- 4,639
- 3,241
Avatar Creation truly is the godsent of Acausality Type 5.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Reviewing Acausality Type 5 in profile pages
- Thread starter Everything12
- Start date
-
- Tags
- acausality
- Status
- 6,300
- 1,599
Perhaps the only one to get it.
- 18,393
- 14,310
Is that ability or a character? I can't find it
- 6,300
- 1,599
Someone make a new staff thread about the Acausality type 5 issues with current standards lol
TheGreatJedi13
Username Only- 5,196
- 3,337
Going back to the topic at hand. I think this Thread is too much for a single knowledgeable member. Maybe assistance from staff who assisted the change in Acausal Type 5 might help with further evaluation. One person deciding whether a character fits the bill doesn't really sit right with me no matter how knowledgeable they are in the topic.
- 4,639
- 3,241
It's an Ability.
"I interacted with you so you have Causality"
"Nah fam it was an Avatar, my true self ain't messing with u"
- 18,393
- 14,310
Should I? This seems to be discussed with multiple members and staff members. Either nuking it or making the ability standards easier.
- 2,304
- 736
That would just mitigate anti feats tho.
- 6,300
- 1,599
Also elaborating more on the contradiction that current standards make higher levels of type 4 > type 5
But yes someone should
- 4,639
- 3,241
Exactly, if you have Avatar Creation any Anti-Feats of interaction can be entirely ignored. Then you just need statements of being beyond Cause and Effect and being untouchable/uninteractable.
- 11,121
- 19,375
Still the same tho...
- 4,933
- 2,796
I say we add a new type of Acausality.
Type 6- would be for those who currently qualify for the new standards
Type 5- would go back to the way it was before which is not requiring interaction statements or feats.
How are you supposed to have a story if you can't be interacted with?
Type 6- would be for those who currently qualify for the new standards
Type 5- would go back to the way it was before which is not requiring interaction statements or feats.
How are you supposed to have a story if you can't be interacted with?
- 2,304
- 736
Honestly if you really have such a clear statement of not being able to be interacted with because of lack of causality then any interaction should be a feat for the character that does the interaction rather then the anti feat for type 5 acausal
- 18,393
- 14,310
But the avatar is the one who gets interacted with. The character (main source/true form/concept) is still uninteractable and beyond all causality systems.
- 18,393
- 14,310
Seems type 6 is useless if you ask me. There is still no character to qualify for it. It is like an omnipotence concept (nigh impossible to achieve in fiction).
Alone, the concept of living in a system with no pure operating cause and effect is beyond our understanding. How can you explain it with your own understanding? It just becomes linear thinking for me.
- 4,933
- 2,796
Omnipotence is definitely possible. Just write another suggverse where the MC's power is "bullshit" the ability to do whatever tf they want
- 4,933
- 2,796
Lemme get this straight though.
So along with the currently impossible to achieve non interaction feats, Acausality 5 is no longer some omnipotent Invulnerability hax where even if you're tier 11, as long as you have type 5, even a tier 0 can't do shit to you?
This doesn't make sense. Why still define the ability as being beyond all systems of causality? Why should causality even be tied to dimensionality in the first place?
At this point, might as well nuke type 5 as its useless.
So along with the currently impossible to achieve non interaction feats, Acausality 5 is no longer some omnipotent Invulnerability hax where even if you're tier 11, as long as you have type 5, even a tier 0 can't do shit to you?
This doesn't make sense. Why still define the ability as being beyond all systems of causality? Why should causality even be tied to dimensionality in the first place?
At this point, might as well nuke type 5 as its useless.
- 18,393
- 14,310
- 2,304
- 736
You can still write domething beyond suggs so not omnipotent
- 18,393
- 14,310
Brother, he was joking dw
- 4,639
- 3,241
So where do you draw the line between Anti-Feat and Universal Property?
Like what's stopping someone from just saying;
"The Power System of this verse allows everyone with this power to interact with Acausality Type 5."
Like what's stopping someone from just saying;
"The Power System of this verse allows everyone with this power to interact with Acausality Type 5."
- 6,300
- 1,599
Let's stay focused here...
We might be frustrated, perplexed at the new standard. Wuth that someone should make a new staff thread about it.
For now let's stay focused on finding someone.. anyone. Who qualifies and nuke everyone else
We might be frustrated, perplexed at the new standard. Wuth that someone should make a new staff thread about it.
For now let's stay focused on finding someone.. anyone. Who qualifies and nuke everyone else
- 4,933
- 2,796
On a separate note though, regarding the new standards, we need to divide type 4 into sub categories as some type 4 with the new standards will clearly be beyond others.
Example: character A being said to transcend causality as a whole but lacks interaction statements (e.g anos, graham, Arceus) while character B is just in a separate system.
Character A is clearly superior to and far beyond B.
Something needs to be done about that
Example: character A being said to transcend causality as a whole but lacks interaction statements (e.g anos, graham, Arceus) while character B is just in a separate system.
Character A is clearly superior to and far beyond B.
Something needs to be done about that
- 18,393
- 14,310
Agreed if standards of type 5 won't be changed or nuked, we need to apply this. Someone need to create staff thread.
- 6,300
- 1,599
Make a staff thread about it?
Along with pointing out the huge contradiction between higher levels of type 4 vs baseline type 4 vs type 5
Along with the possibility of the type needing nuke because <10 characters qualify
- 4,639
- 3,241
Someone can make a CRT for that in the future, for now though we should do what Unspeakable stated.
- 11,121
- 19,375
- 4,933
- 2,796
I've been thinking more along the line of;
An author decides to start off a verse by saying
Isn't it basically impossible to get feats of non interaction with this?
- 18,393
- 14,310
According to new standards, this is not enough, sadly. The interaction statement should be mentioned explicitly, along with the fact it is because of causality.
- 4,933
- 2,796
Yeah we can do that and end up with less than a handful of characters having the ability.
Anyway we're all humans here, let's multitask
- 4,933
- 2,796
What if it also said those below them are incapable of interacting with them?
- 2,304
- 736
How can we even begin to talk about anti-feats when there are no feats in the first place?
- 4,639
- 3,241
In any case, Wendy from LDG qualified for Acausality Type 5 and still sort of follows the new guidelines.
She's unbound, separated, and disconnected from the laws of cause and effect.
Her "Acausality Type 5" state is confirmed to make her untouchable in terms of the rest of the world.
And when she finished her transformation into a sed state she is confirmed to make an Avatar to talk to her friend.
She's unbound, separated, and disconnected from the laws of cause and effect.
Her "Acausality Type 5" state is confirmed to make her untouchable in terms of the rest of the world.
And when she finished her transformation into a sed state she is confirmed to make an Avatar to talk to her friend.
- 18,393
- 14,310
Can you link the profile?
- 18,393
- 14,310
I asked same question way longer and I got ignored. Hence, the same case to Anos/Garham.
- 4,639
- 3,241
Sure here.
- 4,933
- 2,796
Another issue being from one of everything12 messages, the lines between type 4 & 5 are blurred.
Apparently, if you're only said to be in a different system of cause and effect but have non interaction feats/statements, then you're type 5
Apparently, if you're only said to be in a different system of cause and effect but have non interaction feats/statements, then you're type 5
- 18,393
- 14,310
- 18,393
- 14,310
I am sure it means you can't interact with other beings from a different system (cause and effect)
- Status
Similar threads
