- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #641
I know, I’m just putting it out there for later
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mcu 6-a and speed rough draft
- 8,997
- 9,718
- 6,900
- 8,043
I think i'd go with VIII personally, considering how destructive the attack was
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #644
Would you consider it to be higher if tha planet was bigger?
- 32,835
- 38,108
I did the math assuming the 10,000 mile diameter, and the results are still within 6-B range using Mercalli Intensity VII and VIII.
- 13,235
- 21,060
VIII, since that seemed to be the minimum intensity correlating with magnitude 7.0 or higher and the earthquake was one that would definitely qualify as a 9
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #647
We’re are you getting 10,000 miles from? He says it’s the size of the Grand Canyon times hundred. That’s like 27,700 miles or something
- 25,026
- 27,042
So 3 calc members have chosen the VIII end. So 39 teratons/6-B is accepted I suppose.
All High 6-C ratings simply get changed to 6-B
A little higher than the end I'd go with but it's fine ig.
All High 6-C ratings simply get changed to 6-B
- 25,026
- 27,042
I guess it makes sense? But we consider 1.3x to be a pretty big upscaling gap so...
Best to put it as an alternative option when you make the CRT
- 32,835
- 38,108
The 100 times thing? Pretty sure we took surface area as the primary lowball instead because the document doesn't say anything about whether it's the length or the area being multiplied with 100 when we made the cratering calc for Thor.
- 32,835
- 38,108
1.3x is a no-no for upscaling regardless of whether it's for a + tier or upscaling to the next tier. We consider 1.1x to be the true starting point.
- 25,026
- 27,042
Actually its generally 1.2x
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #654
It says it’s the size of the Grand Canyon times hundered, that should be pretty clear cut for its length or area. I thought this was a at the shaking of the planet
- 32,835
- 38,108
Pretty sure 1.2x was deemed as pushing it too much and would require some solid evidence for the attack being low-effort.
Not like it matters, even the 39.57 teraton end is too far away from that at being 1.35x away from the + rating.
- 32,835
- 38,108
Too vague without a more specified statement.
- 25,026
- 27,042
1.2x is the one I see most commonly used. And its also the unwritten standard that was decided to use last time I checked.
- 32,835
- 38,108
Unfortunately the 39.57 end is 1.35x away from the + threshold so...
- 4,643
- 5,436
Maybe we could use Thor easily destroying the Bifrost Bridge with a single lightning when it took him 10 hits with Mjölnir before, not using it as a ×10 multiplier but as a noticeable power boost. Also a weakened Hela easily destroyed Mjölnir
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #660
How is that not specific? It’s literally from the vfx team that made and designed the area. And there giving us a pretty clear cut size for this thing
- 32,835
- 38,108
Pretty sure we rejected the "Bifrost 10x" method when we upgraded him to High 6-C because that premise was sketchy as ****.
- 32,835
- 38,108
Specific size on what? Length? Area? Width? Which one?
- 4,643
- 5,436
That's why I said not to use it as a ×10 multiplier, just as a noticeable increase in his power
- 32,835
- 38,108
Even that is sketchy because Thor was paining from the fact that he would never see Jane again if he destroyed the bridge.
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #665
He litterly compares it to the Grand Canyon, that should cover all the bases
- 32,835
- 38,108
Which base is the right one to use tho?
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #667
All of them lol. If the size is compared to the Grand Canyon then I see no reason not to use its length,area or width and times it by a 100. Unless stated otherwise
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #669
Not now, we’ve barley even talked about the aether or mjolnir yet
- 4,643
- 5,436
What do we have to talk?
- 8,997
- 9,718
For the Reality Stone / Aether, I guess there is the statement of Malekith using it to destroy a whole planet in the past
- 8,997
- 9,718
I mean, Queen Maeve uses one
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #674
Aether having the power to destroy planets and consume stars, mjolnir possibly being made out of neutron star material and it surviving a supernova during its creation
- 25,026
- 27,042
- 8,997
- 9,718
- 4,643
- 5,436
We know that Mjölnir is forged from uru molten with the heat of a neutron star in Nidavellir
That statement comes from a book of mythologies, clearly not a reliable source
- 8,416
- 10,661
- Thread starter
- #678
Yes and uru is implied to be neutron star material
Why not? It’s already been confirmed that mjolnir was made in and from a dying star from other sources and Jane used sad myths in love and Thunder and they were right
- 25,026
- 27,042
Bruh who allowed this
- 8,997
- 9,718
It was brought up here:
