- 11,687
- 18,303
I'm gonna preface my response by saying that I don't think Sniper is off the hook at all, I think both Sniper and TioKill are in the wrong here.
You also questioned if Sniper had a disability out of personal annoyance with their arguments, that goes beyond the scope of what should be reasonable as an annoyed response.
I've noticed this in other threads you've been in as well, you need to stop getting so heated over fictional characters beating the crap out of each other. It's not that deep.
Edit: Yikes
I can understand being annoyed, that's fine, but looking at your responses in the thread, I think you took it too far.So let me get this straight -
- Person dedicates and provokes a debate on the OP's behalf
- Purposely Ad Infinitum everything I say, which is - to be tame - annoying at the very least
For the first quote, it could also be said Sniper was saying that in response to your own offensive "I'm debating with a child" reply. And the second quote is in the same position, and it honestly doesn't even seem as bad compared to what it was replying to: you referring to them as a barely functional manchild. The NPC comment was unnecessary coming from another party though, yeah.
- Replies to my annoyed comments with the exact same kind of toxicity:
- "YOU REPEAT THE EXACT SAME SHIT."
- "Completely unaffected by this. When you consider the fact that it's coming from a Clown"
- Even Sniper's personal supporter was saying toxic shit too: "Bro is an NPC", and yes, if we're considering me saying his points are dumb to be offensive, calling me an NPC to insult my intelligence is also offensive, it's either or none
You also questioned if Sniper had a disability out of personal annoyance with their arguments, that goes beyond the scope of what should be reasonable as an annoyed response.
I've noticed this in other threads you've been in as well, you need to stop getting so heated over fictional characters beating the crap out of each other. It's not that deep.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but whether or not you acknowledge the warning doesn't actually mean anythingbut nah, you say that to HIM too, otherwise I refuse to acknowledge this warning.
Edit: Yikes