- 16,263
- 10,712
I agree with what Shizuka accepted
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shizuka says it's fine so that means it's fine.I'm fine with 2-A AP too, soo I agree with that.
SolidI still have a question.... What to give him... A solid 2-A or 2-B likely/possibly 2-A rating.
Possibly 2-A rating.I still have a question.... What to give him... A solid 2-A or 2-B likely/possibly 2-A rating.
It is not contradicted, the size of the bubbles doesnt matter to the layers, but possibly should workPossibly 2-A rating.
You literally cannot give him a solid rating, since the entire justification for the rating in the first place is based on a semi-contradicted presumed WoG.
If the presumed author explanation contradicted the WN regarding the size of a bubble, then how do we know his statement about each layer being infinite in size is not also inaccurate?It is not contradicted, the size of the bubbles doesn't matter to the layers, but possibly should work
Because literally there is nothing contradicting the size of the layer, it never was stated otherwise, so, unless there is a contradiction about the layer size, its burden of proof to say that the layer size is inaccurate, since, there is No contradctionIf the presumed author explanation contradicted the WN regarding the size of a bubble, then how do we know his statement about each layer being infinite in size is not also inaccurate?
That's just not how it works. You honestly cannot ignore the fact that one part of the presumed WoG contradicts the WN, and the other part is not confirmed at all in the novel.Because literally there is nothing contradicting the size of the layer, it never was stated otherwise, so, unless there is a contradiction about the layer size, its burden of proof to say that the layer size is inaccurate, since, there is No contradiction
This is wrong, it doesnt partially contradicts, it would contradict if he mentioned that the layer was size X but the novel states that the layer is size Y, however, there is no contradiction after all, only bubble size, which doesnt matterThat's just not how it works. You honestly cannot ignore the fact that one part of the presumed WoG contradicts the WN, and the other part is not confirmed at all in the novel.
The burden of proof is on the people claiming each layer is infinite in size, as the only evidence of that is from a presumed WoG that partially contradicts the WN.
Likely or possibly should workI was hoping for a likely, but possibly is more than enough. So 2-B, possibly 2-A
It is also not confirmed in both the WN and LN, so there's no evidence to support this.it would contradict if he mentioned that the layer was size X but the novel states that the layer is size Y, however, there is no contradiction after all
So you admit that the explanation partially contradicts the WN.only bubble size, which doesn't matter
We have Ultima's (2-A Ap and range), Elizhaa (2-A range, although she don't seem to have read the rest of the thread about 2-A Ap) and many other members agreedI just wake up,now can we add possibly 2-A or still need more inputs?
1-No contradiction, so, we have WoG and no contradictionIt is also not confirmed in both the WN and LN, so there's no evidence to support this.
So you admit that the explanation partially contradicts the WN.
That should cause doubts about the legitimacy of the entire presumed WoG, which is why any solid rating based on this semi-contradicted presumed WoG is not possible.
Yo dudes, stop this, take that in the Verse thread, let's just finish this, all we want is this thread over and stop causing more confusion1-No contradiction, so, we have WoG and no contradiction
2-I said that while it contradict bubble size, it nowhere contradicts the layer size
I said that i am fine with it being likely/possibly ratingYo dudes, stop this, take that in the Verse thread, let's just finish this, all we want is this thread over and stop causing more confusion
Can we add it now?I could be fine with a solid 2-A, from Ultima's reasonings.
Yes. Which pages need to be open?Can we add it now?
just this i thinkYes. Which pages need to be open?
yeah, but those pages doesn't need to be unlockedThe Venuzdonoa page needs to be updated as well. So does Sasha's page because she also used venuzdonoa.
I unlocked the page.just this i think
I unlocked the page.
hey noobie, is your turnCan we add it now?
They have never been vandalized so it's okay.Didn't know that lol. Why the hell aren't they locked-
Range shouldn't be "possibly", it should be a clear cut 2A.done
It should be possibly due to being semi contradicted to canon,if you disagree talk to Null about itRange shouldn't be "possibly", it should be a clear cut 2A.