Let's explain it.
Tom DeFalco's multiverse cosmology is simply:
Fair enough. Nothing we didn't already know though. This is kind of one of the most consistent things in all of marvel, what with the Spider-man 2099 reboots and all other things.
Incompatible with our tiering system unless that room is the size of Galaxies. Then it would just be evidence of High 3-A.
Sure, but you're arguing for High 1-B.
This was probably what was meant when one of those staff members for the verse said the Celestials were actually Low 1-C. It's a shame that they weren't interested in elaborating.
This was never stated.
It's been discussed before and it's been decided that it probably shouldn't be considered relevant to the tiering system.
For one instance, it is mathematically wrong. Whether it's even numbers, whole numbers or natural numbers, their size in the degrees of infinity are all the same because their cardinality is the same. That is, you don't have to count to consider them to be superior to each other. Simple mapping will help you realize that they are all the same size.
Even putting them into power sets the way they did prove that they are the same level of infinity (that is, countable) since they are ordered into power sets which would make them ordinals which are not bigger, just ordered. Even infinite*infinite (or infinite sets of infinity) as depicted here or being transfinite levels of infinity beyond low 2-C (or rather, 2-A characters since they're about equal to MM and Beyonder who were affecting the multiverse) characters is still just 2-A.
A common misconception tbh. The stated planes aren't higher, or anything, they just exist in their own separate space-time continuum (unless proven otherwise).
However, the hyperspace is likened to a higher dimension. I'm neutral in regards to this scan, leaning closer to disagree. The planes of existence were never extrapolated on.
Seth himself states that his attack was to corrupt the
transdimensional integrity of Yggdrasil that existed on every plane of reality.
So, looking up the definition of transdimensional I learned it can mean more than the three dimensions of space or being multidimensional, both of which are not enough to claim something is High 1-B.
Trans can mean beyond, but it can also mean across, the latter making more sense as Yggdrasil exists across every plane of reality. Not enough evidence to qualify for High 1-B here.
You shouldn't tag staff. Only staff can do so.
In summary 2A is safer but I wouldn't be opposed to Low 1-C either. I disagree with High 1-B.