• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Reviewing Acausality Type 5 in profile pages

Status
Not open for further replies.
I actually said that exact argument on the first page. But I got the response that the interaction statements need to be mentioned anyway.
I personally found it absurd to need a statement such as no interaction. There is probably such an expression in dkd, but there should be no need for it in my opinion.
 
Basically.... if a profile list TD, BDE, HDE, NEP, AE type 1. Or some other incorporal existence.



Your not getting Type 5 Acausality because the "well they can't be interacted with" will just shift from Acausality to some other ability of those other types.
Even if it doesn't, you still won't get it unless it mentions the reason for it is being outside causality
 
I'm reading this thread. Amd I was thinking...



Basically.... if a profile list TD, BDE, HDE, NEP, AE type 1. Or some other incorporal existence.



Your not getting Type 5 Acausality because the "well they can't be interacted with" will just shift from Acausality to some other ability of those other types.



Effectively making it the hardest ability to get on the wiki, and it's no longer an NLF super Invulnerability hax that protects you from smurf abilities either.



So if a character has 6D type 4 Acausality. It suddenly becomes >>>> type 5 Acausality. This contradicts what type 5 Acausality is and is supposed to be. To my understanding and knowledge*
According to acusalty definition 6D type 4 <3D type 5
 
Even if it doesn't, you still won't get it unless it mentions the reason for it is being outside causality
What I'm trying to say there is

If a profile has all of those listed and was Type 5 Acausality by previous standards and is now getting downgraded.

It's probably because the Acausality is getting nuked because it can be explained by another ability such as the ones being mentioned.
 
I personally found it absurd to need a statement such as no interaction. There is probably such an expression in dkd, but there should be no need for it in my opinion.
Yeah bcz in fate [] is the absolute being in the verse, nobody is able to have an interaction feat + description of it are impossible so the feat in itself can't exist.
According to acusalty definition 6D type 4 <3D type 5
it was changed in the same thread that everything mention in the OP, acausality type 5 can be affected by higher dimmensionnal being
 
According to acusalty definition 6D type 4 <3D type 5
Basically this is how we're treating it by current standards.

6D Type 4 Acausality will be more effective than Type 5 Acausality thar has no cosmological explanation/context.

Thus making 6D Type 4 Ac > Type 5. Amd that 6D T4 AC in theory (with context) could merk the floor of that lower lifeforms type 5 AC being.

Thus either something is wrong and needs changed or nuke type 5 AC
 
I actually think anos is the only character that seems to base the acusalty type 5 entirely on TD 2. Descriptions starting with type because and descriptions starting with TD 2 because they looked exactly the same to me.
 
Yeah bcz in fate [] is the absolute being in the verse, nobody is able to have an interaction feat + description of it are impossible so they feat in itself can't exist.

it was changed in the same thread that everything mention in the OP, acausality type 5 can be affected by higher dimmensionnal being
I guess I missed that. The power of acausality has taken a solid blow.
 
Imagine, Type 5 acausality was one of the most broken shit there was, and even higher D ******* couldn't touch you if they didn't have feats.

Now, not only the standards are extremely hard for a character to qualify for, but someone higher D than you could **** the shit out of you regardless if you have it.

What a ******* turbo nerf.
 
The definition of type 5 officially says that you cannot defeat it by being higher dimensional, but is it renewed now? hmm somewhat surprising. that is, we accept that someone with type 5 does not exceed an acusalty system with 1A. The word "all causality systems" in type 5 also seemed to me to evaporate.
 
How can a type 5 still depend on verse cosmology? If it still depends on a certain causality, how does it become type 5, that is, "exceeds all causality systems", isn't it a contradiction in itself?
 
Imagine, Type 5 acausality was one of the more broken shit there was, and even higher D ******* couldn't touch you if they didn't have feats.

Now, not only the standards are extremely hard for a character to qualify for, but someone higher D than you could **** the shit out of you regardless if you have it.

What a ******* turbo nerf.
NEP is still incon.
So yeah, Aca 5 left us and fell from its grace.

Only NEP now.
 
How can a type 5 still depend on verse cosmology? If it still depends on a certain causality, how does it become type 5, that is, "exceeds all causality systems", isn't it a contradiction in itself?
Random example

If a verses cosmology has a low 1-A multiverse and it is all inside the system of causality. A character awakens and transcends the multiverse which is very detailed detailedly explained to be within the system of causality is thus transcending the causality of the multiverse. That could have potential for low 1-A T4 AC

I say type 4 because character still get interacted with under certain circumstances thus debunking him as type 5.

Edit: I think I misread your question
 
How can a type 5 still depend on verse cosmology? If it still depends on a certain causality, how does it become type 5, that is, "exceeds all causality systems", isn't it a contradiction in itself?
Same way a character is "omnipotent" without being tier 0, aka, basic NLFs, cope, seethe, mald.
 
Same way a character is "omnipotent" without being tier 0, aka, basic NLFs, cope, seethe, mald.
then let's remove acusalty type 5 as we did with omnipotent. It's ridiculous to say don't say but let's give it a b. It goes beyond all causality systems, but if it is around its own verse, this type should be 4 or we should remove 5 completely and make it 4 because as far as I can see, there is no difference from 4 in this state.
 
I don't think it is necessary to continue debating this; no character currently qualifies for Type 5. I am going to change Anos Aca 5 to Higher Degree of Type 4.
So we remove it, as we did in omnipotence? The concept of this is nigh-impossible to achieve.
 
Now, as far as I can see in this discussion, what we call type 5 is just like the higher version of type 4 as a base line. Type 4, but it is higher than a normal type 4, there is no need to evaluate it as a separate acusalty.
 
I am honestly being honest here. Acc type 5 concept (main sole of this nature) is being beyond all the systems and impossible to be interacted with.
If there are good statements of the first requirement, but there is no statement of the second requirement, we need to search for anti-feats. If there are no anti-feats, add it as acc type 5.
 
I am honestly being honest here. Acc type 5 concept (main sole of this nature) is being beyond all the systems and impossible to be interacted with.
If there are good statements of the first requirement, but there is no statement of the second requirement, we need to search for anti-feats. If there are no anti-feats, add it as acc type 5.
Not us to decide tho.
 
I am honestly being honest here. Acc type 5 concept (main sole of this nature) is being beyond all the systems and impossible to be interacted with.
If there are good statements of the first requirement, but there is no statement of the second requirement, we need to search for anti-feats. If there are no anti-feats, add it as acc type 5.
pretty sure you don't need to be beyond all possible systems of causality to have it. They even adjusted it to the point that Acausality Type 5 in tier 2 doesn't mean you are beyond the system of causality in tier 1 on each dimensional hierarchy. so even someone who would qualify for this in a tier 2 structure wouldn't need to transcend the system of causality in a tier 1 structure to have it.
which IMO is contradictory and doesn't make sense with how ridiculous the standard requirement they make this ability to be. and the fact that you are TD2 in a tier 2 structure with both regular and irregular systems of causality should be enough but I guess it doesn't.
this thread is a mess. I was hoping it would discuss varieties of Type 5 in different fiction to understand it better but it just became a slugfest of profile discussion that do not meet the standard
 
pretty sure you don't need to be beyond all possible systems of causality to have it. They even adjusted it to the point that Acausality Type 5 in tier 2 doesn't mean you are beyond the system of causality in tier 1 on each dimensional hierarchy. so even someone who would qualify for this in a tier 2 structure wouldn't need to transcend the system of causality in a tier 1 structure to have it.
which IMO is contradictory and doesn't make sense with how ridiculous the standard requirement they make this ability to be. and the fact that you are TD2 in a tier 2 structure with both regular and irregular systems of causality should be enough but I guess it doesn't.
this thread is a mess. I was hoping it would discuss varieties of Type 5 in different fiction to understand it better but it just became a slugfest of profile discussion that do not meet the standard
So to understand better right now

1 layer into boundless tier + of transcendence of all systems of causality in that said tier < 2 layers into boundless tier + + of transcendence of all systems of causality in that said tier
 
So to understand better right now

1 layer into boundless tier + of transcendence of all systems of causality in that said tier < 2 layers into boundless tier + + of transcendence of all systems of causality in that said tier
What...?
 
So to understand better right now

1 layer into boundless tier + of transcendence of all systems of causality in that said tier < 2 layers into boundless tier + + of transcendence of all systems of causality in that said tier
basically. but IIRC once you reach the boundless tier. Causality and systems are pretty much irrelevant already so that's not a good example to have. There is a reason it is called "Boundless"
 
I was asking a question about how I understand your statement. You said that Acausality Type 5 in tier 2 is weaker than Acausality Type 5 in tier 1
basically. but IIRC once you reach the boundless tier. Causality and systems are pretty much irrelevant already so that's not a good example to have
What about tier 1?

Also, is it not supposed to be acc type 5 = beyond all system in that said verse? So if there is one character that is acc type 5 tier 2 in that verse, the tier 1 character still can't interact with him.
 
Also, is it not supposed to be acc type 5 = beyond all system in that said verse? So if there is one character that is acc type 5 tier 2 in that verse, the tier 1 character still can't interact with him.
not sure about this one to be honest. All I remember was that. We cannot assume a character from a verse that is only tier 2 on its limit that is type 5 acausal to be beyond even a Tier 1 of a different verse which is likely to have a different system of causality for being qualitatively superior in dimension/reality.

As for within verse that wasn't discussed but this case is relatively very rare
 
not sure about this one to be honest. All I remember was that. We cannot assume a character from a verse that is only tier 2 on its limit that is type 5 acausal to be beyond even a Tier 1 of a different verse which is likely to have a different system of causality for being qualitatively superior in dimension/reality.

As for within verse that wasn't discussed but this case is relatively very rare
Makes sense, but even this is a controversial topic.
 
Tier 0 is a normal tier just like any other tier, they don't have those physiology by default
tbh I'd like to disagree because that wouldn't make sense. taking in unconventional physiology granted by Higher-dimensional existence. but that is just my opinion to it
 
tbh I'd like to disagree because that wouldn't make sense. taking in unconventional physiology granted by Higher-dimensional existence. but that is just my opinion to it
It is my opinion as well, but I asked this once ago about boundless tier 0, and as he said, it is still a tier like any other.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top