- 2,795
- 1,697
That's true for type 1, but did you read what type 2 nonexistent physiology means, in the "Nature of Nothingness" part? Based on all the information about Nonexisty, I think type 2 is more accurate, in which case the evidence is that size doesn't apply to him rather than being that he can change his size. Maybe type 3 could work instead, but I'm sure that type 1 is too little nonexistence to accurately represent Nonexisty.A nothing is the lack of material, It's size is based on whatsurronds It, the nothing will always be as big as the space It's confined in, in other words, he still should have size manipulation based on his size be based on what is surronding him at the moment