Risky Durability Downgrade

[Arrogant_Schmuck]

I can't imagine I'll be met with much resistance considering I'm the only one on planet Earth who's read these books, and you would all be better off leaving it that way but for the sake of formality here's a CRT anyway.

As you'll see if you go to Ereskigal's page, she is 8-A via temporarily withstanding the heat of the sun's core.

"Temporarily" being the operative word.

She was clearly pushing her durability here, to the point where it eventually was too much. Therefore, she should not have Town level durability.

Simple enough, I think.

 

[MrKingOfNegativity]

Seems reasonable.

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

If the 7-C feat is legit, then this just seems like another anti-feat? Does it contradict the 7-C feat so hard as to make it an outlier? Because given that 7-C is from Striking Strength, you'll have to remove it from this profile entirely.

 

[Arrogant_Schmuck]

Can you explain what you just said differently?

 

[Andytrenom]

If it's only an attack described as being the temperature of the sun, then it doesn't need to be 8-A. It could easily scale to 7-C if that feat is legit.

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

tl;dr a 7-C character dying to a 8-A thing does not automatically disprove the 7-C feat. Would the 7-C feat be an outlier now due to this?

 

[Arrogant_Schmuck]

At one point Risky said that she believed she could finish her mother off if the latter was considerably weakened. Just the prelude to her mother's reawakening caused earthquakes estimated to have been between 6.3 to 6.4 on the Richter scale.

That's what I based her 7-C rating on. I know this would probably be better if I could get actual scans but the book is on my tablet which is currently a couple of hours away from me.