• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Regenerationn Update Project

Actually CHIM users can totally Zero Sum people. Considering even some mages are capable of such a feat, the literal Kings of the Aurbis doing it is child's play.

But this is neither the time nor the place.
 
Antvasima said:
This thread was originally intended to organise a revision project for all of the currently inaccurately tiered profiles
It might help by using Google search. For example:

"True-Godly" site:vsbattles.fandom.com
I will see if I can compilled a list of characters with True-Godly Regenerationn later.
 
Thank you for helping out Elizhaa. It is very appreciated.
 
We need to discuss which characters that qualify for which ratings.
 
A lot of characters would qualify for High godly for Blazblue, as well as their regen negations. Mostly scaling from Terumi's feat of regenerating from Time Killer, which is a far more potent EE than another EE in the series that can erase you from the past, present and future.
 
What is the verdict for characters that display mid godly regen, but they have no past, or future? Also for characters that are independent from/Of Time, or transcend time? Or the samething but with the word "History" in there a swell.
 
"History" for them would be subjective. It would matter for case to case. If they still had a state of "becoming" then it would probably have the context regarding that
 
It doesn't seem like we are getting any practical revision work done here.
 
Perhaps a separate thread for discussion of it should be made? Maybe a "Low to High Godly Q&A Thread?"

Edit: for people with questions*
 
^^

This could work.

Maybe, also, changing this thread to a Staff Only Thread could work
 
Well, we might need help with carrying out the revisions from regular members, so staff only does not seem appropriate, but starting two new continuation threads might be a good idea. One for questions, and one for practical revisions.
 
I guess it could works.

I am still compliling the list of characters with True-Godly so we could at least start this Regenerationn revision soon on True-Godly; I believed I could finish the list on this week Friday or Saturday.
 
Okay. Thank you for helping out so much. It is very appreciated.
 
@Ant is there anything I should clarify a bit more regarding the BlazBlue Regenerationn or does it look alright? I asked a few people about the type of Regenerationn in this thread and they said it counts for High godly
 
I feel like this should be handled on individual threads for series like Blazblue, Digimon, etc if there needs to be a regen change.
 
I also think that individual threads spinning out of the main revision thread might be best. First we could use the main thread to find the verses that need to be revised, and then these can be discussed individually unless the cases are very straightforward.
 
@Theglassman12

I do not know. Sorry, but it should take an awful lot to qualify for High Godly.
 
Antvasima said:
I also think that individual threads spinning out of the main revision thread might be best. First we could use the main thread to find the verses that need to be revised, and then these can be discussed individually unless the cases are very straightforward.
I agree it would work a good idea. Hasty Regenerationn upgrade would be lowered.
 
Yeah, this is what the list is for; characters with True-Godly Regenerationn will get their Regenerationn change to High-Godly
 
So, to clarify:

Low-Godly: Regenerating from complete destruction of body

Regenerating from complete bodily destruction and non-complete damage to the soul is high end Low-Godly

Regenerating from complete body damage and the destruction of the verse is top tier Low-Godly if specified that the soul was not destroyed

Mid-Godly: Regenerating from complete destruction of soul/mind/whatever

Regenerating from complete destruction of soul and destruction of universe is high end Mid-Godly

High-Godly: Regenerating from destruction of body, soul, and history, to the point that you never existed at all (meaning your erasure would alter history)

Regenerating from destruction of body, soul, and history along with the verse being destroyed is high end High-Godly

Regenerating from destruction of body, soul, and history along with the verse being destroyed by a tier 1 character is the absolute best Regenerationn, basically what True Godly amounted to. Only tier 0s, top tier Regenerationn negation, or certain hax can defeat them. If they are immune to regen negation of even the strongest kind as well as basically all hax possible, only a tier 0 character or otherwise omnipotent character (ie; The One Above All) can defeat them.
 
The problem is that characters that used to have True-Godly Regenerationn due to healing on a 1-A level, likely do not automatically qualify to High-Godly according to our new system.

I would appreciate input from other staff members about this though, especially Sera.
 
It would depend on if the character that was attempting to erase them specifically did so in a way that was supposed to make it so they never existed to begin with. I don't doubt that most 1-A characters could do that. As a sidenote, any character with Mid-Godly regen, the ability to regenerate in a void, and certain accausality, may as well have High-Godly. Also, theoretically, characters who have lower ends of high-godly Regenerationn may still be unable to regenerate if their verse is completely destroyed, while some characters with Mid-Godly could theoretically regenerate from having their verse destroyed provided they weren't erased from history itself. It all depends on how things are portrayed. For example, the Lernaean Hydra (Myth) had Mid Regenerationn because it could grow new heads, but it could only regrow heads, not any other bodyparts. It is technically possible for characters with lower Regenerationn ratings to 1-up characters with higher ones in certain specific areas. For example, a character who can regenerate from their severed head has High-Mid, but it's entirely possible they could only regenerate as long as their head (or brain) remains intact, while some other characters with Mid level can completely regrow new heads even if they are completely destroyed. In this sense, it is technically possible for a Mid-Godly character to be able to regenerate in a void even if their verse is completely destroyed, while some High-Godly ones couldn't.
 
@Frieza

" it is technically possible for a Mid-Godly character to be able to regenerate in a void even if their verse is completely destroyed, while some High-Godly ones couldn't."

That's because Regenerationn =/= the ability to survive in a timeless void
 
We doesn't have anything beyond of being wiped out from all aspects of existance, and "conceptual erasure" isn't above spiritual erasure most of the time; due that, the first part will be used to be the new High-Godly, and since there's nothing left to qualify it as True-Godly, its going to be removed.

Something like that, but not really good by paraphrasing revisions.
 
for high godly getting erased from narrative is required? or only a statement about getting erased at all aspects of existence is enough. because there is only a hanful amount of verses with narrative erasure.
 
Being erased in all ways available in the setting and coming back anyway should probably be enough.
 
Not necessarily. You need to start a highlighted thread that asks the community to help you evaluate whether or not the listed characters qualify case-by-case.
 
Back
Top