Hellbeast
He/Him- 5,086
- 4,531
Yes and uru is implied to be neutron star material
I'm curious what this would yield honestly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes and uru is implied to be neutron star material
I think Hela crushing it was like somewhere in tier 5. I could be wrongI'm curious what this would yield honestly
Also here’s janes vision of the aether consuming the sun
(2:15)
When was it stated that the convergence amps the aether? From what I know it only gave malkeith more rangeThis seems to be more in line with "The Convergence" Which amps the aether's power tremendously, as it was stated is was going to consume all the 9 realms over a period of time.
It's on the aether's profile.When was it stated that the convergence amps the aether? From what I know it only gave malkeith more range
I looked at the aether and malkieths profile and there’s no evidence of amping. I don’t see why considering each stone has shown to be very powerful in there own rightIt's on the aether's profile.
I am NOT going back and watching Thor the dark world to find out for sure tho.
Chalk it up to an outlier if I end up being wrong
It's on the profile, but there's no proof of it. I recently rewatched the movie (cause it really isn't THAT bad). There's no indication that it's amped. Jane then states right after "not just a planet or a star. He's going to destroy everything." Or something along those lines.It's on the aether's profile.
I am NOT going back and watching Thor the dark world to find out for sure tho.
Chalk it up to an outlier if I end up being wrong
The power stone can reignite stars as well. Indicating their power.I looked at the aether and malkieths profile and there’s no evidence of amping. I don’t see why considering each stone has shown to be very powerful in there own right
Specifically, she said "Not just on Asgard, or on a star. Malekith is going to destroy everything"It's on the profile, but there's no proof of it. I recently rewatched the movie (cause it really isn't THAT bad). There's no indication that it's amped. Jane then states right after "not just a planet or a star. He's going to destroy everything." Or something along those lines.
That's....honestly even more blatant.Specifically, she said "Not just on Asgard, or on a star. Malekith is going to destroy everything"
I didn’t know that, can you post scans for thisThe power stone can reignite stars as well. Indicating their power.
Sooooo, yeahAmplifying the weapon's impact. With each additional world, the power will increase exponentially. The effect would be universal.
Oh, we’ll we still have the plantery statement
Okay, that's far more concrete then.
Although, each additional world amplifying it could still imply it's base power is planetary. Which is backed up by the deleted scene (also the other stones have planetary statements).Okay, that's far more concrete then.
Are we finally gonna accept Ronin tanking the Moonbuster as valid?Although, each additional world amplifying it could still imply it's base power is planetary. Which is backed up by the deleted scene (also the other stones have planetary statements).
Base Ronan or with the stone? Cause Base is a little iffy. The scan doesn't specifically say he's being amped through the stone. But it's heavily implied in the movie he is.Are we finally gonna accept Ronin tanking the Moonbuster as valid?
Obviously Stone RoninBase Ronan or with the stone? Cause Base is a little iffy. The scan doesn't specifically say he's being amped through the stone. But it's heavily implied in the movie he is.
He wasBase Ronan or with the stone? Cause Base is a little iffy. The scan doesn't specifically say he's being amped through the stone. But it's heavily implied in the movie he is.
I mean, isn't that already in his profile?Obviously Stone Ronin
I meant, whether they were mentioning only the length, width or the 4926 km^2 area value that we already have for the park itself.All of them lol. If the size is compared to the Grand Canyon then I see no reason not to use its length,area or width and times it by a 100. Unless stated otherwise
And I already answered you question, what park?I meant, whether they were mentioning only the length, width or the 4926 km^2 area value that we already have for the park itself.
The Grand Canyon National Park.And I already answered you question, what park?
KLOL he means like they don't specify what is getting 100 times bigger so we assume everything times 100.I meant, whether they were mentioning only the length, width or the 4926 km^2 area value that we already have for the park itself.
Why are you just using the park and not the whole canyon?The Grand Canyon National Park.
Varying width most likely.Why are you just using the park and not the whole canyon?
Varying width of what?Varying width most likely.
277 * 18 = 4986 miles^2 or 12913.68 km^2.
So times 100 would be 1291368 km^2.
From there we can easily figure out that the length and width only need be 10 times bigger to obtain an area 100 times larger.
It's actually off by quite a bit. The calc uses 790 j/gFound this off-site 6-B Sokovia calc. Thoughts?
Damn. Well never mindIt's actually off by quite a bit. The calc uses 790 j/g
it's actually 790 j/kg
So the actual yield would be less than what we currently use.
What's to note is that he also uses vaporization.Found this off-site 6-B Sokovia calc. Thoughts?
Obviously it wasn't all vaporized but it seems that a significant portion wasWhat's to note is that he also uses vaporization.
After looking at KLOL's original calc It is stated that it would vaporize the city, why isnt that used for a portion of the calc?
I'm guessing that it was original not used because there was clearly still debris from the explosionWhat's to note is that he also uses vaporization.
After looking at KLOL's original calc It is stated that it would vaporize the city, why isnt that used for a portion of the calc?
Yeah but FRIDAY just straight up says that it will vaporize the city. This is a Direct statement from a supercomputer analyzing what would happen if thor were to hit the city at full power (Which he does). He may not have vaporized all of it but if we are to believe statements he at the very least vaporized a portion of it.I'm guessing that it was original not used because there was clearly still debris from the explosion
I get that. I'm also confused as to why vaporisation wasn't usedYeah but FRIDAY just straight up says that it will vaporize the city. This is a Direct statement from a supercomputer analyzing what would happen if thor were to hit the city at full power (Which he does). He may not have vaporized all of it but if we are to believe statements he at the very least vaporized a portion of it.
Definitely think it's wierd. But I'm also unsure whether it would heavily affect the calc.Yeah but FRIDAY just straight up says that it will vaporize the city. This is a Direct statement from a supercomputer analyzing what would happen if thor were to hit the city at full power (Which he does). He may not have vaporized all of it but if we are to believe statements he at the very least vaporized a portion of it.