• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
or you could like research it again just to be absolutely sure
I am an engineering graduate my guy. I can calculate it myself. If you don't trust me that's fine, just read Arc's blog carefully. The angular velocity has the unit rad/s. Which means the energy calculated was per second. Did you really think he took the amount of energy created in an entire year and slapped it on the profiles as AP?
 
I am an engineering graduate my guy. I can calculate it myself. If you don't trust me, then read Arc's blog carefully. The angular velocity has the unit rad/s. Which means the energy calculated was per second. Did you really think he took the amount of energy created in an entire year and slapped it on the profiles as AP?
Did he not convert the amount of days in a year cycle to seconds and use it in the calc? no need to mention your degree. It doesn't help the argument even though i might be wrong
 
I am an engineering graduate my guy. I can calculate it myself. If you don't trust me that's fine, just read Arc's blog carefully. The angular velocity has the unit rad/s. Which means the energy calculated was per second. Did you really think he took the amount of energy created in an entire year and slapped it on the profiles as AP?
actually you are probably right on second thought
 
Did he not convert the amount of days in a year cycle to seconds and use it in the calc?
Do you understand how KE is calculated and what speed is? Speed isn't the total distance covered. It is the amount of distance covered in unit time. The unit being seconds. The calc uses angular velocity. Which means the angle that Earth orbits in one second. This means if you use rad/s, the only energy you will calculate is per second. So if KE is 0.5*m*v^2, and v is in m/s, then the energy is calculated per second. Hopefully that makes it clear.
actually you are probably right on second thought
Np. I didn't mention my degree to be condescending. I mentioned because I know what I am talking about prolly and if you are unsure then I can tell you how it's calculated.
 
Do you understand how KE is calculated and what speed is? Speed isn't the total distance covered. It is the amount of distance covered in unit time. The unit being seconds. The calc uses angular velocity. Which means the angle that Earth orbits in one second. This means if you use rad/s, the only energy you will calculate is per second. So if KE is 0.5*m*v^2, and v is in m/s, then the energy is calculated per second. Hopefully that makes it clear.

Np. I didn't mention my degree to be condescending. I mentioned because I know what I am talking about prolly and if you are unsure then I can tell you how it's calculated.
I understand what you are saying and how to calc it. I just wanted to be sure.
I'm still telling you that mentioning your degree wasn't necessary. All of us can't do that. If you simply explain anyone would get it
 
I understand what you are saying and how to calc it. I just wanted to be sure.
I'm still telling you that mentioning your degree wasn't necessary. All of us can't do that. If you simply explain anyone would get it
I think mentioning his degree was warranted in this case since it was in reference to an implication of not knowing what he's talking about. It'd be like telling a lawyer that you know the law and they should brush up.
 
I think mentioning his degree was warranted in this case since it was in reference to an implication of not knowing what he's talking about. It'd be like telling a lawyer that you know the law and they should brush up.
Credibility is the whole point of a degree.

People ain't typically getting them for kicks.
I never implied that. All I wanted to know is if he was absolutely sure. I'm also a final student majoring in engineering, I could have replied such but I see no point unless if someone is directly challenging my competence which I did not do. It just felt like the convo went from zero to hundred so quickly, I mean anyone can forget stuff. But no need to dwell on tat.
 
Nobody is dwelling on the fact that you forgot stuff. It's about you trying to push the burden of research on me when it should have been you who did that either when you first pointed out a "flaw" in my hypothesis, or after I first told you to read up on angular velocity. Why would I do research on something so obviously true? Imagine I told you to do research on how to do multiplication or trigonometry. Nobody says this unless they are absolutely sure in their own logic. If you are the one who isn't sure then you have to do the research. I didn't know this needed to be said.
 
Reading the responses:
04-antonio-banderas-interview-gq-september-2019-093019.gif
 
Karo: You're wrong.
Me: No you. Read about angular velocity. (indicating I am sure about what I am saying)
Karo: Do your research. (still not looking up the calc or any formula)
Me: I have because I have a job that requires me to know this stuff as basics. (evidence for my research)
Karo: There is no need to say that.
 
Energy per second is power. All I calculated was energy, not power. HelloThere is right in the sense that it doesn't take a year for Earth to "produce" that energy. Cuz it isn't producing anything at all, that's just the energy associated with its motion due to the force from the Sun acting on Earth. Earth always has that KE (on average), but it's not a thing of it yields this amount of KE per second. Applying a per timeframe to the calc at all is just wrong, since at that point you're dealing with power, which is just different than what I calc'd.
 
Energy per second is power. All I calculated was energy, not power. HelloThere is right in the sense that it doesn't take a year for Earth to "produce" that energy. Cuz it isn't producing anything at all, that's just the energy associated with its motion due to the force from the Sun acting on Earth. Earth always has that KE (on average), but it's not a thing of it yields this amount of KE per second. Applying a per timeframe to the calc at all is just wrong, since at that point you're dealing with power, which is just different than what I calc'd.
Ouu busted
 
Energy per second is power. All I calculated was energy, not power. HelloThere is right in the sense that it doesn't take a year for Earth to "produce" that energy. Cuz it isn't producing anything at all, that's just the energy associated with its motion due to the force from the Sun acting on Earth. Earth always has that KE (on average), but it's not a thing of it yields this amount of KE per second. Applying a per timeframe to the calc at all is just wrong, since at that point you're dealing with power, which is just different than what I calc'd.
This is true. I should have worded it better:

What I meant to say is that the KE due to the Earth's motion is calculated based on the angular velocity or orbital velocity which in SI units is per second. If it were per year, the result would become massive and not really be in terms of Joules, which is not the case. Of course Earth doesn't just keep stacking up energy overtime.
 
Last edited:
Energy per second is power. All I calculated was energy, not power. HelloThere is right in the sense that it doesn't take a year for Earth to "produce" that energy. Cuz it isn't producing anything at all, that's just the energy associated with its motion due to the force from the Sun acting on Earth. Earth always has that KE (on average), but it's not a thing of it yields this amount of KE per second. Applying a per timeframe to the calc at all is just wrong, since at that point you're dealing with power, which is just different than what I calc'd.
Btw, is this regarding my proposal also? Because I want to know your thoughts on that. Even if Boruto absorbs some of the KE contained in Earth, it has to be constantly refilled or else the planet would go off course right? So it would make sense that more charging time = more energy absorbed from a limitless source. Which is basically the crux of my proposal.
 
you know those annoying shippers in other fandoms that swear these two straight characters are obviously gay for one another and then use the most vanilla ass interactions to justify it.
I'm ngl, those are not the annoying shippers, we have people saying Kakashi was into Sakura.
 
Btw, is this regarding my proposal also? Because I want to know your thoughts on that. Even if Boruto absorbs some of the KE contained in Earth, it has to be constantly refilled or else the planet would go off course right? So it would make sense that more charging time = more energy absorbed from a limitless source. Which is basically the crux of my proposal.
What proposal
 
What are everyone's thoughts on the fact that Hidari used an external tree to regen even though the Shinju are supposed to be similar to Biju. Jura has previously commented on Biju regen and how good it is compared to Jinjuriki regen.
 
Kaguya: gets badly wounded by Naruto...
Had to forcibly transform into the Ten Tails and absorb Shinobi Chakra to regen...

Hidari: gets badly wounded by Boruto...
Had to absorb extra tree biomass and or Chakra to regen...

Might be similar
 
What are everyone's thoughts on the fact that Hidari used an external tree to regen even though the Shinju are supposed to be similar to Biju. Jura has previously commented on Biju regen and how good it is compared to Jinjuriki regen.
i was confused, did he regen from sarada's chidori earlier on.
 
Kaguya: gets badly wounded by Naruto...
Had to forcibly transform into the Ten Tails and absorb Shinobi Chakra to regen...

Hidari: gets badly wounded by Boruto...
Had to absorb extra tree biomass and or Chakra to regen...

Might be similar
But this confused me a lot. Here are the facts:

1. Himawari has shown one of the best and quickest regen in the show being faster than a Jinjuriki regen.
2. Jura said her regen is almost like a Bijus regen, implying Biju>Jinjuriki in terms of regen.
3. Jura called himself a Biju and Kurama called Jura a ten tails.
4. Hidari used an external healing source to regen implying he can't even independently regen his abdomen after a Chidori.
So which is it? Where does Biju regen come into play here?
i was confused, did he regen from sarada's chidori earlier on.
Yes but after going into the claw mark. Sarada even comments this chapter that Hidari is gonna regen again if he escapes into the claw mark.
 
But this confused me a lot. Here are the facts:

1. Himawari has shown one of the best
So far, a broken leg and abdomen and arm punctures

IIRC Jinchuriki Low Mid Regen comes from Naruto regenerating from a stab wound through the chest, so she'd scale above that

and quickest regen in the show being faster than a Jinjuriki regen.
Yeah

2. Jura said her regen is almost like a Bijus regen, implying Biju>Jinjuriki in terms of regen.

Maybe that's for like speed and efficiency, like how Tsunade's automatic regen is better compared to Kabuto's regen which requires his concentration in gathering chakra to where he'd be wounded

Maybe? I dunno...

4. Hidari used an external healing source to regen implying he can't even independently regen his abdomen.
So which is it? Where does Biju regen come into play here?
Shrugs
 
When Jura said Himawari had Healing Power far beyond Human Level, did he have knowledge about Kabuto, Orochimaru, and Tsunade? Or was that just based on the current information he had on regular humans/Shinobi?
 
So far, a broken leg and abdomen and arm punctures
Yes
IIRC Jinchuriki Low Mid Regen comes from Naruto regenerating from a stab wound through the chest, so she'd scale above that
Yes
Yes
Maybe that's for like speed and efficiency, like how Tsunade's automatic regen is better compared to Kabuto's regen which requires his concentration in gathering chakra to where he'd be wounded

Maybe? I dunno...
Yes
Yes
When Jura said Himawari had Healing Power far beyond Human Level, did he have knowledge about Kabuto, Orochimaru, and Tsunade? Or was that just based on the current information he had on regular humans/Shinobi?
Don't know. He read a bunch of books and seemed to know stuff about Konoha and tailed beasts. But idk if he did a deep dive on the history of shinobi regen. Bottom line is, we can't really call it Hidari's regen if he needs external help. A chidori to the abdomen shouldn't need specialized regen as far as we know. So it's really confusing on what's happening.
 
Might be Jura is hyping the Neo Shinju in terms of regen and stats, when it might be that he's the only one that's actually capable of doing those things.
Yeah could be. Or they consider that external tree as part of their own body because that tree is the remaining part of the ten tails body. So they are essentially healing themselves with extra steps.
 
Back
Top