- 7,165
- 1,066
Wait, how do you know that it's complete annihilation of every single aspect?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The idea is that it would be relative to your verse. A verse that isn't a meta narrative couldn't very well be denied High Godly for not having its characters erased from its narrative. But on the other hand, if a purely conceptual being was destroyed on a conceptual level, as well as being destroyed as if they were never created, and they regenerated from that, it would have high godly regenShiroyashaGinSan said:Wait, how do you know that it's complete annihilation of every single aspect?
It would probably depend on the context of the verse which the feat comes fromDragonmasterxyz said:What do we define as "Information based" erasure?
I figure as much, but disagree that just saying "information destruction" would logically mean the same to any reasonable person reading the page. This is just going to make Sonic fans trying to give Mid-Godly regen to characters who recovered from having their driver's license stolen, or something like that, just because it sorta fits the words "information destruction" being said in True-Godly.Udlmaster said:Destroying your information.
For example, you see all reality as information, so if you was a ZIP file full of your information, and I chose to delete your "ZIP" File, you would not exist on any level, informational level is similar to conceptual, as it makes up all you are and ever was (Back up).
Sounds like an Aorigin being rather than Acausal.Eganergo said:What about acausal that has no past, future, or whatsoever. Does that instantly grant them high godly if they are erased?
Why wouldn't we be able to? If a character can return from having literally no facet or aspect of them remaining on any level, then that would apply to someone doing that in or to another verse.Eganergo said:Doesn't that mean we cannot equalize verse anymore in regards to regen and regen negation?
The Acausal being may not have history, but their actions would, they would affect the world around them.Eganergo said:@Udl
I'm refering to Acausal type 2 (and above?)
Tbh my problem is "destroying from history". Doesn't this mean everyone that has acausal type 2 are high godly as long as they can fulfil "mid godly" qualification? Because they don't have history in the first place (don't exist on past nor future).
Is it not that they only truly exist in the present?Eganergo said:I'm pretty sure having no past mean they leave no trace of past action as they only exist in the present.
I think that they mean mental destruction is too much, but soul isn't.Antoniofer said:Regenerating from its body and soul being destroyed is Mid-Godly, but if the mind/sanity do not "survive" the process I would say that is a weakness.
Definately, even though people consider me an opponent for TES, it definately has pretty god tier High-Godly regen.AogiriKira said:I think The Elder Scrolls is pretty clearly High-Godly
The reason they have True-Godly is because certain characters can survive being erased by CHIM, which just completely voids you from the dream of the godhead, which would count as across all aspects.
Yeah, and on top of that, they are able to erase beings from Non-Existence, such as erasing Sha, who is literally non-existence personified.AogiriKira said:Okay yeah Vecna and the Other DND gods definitely sound like they need to jump from Mid to High-Godly lmao
Their Regenerationn description quite literally states they can come back from all aspects of themselves being erased.
I wouldn't say CHIM is Zero-Sum.Antoniofer said:Isn't that Zero-Sum? CHIM is the opposite of that, but I only known that by general culture.