- 3,898
- 540
Honestly 5-B Grevious would be a fairer match
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah sure, as if you didn't write like 200 messages defending Grievous in a previous Armstrong vs Grievous thread, who the hell do you think you're fooling here? Come on, have some decencyWhich character is that? I dont have particular knowledge on either of these characters I just know there was an issue with raiden that was left unresolved
As I said, all he has is a fairly hefty AP lead which gets nulled in a few minutes, other than that, Raiden kills him with one sword-stroke, blitzes him with Blade Mode and negs the LightsaberDoes greevous have win cons, or this is a stomp?
so, since this isn't a stomp I'll just say Raiden FTW.As I said, all he has is a fairly hefty AP lead which gets nulled in a few minutes, other than that, Raiden kills him with one sword-stroke, blitzes him with Blade Mode and negs the Lightsaber
He's not losing anything. Look at the CRT, at least.Seeing as Raiden is losing his reactive power level now...
he's not, at most it's getting renamedSeeing as Raiden is losing his reactive power level now...
I did, it's getting changed to accelerated development which is vastly different from rpl, I've been following the thread since it was madeHe's not losing anything. Look at the CRT, at least.
Doesn't change the fact that he went from being stomped to stomping. Same shit.I did, it's getting changed to accelerated development which is vastly different from rpl, I've been following the thread since it was made
Except the reasoning makes it that he doesnt have any form of ap ampingDoesn't change the fact that he went from being stomped to stomping. Same shit.
it's literally the same exact thing tho, it's just a difference in how we call it, if anything, AD is better than RPL because RPL only works on stronger opponents and during fights, while AD works passively; it being called AD instead of RPL doesn't change the fact that he goes from getting no sold to squashing someone in like 1 minuteI did, it's getting changed to accelerated development which is vastly different from rpl, I've been following the thread since it was made
I can fix thatit's literally the same exact thing tho, it's just a difference in how we call it, if anything, AD is better than RPL because RPL only works on stronger opponents and during fights, while AD works passively; it being called AD instead of RPL doesn't change the fact that he goes from getting no sold to squashing someone in like 1 minute
... no, the fact that Raiden's AP grows is undisputed and undisputableExcept the reasoning makes it that he doesnt have any form of ap amping
Its heavily disputed actually, there is ample evidence to prove he doesnt have it... no, the fact that Raiden's AP grows is undisputed and undisputable
Just didexcept no, because nobody answered any of my points and I completely debunked the op, so no, you are straight up wrong, bring up some valid points on the thread and then we'll talk
Now that you remind me of him beating a Monsoon body in base after needing Ripper Mode previously, I'm in support of just renaming it to Accelerated Developmenthe's not, at most it's getting renamed
It's over by a long shot, and was removed mid-debate, unfortunatelyNow that you remind me of him beating a Monsoon body in base after needing Ripper Mode previously, I'm in support of just renaming it to Accelerated Development