Naruto's speed

[M11UTD]

So I saw the relativistic calc for Toneri's meteors and I have a question, what's makes you so sure that Toneri shot the meteors the moment he finished his conversation with Naruto? .. because the meteors were too small to be visible from moon to earth and he could've shot it before he started talking with Naruto. If you pay attention, the meteor is already shining when Toneri projection disappeared meaning it was sent before the projection happened, unless it was a recorded projection (which seems unlikely, this ain't Star Wars lol), it was likely even before the projection itself appeared before Naruto, also Hinata walked at literally normal speeds as the meteor was moving, so unless we're gonna say that the meteor suddenly super massively slowed down or that Hinata walks at sub-rel speeds, then yeah I don't think the meteor was going that fast.

 

[Antvasima]

You can ask Kepekley23 to comment here if you wish.

 

[Danny1112]

I too have problem with this,there is no indication or statement of whatsoever claiming that it was toneri who moved the meteor.

 

[Kepekley23]

We have already had 2 large threads about this where it was decided the feat was legit, that I am not eager to revive:

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1640646

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1652066

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thanks. We can probably close this thread then.

Should we add a discussion rule for this?

 

[Kepekley23]

Well, discussion rules are getting revised, aren't they?

Maybe mention it on Assalt's blog, yea.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, Assalt is taking a break from the revision at the moment, so I think that you can add a rule, and then mention it to him.

 

[M11UTD]

did anyone in these threads mentioned the stuff that I said here? I don't have time to check them now so maybe later but if not then I need answers.

 

[Kepekley23]

@M11

They did, specifically The real cal howard. Check them.

 

[AstralKing7]

Will the discussion rule for Naruto specifically be added to the verse page for new visitors

 

[KLOL506]

I guess so.

 

[Antvasima]

I think that we were talking about adding such rules to the verse pages as well, but since those are easily edited by anybody, it seemed like a bad idea.

Assaltwaffle is going to restructure our Discussion Rules page though.

 

[AstralKing7]

Oh okay I see now

 

[Sigurd_Snake_in_The_Eye]

OP has a valid question, don't think people should be forced to read 2 threads for an answer.

Why not just answer his question?

And link this thread if you plan to make a rule.

 

[AstralKing7]

Um no one is being forced. The threads are linked at the top. Also the rule was already made like Kep said.

 

[KLOL506]

Kep just gave the links and the evidences. What more can you want, Sig?

 

[Antvasima]

@Kepekley23

Let's return to the issue of writing a discussion rule. Are you willing to do so?

 

[The_real_cal_howard]

I did ask those questions in those threads...