprehend them for the most part.
Just wanted to share that because I feel like some people think certain mental disorders will completely mess you up which isn't always true.
 
Well, I am als autistic with ADHD, and used to be psychotic on top of that due to very bad overmedication. It mainly makes me obsessive, unfiltered, and to get very stressed out about horrible events in the world at large.

Anyway, there doesn't seem to be a problem here, and we already gave a warning earlier.
 
Maybe there should be directions when someone first joins the site on what to do if they want to add something to someone's profile and who to ask about it, if there aren't already.
Just a suggestion.
 
Unless they make an account here in Xenforo, then yes it is possible to do an automation message for it, but I doubt any new users who do edits first will join the wiki first.
 
Makes no sense, since the account is a fandom and not a wiki. So there is no way there will be an automation system to give automatic welcome messages once they are in our wiki.
I have asked Fandom to reactivate our automatic welcome messages for new members on several occasions, but they have not wanted to do so, for reasons that I do not recall anymore, so I started to manually post the following message of the VSB wiki walls of most new members that I notice instead.

"Please read the following page for instructions regarding how to become a productive member of this community:

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Welcome_Message "
 
I've reverted the edits and gave a warning+instructions to the user.
Regarding this. The same user edit the same page again but instead of changing the stats what they did was to add the following "Bokep ngentot" just by googling it I realized that it practically links you to a bunch of **** sites. So I have permanently banned the user for the time being, if you somehow think the ban is too much or something, it is open for discussion then which i obviously doubt.
 
I definitely think a permaban is justified; vandalism is a serious offense, and mentioning pornographic stuff that's really hard to do by accident which means it is pretty much most likely blatant trolling.

Though side note, I didn't know Content Mods had banning rights on the wiki now, unless I am forgetting an announcement that mentions that.
 
Though side note, I didn't know Content Mods had banning rights on the wiki now, unless I am forgetting an announcement that mentions that.
I have Administrator rights to take care of anything related to cleaning up blogs, categories in blog post, etc, they were given to me here and I still use them to this day in projects and requests. Also, I spoke with Ant and he gave me permission to block vandals in this cases and that's why I report them here as well.
 
Regarding this. The same user edit the same page again but instead of changing the stats what they did was to add the following "Bokep ngentot" just by googling it I realized that it practically links you to a bunch of **** sites. So I have permanently banned the user for the time being, if you somehow think the ban is too much or something, it is open for discussion then which i obviously doubt.
I'm sorry if I'm not supposed to be here, but I want to set a few things straight, "Bok*p" in Indonesian is a **** video and "ngent*t" is Indonesian slang referring to activity of having sex. bok*p can also mean the activity of having sex
 
I'm sorry if I'm not supposed to be here, but I want to set a few things straight, "Bok*p" in Indonesian is a **** video and "ngent*t" is Indonesian slang referring to activity of having sex. bok*p can also mean the activity of having sex
Thank you for the clarification, but it still refers to sexual activities and **** practically just googling it, besides the fact that they had previously vandalized the same page and I had given them instructions and a warning and they ignored them.
 
Yes, this ban seems fine to me, although it is better if Dereck03 asks our official administrators to handle bans unless there is a vandal troll that needs to urgently be dealt with before they cause more harm.
 
Back
Top