Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lions fans praying on the TD + onside + Hail Mary TDboys I'm trying to watch Jayden Daniels put belt to ass.
no fighting
Lions fans praying on the TD + onside + Hail Mary TD
And I’m selling my Daniel’s jerseythey pull that off in a minute and change im buying a lions jersey
No?Notice how he conceded once someone other than me repeated what I said bro’s just player hating cuz he’s insecure let him be
This was unfiltered assFunny enough you do need a counter to debunk it lmao. It’s not vague it’s rather direct, many (3-4) doubles in strength (factors of 2), is lowballed to 3 doubles (which is 2^3 or 8x). So you’ve got a very clear 8-16x multiplier statement (we stay conservative on vsbw so we went 8x). And then Sarada is shown to be likely correct given they do make leaps in strength. Thus there’s preponderance for her goal (getting 8x stronger) being achieved. You need to provide refutation for the interpretation that she’s just waffling being more likely than the other. Which you just haven’t done and instead are just coping about it.
Again you’ve provided no refutation. All you said was “I think the argument is ass”. Like sit down and take your L like a manNo?
This was unfiltered ass
Saying we need to be x times stronger is WAY worse than saying “I consider myself to require getting x times stronger to beat y entity” and since test implied they later on matched said y entity I didn’t have issues with it
You were simply unconvincing and often times just sound outright desperate
Now personally I would suggest having Deepa have all the mental gymnastics explained in his profile justifications and then scale everyone normally to that as opposed to saying “HA 8X!!”
You didn’t prove anything buddy lmao you got folded and everyone but you agrees that your “counters” were assThere’s no L I was gonna call you out for FAILING to prove she did reach those levels until Test pointed out them later on matching him
Idk why you’re this obsessed over a multiplier for an arc you haven’t watched that affects characters you don’t care about, absurd
I just did prove it’s more likely than it isn’t. You didn’t refute a single thing I said. I won via burden of rejoinder 2 easyThis is bad comedy (notice how he didn’t respond to me talking about him failing to prove evidence for you know what?
Notice how he started meatriding for a multiplier he has no contextual clue on?)
U R
I N V A L I D
L I L
B R O
Which required proof she hit that to be more likely than notI just did prove it’s more likely than it isn’t. You didn’t refute a single thing I said. I won via burden of rejoinder 2 easy
Yes and I provided proof that you just didn’t refute. Stop talking sonWhich required proof she hit that to be more likely than not
The last line is just straight up laughable nerd behaviour
I did already. The main argument is that it is a simile and should not be used.I'll recommend going through this before making a Lariat thread
Based on the title, I'm sure some of you can tell that this will be a thread going over the validity of a "light speed" Raikage statement given to us by a Databook.
This was previously gone over in a separate thread back in 2021 where it was declined for a couple of reasons I want to touch on today.
As far as I can tell from this thread listed above the main reasons for the statement having been declined were differing opinions on interpretations, another conflicting Naruto Speed CRT going on at...
- Godernet
- a (fourth raikage) naruto (verse)
- Replies: 195
- Forum: Content Revision
Why my past getting exposed like thisI'll recommend going through this before making a Lariat thread
Based on the title, I'm sure some of you can tell that this will be a thread going over the validity of a "light speed" Raikage statement given to us by a Databook.
This was previously gone over in a separate thread back in 2021 where it was declined for a couple of reasons I want to touch on today.
As far as I can tell from this thread listed above the main reasons for the statement having been declined were differing opinions on interpretations, another conflicting Naruto Speed CRT going on at...
- Godernet
- a (fourth raikage) naruto (verse)
- Replies: 195
- Forum: Content Revision
I want people to engage it here first.Well if you read the debunk threads and you’re confident you can refute them, I’d say go forth with the thread. I don’t think there’s better prep you can do
I can tell you for a matter of fact, that Deceived, the guy who made the Kirin debunk, isn’t engaging it here lol. But if you’re cool with that, then yeah go your own paceI want people to engage it here first.
The Kirin one is heavily agreed upon by majority of the fans to be valid, I don't need to touch much on it here. I'm currently discussing the double lariat because no one pays attention to it anymore. Meanwhile I think it is a good supporting evidence for Light-speed Raikage.I can tell you for a matter of fact, that Deceived, the guy who made the Kirin debunk, isn’t engaging it here lol. But if you’re cool with that, then yeah go your own pace
The deadliest expressions don't always mean stronger. There was an expression for Edo Deidara that said he was one of the deadliest characters. There's a similar expression for Kakuzu. It's a bit more ruthless and something said in reference to hax.I remember a Kurenai vs Anko discussion a few months back, and wasn't Anko called the deadliest Kunoichi in Databook 1?
How did you arrive at this?Light Speed = Jonin Minato~V2 Ay>>V1 Ay's Lariat
I’d wait to see if Damage’s thread goes through or not. IMO whether or not it gets accepted as literal vs hyperbolic depends on the surrounding context. Aka are there supportive light speed scaling etc etc. So, if Damage’s thread goes through, I think you’d have a much harder time building that consistency.The Kirin one is heavily agreed upon by majority of the fans to be valid, I don't need to touch much on it here. I'm currently discussing the double lariat because no one pays attention to it anymore. Meanwhile I think it is a good supporting evidence for Light-speed Raikage.
Which part/sHow did you arrive at this?
Light speed ~ Jonin MinatoWhich part/s
I pray the bottom of my heart that it doesn't.I’d wait to see if Damage’s thread goes through or not. IMO whether or not it gets accepted as literal vs hyperbolic depends on the surrounding context. Aka are there supportive light speed scaling etc etc. So, if Damage’s thread goes through, I think you’d have a much harder time building that consistency.
Light speed ~ Jonin Minato
Why do you think Jonin Minato is Relative to Adult V2 Ay?
Nothing burger childish responsesYes and I provided proof that you just didn’t refute. Stop talking son
I half want to make a LS thread compiling all the statements and attempt to upgrade a good portion of the verse, but I half don't because I lack confidence in its success...
You've read the full chapter?Glad to see it wasn't a Shikamaru antifeat. It was just usual Konohamaru behavior.
Majority of fans do agree but at the end of the day your arguments need to be convincing to staffs, same staffs who agreed to the downgrade. If you arguments are convincing enough we're behind you.The Kirin one is heavily agreed upon by majority of the fans to be valid, I don't need to touch much on it here. I'm currently discussing the double lariat because no one pays attention to it anymore. Meanwhile I think it is a good supporting evidence for Light-speed Raikage.
Why do you think Jonin Minato is Relative to Adult V2 Ay?
a true Minato fan wouldn’t settle for anything less than ftl combat for the flash of the hidden leaf
MayhapsDon’t worry about what is acceptable by the wiki just go for what you feel deep down is truth, that mentality closes off a lot of upgrades in the wiki that wouldn’t be opposed had you done them off wiki due to the unofficial nature of other platforms