Regenerationn Update Project

[Elizhaa]

So, can this thread still be used for asking inputs since it is already highlighted and cover the topic or it is better to start another highlighted thread on the list, Antvasima?

 

[Antvasima]

I am not certain. This one has the attention of many members, but it has also derailed a lot.

 

[GyroNutz]

It'd be better if we made a new thread and this was changed to a q+a thread imo, since that's pretty much what it's been used for.

 

[Zaratthustra]

I think a new highlight with it should be made and the supporters of the said verses for the characters that have True-Godly should change it to a suitable one after these changes.

 

[Antvasima]

It'd be better if we made a new thread and this was changed to a q+a thread imo, since that's pretty much what it's been used for.

This makes sense to me.

 

[Elizhaa]

I don't mind this point. I think we should fused this idea to Dragonmasterxyz's idea on lettting the verse supporters handled their supported verse's Regenerationn updates. I think the new thread should strictly focus on True-Godly since it was removed from the Regenerationn page and get the pages with it to the Regenerationn's wiki standard.

 

[Elizhaa]

I made the thread: https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3943491

I think the thread should be highlighted

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

since a new thread is made i have a question

If a character is destroyed in mind, body, and soul, and they regenerate because their reliant on type 2 (or 3) concept

wouldn't that be low godly because they are regenerating due to a mechanism that is apart of their existence still present?

or am i misunderstanding somethng?

Low-Godly: The ability to regenerate from the complete physical destruction of the user's body, instead restoring it from their disembodied consciousness, whether that be their soul, mind, some other nonphysical aspect of themself, esoteric or metaphysical energy, or something else.

 

[Antvasima]

I highlighted the new thread.

 

[Elizhaa]

I highlighted the new thread.

Thanks. As discussed above. I think thread could be changed a Question and Answers thread.

 

[Lightbuster30]

Wouldn't conceptual erasure by definition include all aspects of your existence? We're talking about recovering from destruction of your very idea here.

At the very least this should be applied to verses that treat concepts as types 1-2, as those concepts are treated as shaping all of reality.

 

[Antoniofer]

Concept is a variable term, it may simply means soul, so "all aspect of existance" is a more solid definition; so people do nit get allured by simply stating stuff as conceptual.

 

[The_King_of_Prudence]

Unless the plot is above that. I wouldn't be surprised if souls were above even type 1 somewhere.

 

[Lightbuster30]

Concept is a variable term, it may simply means soul, so "all aspect of existance" is a more solid definition; so people do nit get allured by simply stating stuff as conceptual.

Hence why I edited my comment to clarify talking about verses that treat concepts as governing all reality.

 

[Antoniofer]

Would suggest to pay more atention in "what would happen if the 'concept' of this guy gets wiped?" rather than "what kind of concept this guy have?". Do not guide by names, but rather of how they works.

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

since a new thread is made i have a question
If a character is destroyed in mind, body, and soul, and they regenerate because their reliant on type 2 (or 3) concept

wouldn't that be low godly because they are regenerating due to a mechanism that is apart of their existence still present?

or am i misunderstanding somethng?

Low-Godly: The ability to regenerate from the complete physical destruction of the user's body, instead restoring it from their disembodied consciousness, whether that be their soul, mind, some other nonphysical aspect of themself, esoteric or metaphysical energy, or something else.

....

 

[Antvasima]

Antoniofer is correct.

Anyway, I moved this thread to questions and answers, as Elizhaa suggested.

 

[Antoniofer]

If destroyed in both form and essence and then regenerated, then is Mid-Godly, but since the character relies in another person, force or concept then is a "limited" Regenerationn (unless of course, the reason why it regenerate is due another part of its soul in safe elsewhere, in whose case is "limited" Low-Godly).

 

[GyroNutz]

Yeah it'd be Mid-Godly reliant on said type 2/3 concept.

 

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

If you could casually attack information that makes up the multiverse and it's concepts and hit someone, is that High-Godly Regen Neg?

 

[Bobsican]

If you could casually attack information that makes up the multiverse and it's concepts and hit someone, is that High-Godly Regen Neg?

That only falls as good Non Physical Interaction without further elaboration

 

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

That... doesn't seem right. Casually being able to erase and destroy the information that comprises the worlds multiverse and concepts and transcends it is only NPI?

 

[Bobsican]

Yeah, hence why I said more elaboration was needed, with the new clarification, it can qualify for Mid-Godly to High-Godly regen negation, I guess.

 

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

Alrighty. I'll gather more information later.

 

[GyroNutz]

Why would it be regen negation? It just means you can erase people who can't regenerate from having their information/concepts erased; a stronger erasure.

 

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

They regenerate from the entity that created all those concepts.

 

[Antoniofer]

That sounds more like that entity has Resurrection/Recreation rather than the other having Regenerationn.

 

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

I'm not sure if I know how to explain it properly, so I'll just leave it.