Marvel Comics: Thor Immortality Type 2 Removal

[Ser_Hakim_Dayne]

Here are the only justifications for Thor's Immo 2 on his page:

• Immortality (Type 2: Kept fighting after being impaled through the chest. Survived being pierced by Phoenix Emma Frost's diamond form broken into chunks across his body. Young Thor is impaled by Gorr in the torso in several places and wounded badly but survives. Survived fighting an army of giants after losing a limb, breaking his hammer, and numerous other injuries)

There's no evidence of type 2 immortality in these scans. Superhuman stamina is enough to justify being able to fight despite mortal injuries, no need for immortality 2 for that.

 

[VeryGoofyToddler2]

I see your point, especially with just having Superhuman stamina. I'm uneasy about the needed removal here since the scans are somewhat support it though evidently, the first two scans are quite a weak point.

I assume that a lot of that reasoning being used is because the weapons or the people doing the damage aren't “normal” or “conventional” in any sense of the word. So I stand to reason with that being the reason then the ability is justified but plainly looking at it does kind of paint a different picture. Either way, I’ve read and seen plenty of Thor to warrant the rating, but, since these specific scans aren't the strongest I guess the OP is sort of right.

Stuck at a hard neutral. I prefer just using new scans for the ability rather than just removing it completely.

 

[Ser_Hakim_Dayne]

I prefer just using new scans for the ability rather than just removing it completely.

Fair

 

[Ser_Hakim_Dayne]

I see your point, especially with just having Superhuman stamina. I'm uneasy about the needed removal here since the scans are somewhat support it though evidently, the first two scans are quite a weak point.

I assume that a lot of that reasoning being used is because the weapons or the people doing the damage aren't “normal” or “conventional” in any sense of the word. So I stand to reason with that being the reason then the ability is justified but plainly looking at it does kind of paint a different picture. Either way, I’ve read and seen plenty of Thor to warrant the rating, but, since these specific scans aren't the strongest I guess the OP is sort of right.

Stuck at a hard neutral. I prefer just using new scans for the ability rather than just removing it completely.

What are the feats then?

 

[Ser_Hakim_Dayne]

Bump

 

[Phoenks]

If there are better scans, they should be presented. Otherwise, I'd just move these into the stamina section if they aren't already there. Good pain endurance, I suppose.

Agree with OP. (Not staff)