-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Naruto Forums Revision Recruitment
- Thread starter Ryukama
- Start date
- Status
- 165,049
- 71,896
Given that it will be extremely hard for me to do my regular edit monitoring work if too many non-staff members get involved, and there seem to be sufficient staff members available for this, it may be best if we stick with the non-staff members that have Narutoforums accounts with over 25 posts, as we likely need their help with copying calculations to blog posts.
- 3,295
- 369
Thats fine by me. If you still need me, let me know.Antvasima said:
- 165,049
- 71,896
Also, given that I noticed some confusion elsewhere, an extremely important note for everybody involved in this project:
Do not create new Wayback Machine backups for the calculation links. That will only result in copying the current error messages.
Rather, search for the previous backups, and use the latest version that displays the calculation and related images, after first inspecting it. This will usually be from the middle of 2016, as that was when Lina Shields saved most of them.
Do not create new Wayback Machine backups for the calculation links. That will only result in copying the current error messages.
Rather, search for the previous backups, and use the latest version that displays the calculation and related images, after first inspecting it. This will usually be from the middle of 2016, as that was when Lina Shields saved most of them.
- 5,141
- 290
Well, for me it would be hard to be available with the preparation for christmas, but after that I'll be free
- 32,327
- 20,202
As I am one of the few with NF accounts, I'd rather work on making new blog posts copying the calcs than replacing links on profiles.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Let's not go against Ryukama's decisions just yet.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Not sure why this is necessary.
- 165,049
- 71,896
@Matthew
That should be fine, but somebody needs to link to the new calculation blogs in the relevant profiles as well. Also, let's wait for Ryukama to reply first.
@Kepekley23
Yes, I later noticed that you had provided working backup links in your blog. My mistake. Sorry.
That should be fine, but somebody needs to link to the new calculation blogs in the relevant profiles as well. Also, let's wait for Ryukama to reply first.
@Kepekley23
Yes, I later noticed that you had provided working backup links in your blog. My mistake. Sorry.
- 15,332
- 7,559
No, there is no problem, I just found it weird.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Alright.
I think we should divide the staff members willing to participate into teams in order to replace the links as Ryukama said. The normal users should help with the calculations that don't have Wayback Machine backups instead IMO.
I think we should divide the staff members willing to participate into teams in order to replace the links as Ryukama said. The normal users should help with the calculations that don't have Wayback Machine backups instead IMO.
- 11,484
- 7,685
- Thread starter
- #96
Here are some options.
1. The users who are copying the links into their own blogs can also replace the links.
2. We have different users to copy the links into their own blogs and different people to replace the links.
3. We focus on copying the links into their own blog for now and then after we're done with that focus on replacing the links later.
1. The users who are copying the links into their own blogs can also replace the links.
2. We have different users to copy the links into their own blogs and different people to replace the links.
3. We focus on copying the links into their own blog for now and then after we're done with that focus on replacing the links later.
- 15,332
- 7,559
Option II, methinks.
- 15,332
- 7,559
I still like what Antvasima suggested best, as this would decrease his workload.
- 11,484
- 7,685
- Thread starter
- #109
I agree with Ant on starting ASAP.
Also I'm certainly not working on any of this stuff on Christmas Eve or Christmas. I'm pretty sure others are the same.
I think starting on Wednesday or Thursday would be best still.
Also I'm certainly not working on any of this stuff on Christmas Eve or Christmas. I'm pretty sure others are the same.
I think starting on Wednesday or Thursday would be best still.
- 15,606
- 7,018
Basically what Ryu said.
- 15,332
- 7,559
I prefer Wednesday.
- 4,652
- 1,328
I probably won't be able to participate a whole lot because I plan to really hit the books this week and possibly the next, but I should have some time here and there and I'll probably seek to do what I can here.
- 7,404
- 3,288
My health has worsened a bit and I will be preoccupied with work for the rest of the month. I will be free and perhaps online a lot more in January.
- 21,783
- 4,826
Hope you get well soon.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
