- 16,386
- 10,817
I agree with what Shizuka accepted
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Possible Anos and Venuzdonoa's 2-A range upgrade
- Thread starter Delta333
- Start date
- Status
azontr
Any/All- 40,728
- 50,289
Shizuka says it's fine so that means it's fine.
- 15,441
- 7,154
Solid
- 873
- 661
Possibly 2-A rating.
You literally cannot give him a solid rating, since the entire justification for the rating in the first place is based on a semi-contradicted presumed WoG.
Once LN Volume 11 is released, and we hopefully get a better explanation of the Silver Sea, his rating could probably be changed to a solid rating if it is still accurate at that time.
- 16,386
- 10,817
It is not contradicted, the size of the bubbles doesnt matter to the layers, but possibly should work
- 873
- 661
If the presumed author explanation contradicted the WN regarding the size of a bubble, then how do we know his statement about each layer being infinite in size is not also inaccurate?
Until someone provides a statement from the WN or LN itself that also states each layer is infinite in size, any ratings related to the size of a layer should be "possibly X", or "likely X" if there's a bit more evidence to support it.
- 16,386
- 10,817
Because literally there is nothing contradicting the size of the layer, it never was stated otherwise, so, unless there is a contradiction about the layer size, its burden of proof to say that the layer size is inaccurate, since, there is No contradction
- 873
- 661
That's just not how it works. You honestly cannot ignore the fact that one part of the presumed WoG contradicts the WN, and the other part is not confirmed at all in the novel.
The burden of proof is on the people claiming each layer is infinite in size, as the only evidence of that is from a presumed WoG that partially contradicts the WN.
I'm fine with a "possibly X" rating, but a solid rating based on this semi-contradicted presumed WoG is not possible.
- 16,386
- 10,817
This is wrong, it doesnt partially contradicts, it would contradict if he mentioned that the layer was size X but the novel states that the layer is size Y, however, there is no contradiction after all, only bubble size, which doesnt matter
- 16,386
- 10,817
So, unless u show layer size being contradicted, there is no relevant contradiction to 2-A
- 16,386
- 10,817
Likely or possibly should work
- 873
- 661
It is also not confirmed in both the WN and LN, so there's no evidence to support this.
So you admit that the explanation partially contradicts the WN.
That should cause doubts about the legitimacy of the entire presumed WoG, which is why any solid rating based on this semi-contradicted presumed WoG is not possible.
- 11,385
- 19,972
We have Ultima's (2-A Ap and range), Elizhaa (2-A range, although she don't seem to have read the rest of the thread about 2-A Ap) and many other members agreed
- 16,386
- 10,817
1-No contradiction, so, we have WoG and no contradiction
2-I said that while it contradict bubble size, it nowhere contradicts the layer size
- 11,385
- 19,972
Yo dudes, stop this, take that in the Verse thread, let's just finish this, all we want is this thread over and stop causing more confusion
- 16,386
- 10,817
I said that i am fine with it being likely/possibly rating
- 16,386
- 10,817
right right, what left to this then?
- 873
- 661
I think this might still need more staff input.
If this is accepted, then the following justification or something similar could probably be added to both Anos and Venuzdonoa's profiles in the AP section:
"..., possibly Multiverse level+ (Each layer of the Silver Sea possibly has infinite size, therefore each layer can theoretically contain an infinite number of universes)"
If this is accepted, then the following justification or something similar could probably be added to both Anos and Venuzdonoa's profiles in the AP section:
"..., possibly Multiverse level+ (Each layer of the Silver Sea possibly has infinite size, therefore each layer can theoretically contain an infinite number of universes)"
- 4,799
- 2,589
- Thread starter
- #267
Can we add it now?
- 16,006
- 8,253
Yes. Which pages need to be open?
- 11,385
- 19,972
just this i think
- 11,385
- 19,972
yeah, but those pages doesn't need to be unlocked
- 16,006
- 8,253
I unlocked the page.
- 11,385
- 19,972
hey noobie, is your turn
They have never been vandalized so it's okay.
- 873
- 661
I have applied the accepted changes to Venuzdonoa and Sasha Necron.
The accepted changes still need to be applied to Anos Voldigoad.
The accepted changes still need to be applied to Anos Voldigoad.
- 1,295
- 772
Range shouldn't be "possibly", it should be a clear cut 2A.
- 4,799
- 2,589
- Thread starter
- #279
It should be possibly due to being semi contradicted to canon,if you disagree talk to Null about it
- Status
Similar threads
