- 4,020
- 2,608
I don’t see the calc getting contested, nor do I see the changes having any problems.
Inb4 “outlier”
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
My Hero Academia: America Brings Upgrades/Revisions
- Thread starter TheRustyOne
- Start date
- Status
Inb4 “outlier”
- 17,150
- 26,860
- 10,740
- 16,004
Weird way to spell downplay
- 4,020
- 2,608
Every MHA feat that is above Town level is an outlier. My word is law.Weird way to spell downplay
- 6,227
- 6,500
Mapl3Sy4up
Username Only- 5,465
- 3,158
Does that happen regularly?
ÆONS
He/Him- 1,489
- 1,035
Good. This discussion is close to finishing.
- 570
- 111
That’s what I’m saying. This fandom calls everything a outlier nglWeird way to spell downplay
- 17,150
- 26,860
Trust me Ik the MCU was down at city level Thanos once before and lots of feats were outliers
- 10,740
- 16,004
Trust me Ik the MCU was down at city level Thanos once before and lots of feats were outliers
- 17,150
- 26,860
Lol should I bring up how the wiki fought against moon level roshi for years and had his moon busting as an "outlier" the answer is no LOL that'd be derailing and I'm glad those times are gone like seriously
- 8,127
- 12,354
I agree with baseline High 7-A 100% Deku and Prime All Might. Since the calc and everything has been accepted, we just have to apply this to everybody.
At least SOMETHING got accomplished here today.
At least SOMETHING got accomplished here today.
- 570
- 111
So what about the island tier feat? And the nomu who’s seen still none vaporized to smithereens
- 8,127
- 12,354
We scale them to a single missile of that feat, which is mountain level. We have no evidence they could viably survive the island level explosion or scale to it durability wise, so they only scale partially. I’m pretty sure that is mentioned in the calc and beginning of the thread.
- 570
- 111
Well that sounds about right. I believe they can scale higher becuz regardless of the level it’s still a singular missile, and it takes more than 1 to do damage on Shigaraki but hey. Everybody mountain level now I believe
- 10,740
- 16,004
I guess
Proposed Character Scaling ranges from 7-A (100 Megatons) to 7-A+ (550 MT, 640 MT [Missile Calc], & 740 MT [Heroes Rising Calc] Megatons) with High 7-A via Upscaling from the 740 MT Calc for Current 100% Deku and Prime Allmight.
- 1,616
- 1,589
- 10,740
- 16,004
- 246
- 114
ALL THIS and MHA characters still stuck at “high hypersonic”, the day if we actually leave that scale…. Bruh imma be satisfied with MHA
- 570
- 111
We’ve been past that stage my boi. Movie 3 is canon and he’s seen reacting to reflected laser beams
- 246
- 114
Lol I doubt it my boi, I haven’t seen anywhere where we’ve discussed that and even if we did I doubt It’d be accepted, if it did star and shigaraki’s feats would of been accepted already
Deleted member 11410
Guest
soo.. Prime All Might = 100% Izuku?
- 2,134
- 2,421
Yeah, I think.
- 31,214
- 27,413
Woah, hold on a second. I wasn't expecting people to actually apply the changes while I was asleep and haven't given my final thoughts yet.
I thought we were still in the process of sorting out the calcs. I said I would get back to this thread in the morning when I woke up.
@Therefir; can you undo the changes?
I thought we were still in the process of sorting out the calcs. I said I would get back to this thread in the morning when I woke up.
@Therefir; can you undo the changes?
- 9,629
- 8,663
Didn't you said you were fine with the 50/50 method? I can always undo the changes if you bring something new tomorrow, but the immense majority has already agreed with the changes.
- 31,214
- 27,413
Yeah, but a calc being evaluated and accepted doesn't mean the entire revision can go ahead without staff approval.
@Therefir; I said I was fine with the 50/50 method for that particular calc, but that doesn't mean I gave blanket approval to everything in the revision.
The changes need to be undone for now.
- 31,214
- 27,413
I apologize but I wasn't expecting people to apply the changes when I said I'd get back to the thread in the morning.
- 31,214
- 27,413
Not necessarily. Just Therefir and I should be enough.
There's just some calc things I want to sort through first, and then I want to double-check and analyze all of the scaling justifications being used.
- 246
- 114
So if it’s s not too much trouble what are all the revisions we will be adding?
Last edited:
- Status
