- 5,387
- 4,297
Avatar Creation truly is the godsent of Acausality Type 5.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps the only one to get it.Avatar Creation truly is the godsent of Acausality Type 5.
Is that ability or a character? I can't find itAvatar Creation truly is the godsent of Acausality Type 5.
It's an Ability.Is that ability or a character? I can't find it
Should I? This seems to be discussed with multiple members and staff members. Either nuking it or making the ability standards easier.Someone make a new staff thread about the Acausality type 5 issues with current standards lol
That would just mitigate anti feats tho.It's an Ability.
"I interacted with you so you have Causality"
"Nah fam it was an Avatar, my true self ain't messing with u"
Also elaborating more on the contradiction that current standards make higher levels of type 4 > type 5Should I? This seems to be discussed with multiple members and staff members. Either nuking it or making the ability standards easier.
Exactly, if you have Avatar Creation any Anti-Feats of interaction can be entirely ignored. Then you just need statements of being beyond Cause and Effect and being untouchable/uninteractable.That would just mitigate anti feats tho.
Still the same tho...Exactly, if you have Avatar Creation any Anti-Feats of interaction can be entirely ignored. Then you just need statements of being beyond Cause and Effect and being untouchable/uninteractable.
Honestly if you really have such a clear statement of not being able to be interacted with because of lack of causality then any interaction should be a feat for the character that does the interaction rather then the anti feat for type 5 acausalExactly, if you have Avatar Creation any Anti-Feats of interaction can be entirely ignored. Then you just need statements of being beyond Cause and Effect and being untouchable/uninteractable.
But the avatar is the one who gets interacted with. The character (main source/true form/concept) is still uninteractable and beyond all causality systems.Honestly if you really have such a clear statement of not being able to be interacted with because of lack of causality then any interaction should be a feat for the character that does the interaction rather then the anti feat for type 5 acausal
Seems type 6 is useless if you ask me. There is still no character to qualify for it. It is like an omnipotence concept (nigh impossible to achieve in fiction).I say we add a new type of Acausality.
Type 6- would be for those who currently qualify for the new standards
Type 5- would go back to the way it was before which is not requiring interaction statements or feats.
How are you supposed to have a story if you can't be interacted with?
Omnipotence is definitely possible. Just write another suggverse where the MC's power is "bullshit" the ability to do whatever tf they wantSeems type 6 is useless if you ask me. There is still no character to qualify for it. It is like an omnipotence concept (nigh impossible to achieve in fiction).
Alone, the concept of living in a system with no pure operating cause and effect is beyond our understanding. How can you explain it with your own understanding? It just becomes linear thinking for me.
XDOmnipotence is definitely possible. Just write another suggverse where the MC's power is "bullshit" the ability to do whatever tf they want
You can still write domething beyond suggs so not omnipotentOmnipotence is definitely possible. Just write another suggverse where the MC's power is "bullshit" the ability to do whatever tf they want
Brother, he was joking dwYou can still write domething beyond suggs so not omnipotent
Agreed if standards of type 5 won't be changed or nuked, we need to apply this. Someone need to create staff thread.On a separate note though, regarding the new standards, we need to divide type 4 into sub categories as some type 4 with the new standards will clearly be beyond others.
Example: character A being said to transcend causality as a whole but lacks interaction statements (e.g anos, graham, Arceus) while character B is just in a separate system.
Character A is clearly superior to and far beyond B.
Something needs to be done about that
Make a staff thread about it?So where do you draw the line between Anti-Feat and Universal Property?
Like what's stopping someone from just saying;
"The Power System of this verse allows everyone with this power to interact with Acausality Type 5."
Someone can make a CRT for that in the future, for now though we should do what Unspeakable stated.On a separate note though, regarding the new standards, we need to divide type 4 into sub categories as some type 4 with the new standards will clearly be beyond others.
Example: character A being said to transcend causality as a whole but lacks interaction statements (e.g anos, graham, Arceus) while character B is just in a separate system.
Character A is clearly superior to and far beyond B.
Something needs to be done about that
anyone. Who qualifies and nuke everyone else
Literally we can't have an Ability for just 1, 2 or 3 characters.
I've been thinking more along the line of;So where do you draw the line between Anti-Feat and Universal Property?
Like what's stopping someone from just saying;
"The Power System of this verse allows everyone with this power to interact with Acausality Type 5."
Isn't it basically impossible to get feats of non interaction with this?this realm and all it's denizens along with all other possible realms/dimensions above it completely transcend, are beyond, outside, unbound from all levels of cause and effect.
The only reason they seem to follow some form of causality being that they're all beyond any level of causality
According to new standards, this is not enough, sadly. The interaction statement should be mentioned explicitly, along with the fact it is because of causality.I've been thinking more along the line of;
An author decides to start off a verse by saying
Isn't it basically impossible to get feats of non-interaction with this?
Yeah we can do that and end up with less than a handful of characters having the ability.Someone can make a CRT for that in the future, for now though we should do what Unspeakable stated.
What if it also said those below them are incapable of interacting with them?According to new standards, this is not enough, sadly. The interaction statement should be mentioned explicitly, along with the fact it is because of causality.
How can we even begin to talk about anti-feats when there are no feats in the first place?So where do you draw the line between Anti-Feat and Universal Property?
Like what's stopping someone from just saying;
"The Power System of this verse allows everyone with this power to interact with Acausality Type 5."
Can you link the profile?In any case, Wendy from LDG qualified for Acausality Type 5 and still sort of follows the new guidelines.
She's unbound, separated, and disconnected from the laws of cause and effect.
Her "Acausality Type 5" state is confirmed to make her untouchable in terms of the rest of the world.
And when she finished her transformation into a sed state she is confirmed to make an Avatar to talk to her friend.
I asked same question way longer and I got ignored. Hence, the same case to Anos/Garham.How can we even begin to talk about anti-feats when there are no feats in the first place?
Sure here.Can you link the profile?
Sure here.
Comment by @BobsicanWendy (Low Dimensional Game)
Being separate from cause and effect isn't enought on its own to have type 5 acausality anymore.
I am sure it means you can't interact with other beings from a different system (cause and effect)Another issue being from one of everything12 messages, the lines between type 4 & 5 are blurred.
Apparently, if you're only said to be in a different system of cause and effect but have non interaction feats/statements, then you're type 5