• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Minor Nanatsu no Taizai revisions

1,738
842
First, I point out that Galan's Speed in Calculus receives an Upgrade, since Ravensupreme added new information and achieved a Mach 3600 speed for feat.

http://animevice.boards.net/thread/1497/galan-speed-nanatsu-taizai-calculatio

Secondly, I would like to suggest that the Danafor calculation be redone by adding some values, since in the original calculation the mountains were not calculated together with the Kingdom or the fact of being a pulverization, which would make a big difference.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...-_Feel_the_power_of_the_Dragon's_Sin_of_Wrath

"Notes: we have not yet included the mountain being destructed


we have also not yet included the different forms in our scan besides the rectangle"

For example
 
Also, your second suggestion is better asked to our calculation group staff. I dont know.
 
PaChi2 said:
Is the calc accepted? If it is, In okay with this.
Yes, this is the calculation used here in the forum. Ravensupreme just did a review adding new information which made an upgrade in the calculation.
 
Dunno about the first one since the char. are already MSH+.

The second one was rejected and was stated on the calc to be unusable.
 
Dark649 said:
Dunno about the first one since the char. are already MSH+.

The second one was rejected and was stated on the calc to be unusable.
The second wasnt rejected, The two are being used here in the forum. But the second left a lot of calculable things out, so in here suggesting a revision
 
Dark649 said:
Dunno about the first one since the char. are already MSH+.

The second one was rejected and was stated on the calc to be unusable.
This upgrades them from match 1900ish to match 3600, is cool.
 
It is probably best to copy the calculation (including images) to a blog posts here (while giving credit to the original calcer), and asking the calc group to evaluate it.
 
Back
Top