• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Possible Anos and Venuzdonoa's 2-A range upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
I still have a question.... What to give him... A solid 2-A or 2-B likely/possibly 2-A rating.
 
I still have a question.... What to give him... A solid 2-A or 2-B likely/possibly 2-A rating.
Possibly 2-A rating.

You literally cannot give him a solid rating, since the entire justification for the rating in the first place is based on a semi-contradicted presumed WoG.
Once LN Volume 11 is released, and we hopefully get a better explanation of the Silver Sea, his rating could probably be changed to a solid rating if it is still accurate at that time.
 
Possibly 2-A rating.

You literally cannot give him a solid rating, since the entire justification for the rating in the first place is based on a semi-contradicted presumed WoG.
It is not contradicted, the size of the bubbles doesnt matter to the layers, but possibly should work
 
It is not contradicted, the size of the bubbles doesn't matter to the layers, but possibly should work
If the presumed author explanation contradicted the WN regarding the size of a bubble, then how do we know his statement about each layer being infinite in size is not also inaccurate?

Until someone provides a statement from the WN or LN itself that also states each layer is infinite in size, any ratings related to the size of a layer should be "possibly X", or "likely X" if there's a bit more evidence to support it.
 
If the presumed author explanation contradicted the WN regarding the size of a bubble, then how do we know his statement about each layer being infinite in size is not also inaccurate?
Because literally there is nothing contradicting the size of the layer, it never was stated otherwise, so, unless there is a contradiction about the layer size, its burden of proof to say that the layer size is inaccurate, since, there is No contradction
 
Because literally there is nothing contradicting the size of the layer, it never was stated otherwise, so, unless there is a contradiction about the layer size, its burden of proof to say that the layer size is inaccurate, since, there is No contradiction
That's just not how it works. You honestly cannot ignore the fact that one part of the presumed WoG contradicts the WN, and the other part is not confirmed at all in the novel.
The burden of proof is on the people claiming each layer is infinite in size, as the only evidence of that is from a presumed WoG that partially contradicts the WN.

I'm fine with a "possibly X" rating, but a solid rating based on this semi-contradicted presumed WoG is not possible.
 
That's just not how it works. You honestly cannot ignore the fact that one part of the presumed WoG contradicts the WN, and the other part is not confirmed at all in the novel.
The burden of proof is on the people claiming each layer is infinite in size, as the only evidence of that is from a presumed WoG that partially contradicts the WN.
This is wrong, it doesnt partially contradicts, it would contradict if he mentioned that the layer was size X but the novel states that the layer is size Y, however, there is no contradiction after all, only bubble size, which doesnt matter
 
I was hoping for a likely more than possibly, but possibly is more than enough then. So 2-B, possibly 2-A
 
Last edited:
it would contradict if he mentioned that the layer was size X but the novel states that the layer is size Y, however, there is no contradiction after all
It is also not confirmed in both the WN and LN, so there's no evidence to support this.

only bubble size, which doesn't matter
So you admit that the explanation partially contradicts the WN.
That should cause doubts about the legitimacy of the entire presumed WoG, which is why any solid rating based on this semi-contradicted presumed WoG is not possible.
 
I just wake up,now can we add possibly 2-A or still need more inputs?
We have Ultima's (2-A Ap and range), Elizhaa (2-A range, although she don't seem to have read the rest of the thread about 2-A Ap) and many other members agreed
 
It is also not confirmed in both the WN and LN, so there's no evidence to support this.


So you admit that the explanation partially contradicts the WN.
That should cause doubts about the legitimacy of the entire presumed WoG, which is why any solid rating based on this semi-contradicted presumed WoG is not possible.
1-No contradiction, so, we have WoG and no contradiction

2-I said that while it contradict bubble size, it nowhere contradicts the layer size
 
Exactly, but if you guys continue this discussion here you may cause more confusion, so go and discuss this on Pm or in the verse thread.
 
I don't know, maybe ask any staff to unlock Anos' profile to apply the changes, or as usual wait for Ant to unlock it and then have @Delta333 to apply the changes since he was the one who suggested them.
 
just imo... although I think a Solid 2-A is fine, it would be better to play it safe with a likely/possibly
 
The Venuzdonoa page needs to be updated as well. So does Sasha's page because she also used venuzdonoa.
 
those edits were poorly done, I tried to fix them from the first try but couldn't because someone keep editing the page, I fixed what was left and linked the thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top