- 10,285
- 2,761
Out of curiosity, in the Persona series, has the word “World” ever been used to describe something smaller than a universe?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
According to Solacis: "There hasn't been a single time, in all of my rewatches and replays of the games (admittedly only as far as I can remember), that the aforementioned words have been used to refer to something as limited as, say, the planet."Out of curiosity, in the Persona series, has the word “World” ever been used to describe something smaller than a universe?
So... “World” means nothing then? When they use the word “World”, they referred to the visible space that the player sees? If I’m understanding that correctly.According to those in disagreement, it is considered "Linguistic Powerscaling".
So... “World” means nothing then? When they use the word “World”, they referred to the visible space that the player sees? If I’m understanding that correctly.
It's not just a mimicry, basically, the cognitive world is a replica of the real world, and the only thing that changes are the areas were the distortion of the palace rulers reaches, for example, there is an exact copy of the real world in Kamoshida's cognition, but the school as a whole is completely different from the real world, that's because in Kamoshida's eyes the school looks/is like a castle from his perception. What is being questioned is the size of the space inside of the cognitive world, whether is infinite or finite.:/ I mean, fair, but from what I understand about cognition that the game told, it’s basically the mimicry of what an individual understands how the reality they live in works.
Basically, I understand that I live in the universe. That I live in a neighborhood. The cognition would re-create the neighborhood exactly because I’m aware of it, even mimic the details I would never know of about the neighborhood.
I don't mind hearing it now. Considering the time difference, this is pretty much the last free day I have before I'm off for service for another week.Well, I have a response ready for Sol's comment, not for Milly's yet. Should I post this and just continue with the debate or wait until tomorrow when I have more time/energy to dedicate to this thread?
If you're not going to be constructive, please leave.Dargoo still solos
It is used metaphorically to refer to people's experiences too. Like, world is a pretty common word that people throw around and it has lots of meanings depending on the context.Out of curiosity, in the Persona series, has the word “World” ever been used to describe something smaller than a universe?
Where has that been said in the Persona verse though?It is used metaphorically to refer to people's experiences too. Like, world is a pretty common word that people throw around and it has lots of meanings depending on the context.
Someone saying "you changed my world with your kindness" has an obviously different context than "They are polluting the world's oceans".
Where has that been said in the Persona verse though?
Also did Dargoo play Persona?
I've already made an example using a noun further up on the thread. I feel like this is just being nitpicky and attacking something irrelevant to the case I was making rather than, well, attacking the case itself. The principle is ultimately the same - you're taking one use of a word and trying to apply it to all other uses of the word.This cannot be assumed. Besides the fact that the words "world" and "yellow" are a noun and adjective respectively, and thus aren't comparable through your example outside of the former being used purely metaphorically, what if the writers did in fact have such a thing?
You're treating this like a powerscaling problem and not a linguistic problem. Words that have multiple meanings being used a certain way does not, and I'll say this for the final time, mean that it must always be used a certain way in a verse. A palace can be a "world", the universe can be a "world", that does not mean a palace must be the universe or be universe-like, because that's not how the word works. Reality is even worse in this regard.I have already presented several scans of the words "world" and "reality" being used in reference to the universe, and no scans so far have contradicted this conclusion. In terms of evidence, said conclusion should already be valid, as I've noted above.
Mementos being universal in size despite only having visible distortions underground would give credence to the assertion that all Palaces, regardless of the size of distortion, would be universal in size as well.
This is like saying that, since a pocket reality is made of matter/space/energy and the universe is made of matter/space/energy, all pocket realities must be the size of the universe. How a pocket reality is composed and created does not indicate it has a specific size.[/quote]At this point, there is no reason to believe that any Palace would be arbitrarily smaller in scale considering all of them clearly refer to the same 'template' in the collective unconscious.
That was quite literally the question being asked to Matt. Has world been used to describe things like that in Persona?Why does it need to be said in Persona? Persona doesn't determine what words mean. If Persona doesn't use a word a certain way once it doesn't mean that potential use of the word stops existing.
I've played Persona 5 and watched the anime. Good stuff, although this isn't very relevant to the thread.
I get that, but I was asking why the question is relevant to the discussion here to begin with.That was quite literally the question being asked to Matt. Has world been used to describe things like that in Persona?
I also agree with him. Wtf is this reasoning for low 2-C fodder in P5 lolI agree with all of Matthew's arguments. Individual palaces doesn't seem universal sized based on the evidence provided.
just because they’re fodder doesn’t mean they aren’t allowed to have a high tier and also they’re bosses not fodder.I also agree with him. Wtf is this reasoning for low 2-C fodder in P5 lol
darg isnt the problem since he actually makes sense if viewed from a certain point but ngl I dont agree with his points. The real problem imo is Matt no offense but he doesn't really justify any of his points and just sides with the group trying to turn down the crtsAt this point, I think just seeing what side of the argument for Low 2-C Palaces have the most support and conclude it based on that. We'll hit 500 replies by Tuesday and not make any progress(unless Darg wants to concede).
Yeah, I don’t think Darg is a problem either, but if he were to come to concession on this then we’d basically be done with the debate about Low 2-C Palaces.darg isnt the problem since he actually makes sense if viewed from a certain point but ngl I dont agree with his points. The real problem imo is Matt no offense but he doesn't really justify any of his points and just sides with the group trying to turn down the crts
Because the other feats beyond "has a palace" are nowhere near Low 2-C like OP insists.just because they’re fodder doesn’t mean they aren’t allowed to have a high tier and also they’re bosses not fodder.
I don't understand the logic here.Yeah, I don’t think Darg is a problem either, but if he were to come to concession on this then we’d basically be done with the debate about Low 2-C Palaces.
I don't see what was wrong with what I said. We were talking about how this debate has been dragging on, and none of us has budged. I said that it'd be best if we just see which side has more support and then go with that. Unless Darg comes to a concession with Sol's recent response.I don't understand the logic here.
"If he just agreed we wouldn't have a discussion". I mean, yeah? This is why discussions even exist in the first place.
Wasn't actually aware of this, personally. Just from what I could research on a surface level, a variety of sources told me that the Japanese word "Sekai" basically has the same definitions and uses as the English word "world", and I found that very easy to believe considering the western influence on modern Japan - and wouldn't be surprised that the last century has influenced the word's meaning to include a variety of uses that are beyond "the planet", "society", and "the universe". For now I'll take your word on this while I do some more research myself - and I'll look for examples in Persona where it was used in a context that would match the English definition. However in my experience, at least in fiction, "world" even in the Japanese definition doesn't have a set size for which it describes thing.However, in Japanese it has far more limited meanings, with more nuanced uses of the word requiring additional characters beyond just the standard "世界", and would be reflected in the localization as being more than just "world" on its own.
I mean, I dont see why not. But I am not fluent, so dont take my word as law.
it's a contextual word
so yes
it doesn't have necessary to be the planet
or the universe
RWBY and Steven Universe have seen worse, from my experience at least.Oh Jesus, I just noticed this is part 1 of the revision, and we are still in the first argument. Have something like this ever happened in Vsbattle?.