New Multiverse Names

[Lightbuster30]

See here's the thing: The + sign is always used to denote being stupidly far into your tier, usually being at least halfway between yours and the next. But the problem comes from some things I've seen: Thanks to using + as an actual tier, makes it more difficult to tell who is far into baseline 2-A, and who isn't. Not to mention that, as far as I'm aware. 2-A is the only tier to incorporate the + sign to separate it's name from the other tiers. It makes it look out of place.

I suggest we rename 2-A from Multiversal+ to High Multiversal, to allow the + sign to be used for really high end characters. As for the current High Multiversal? Simply incorporate it into the base for Low 1-C. Low 1-C is used for higher dimensionality, and how is 5D not going outside that? Not to mention it just looks better for the 4D tier in my opinion.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Maybe 9D should be 1-C+?

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

I don't see what the problem with Multiverse level+

 

[ALRF]

I don't see what the problem with Multiverse level+

Same

 

[Lightbuster30]

It's literally the only tier to use that. We have "High" and "Low" tiers. It just feels out of place. But the big reason is mostly because it makes it more difficult to tell who is higher into the tier, due to the nature of the + on this wiki.

 

[The_Everlasting]

A tier's name is a name.

As long as the tier is clearly defined the name shouldn't matter.

 

[Ultima_Reality]

Explanations inside parentheses exist to tell how high one is at 2-A

This is a stupidly minor change that would take a lot of unnecessary work

 

[AstralKing7]

im still confused with Multi Universal equaling low multiverseal. Thats so confusing man why couldnt we just keep Multi Universal

 

[Antvasima]

Multi-Universe is another word for Multiverse. It sounded stupid.

 

[Antvasima]

Anyway, I agree with the other staff members.