I'm not talking about seconds, but that, in the time that the drop crossed the distance that you calculated, DSK crossed that distance that I calculated, so there's no need to use the distance found in the manga.
Yes, not counting the timeframe. We have no idea what kind of slowdown the raindrops are in the manga. Therefore, we take anime.
Unclear. None of the calk members said their opinions on Garou's feat separately (the feat itself is controversial, in theory it can be ignored). We are still thinking (we two) about the feat of the Sea King. At first, there was controversy over the Sea King's movements while Sonic dodged in the anime. Then there was the controversy about the speed of the Sea King in the anime (that they are too slow).
@Executor_N0 @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @Mr._Bambu @Therefir @Ugarik @DMUA @Damage3245 @DemonGodMitchAubin @Jasonsith @Wokistan @Armorchompy @KieranH10 @Migue79
Obviously, nobody even cared about it, you and I are the only ones.
We need to know whether we should use new versions for some One-Punch Man calculations or not.
This calculation has many ends. Which one do you prefer?
Okay, thank you. As I saw, you asked about the context of the achievement. The link to the whole feat is included in the calculation. First, the fact is that Garou's claim that the spear "barely moves" in his eyes is rather vague. I don't mean Garou is lying. I mean, in his eyes, this spear could have a speed of 5 centimeters per second, or 4, or 6. Still, if the bullet in your eyes moves at a speed of 5 centimeters per second, then for you it will be like "barely moving". Secondly, did the stream of water have time to accelerate the spear to its own? The spear was accelerated by water about 6-8 meters, no more. That is, the jet accelerated the spear for about 0.01 seconds. I do not know how to calculate this, but I doubt that the spear had time to accelerate to the same speed as the jet.
Well, good. Garow will be the MHS. That's cool. Many thanks.
"Strongest discussion". Most said they agreed with 20 slabs. One person trolled, but still agreed. It no longer makes sense, because the calculation is accepted.
I have already warned that I am going to create a discussion later on the topic of Flash speed through a new method. By the way, why not take 1 centimeter for stones for now? It will be Sub-Relativistic+, still not bad.
Weren't there like only 2 in total excluding the troll? I don't recall anyone even focusing on your post as they were more concern about the troll
In the calculation of Flash, a method was used in which the ninja ran 2.3 kilometers, until the stones that flew up at a speed of 22 meters per second did not have time to move even 0.1 centimeter. We found out that using 0.001 meters is a jerk. We have no proof that the stones moved only a millimeter. Now we understand that it is better to use 1 centimeter or more, depending on the case, as with the Sea King. But I don't know why he wants to completely ignore the feat and scale his speed through Tatsumaki, because using 1 centimeter will make Flash Sub-Relativistic+, which is also cool.
Yes. But that's still enough. Plus, whoever trolled also agreed about 20 slabs. His trolling was related to another.
We will also not use 1 cm, it is a very high ball and we cannot prove that it simply moved like that along the way.
Here is another case. Flash creates more than 20 explosions, where the very first and last explosion visually do not have a difference in size. This may indicate that while Flash is covering this distance (2.3 kilometers), the very first explosion did not have time to spread fast enough for the last (more than 20) explosion to have differences in size with it. This suggests that the explosions are static for Flash. According to the rules of this wiki, static is the speed of a snail, which means we take 1 centimeter per second.
Most probably not
I think that we need at least a few calc group members to accept the new calculations over the old ones in order to apply this revision.
