? When you got enough staff support? Where glass agreed? Plancks explicitly said he want to hear more opinions on it and the thread I've created is not to change the standard, read properly, it's to change the poor wording to something that makes it look more understandable for ppl who are misunderstanding it as smth that contradicts the definition.
With your CRT, MGK keeps it's High Godly, don't worry
They're literally still waiting on DT's amendments to the rule. We will have to wait and see what those changes are and if MG will still qualify under them. There's no guarantee of that happening.
I said if Glass agrees, which I just assumed because he's argued on my behalf a few times in this thread. The point remains that we have a staff majority.
DT already replied XD
Fuji, what is point of applying right now? Like your whole thread is dependent on reina's thread.
Plancks, as it's confirmed that we don't have much clarification regarding Type 3 and it's obvious enough that it being equal to Type 2 or 1 was just poor wording and it's just have to be more fundamental than soul, can you clear your stance once again?
Yeah, and people are asking for elaboration from him so they know what changes will be made. The page is definitely getting changed, we just don't know what it'll be changed to.
A thread shouldn't be delayed just because of another, adjacent thread. The changes can always be reverted if Reiner's thread makes HGR valid again.
This was never agreed upon so idk what the hell you're talking about.
and i have seen more bruhh,
Why are you rushing when Plank vote literally stands on DT response. At this point you are just desperate.
Rushing is when you wait for the grace period to end? wack
Planck has to clarify with this downgrade once more. As he already agreed with DarkGrath points which is similar to MGK case, so I suggest you to wait till his input again.
Source is one's most fundamental aspect of existence besides mind, body and soul, one can restore soul and other things but if source destroyed, it's the end. They can't be resurrected. That meets the definition of HGR.
I am pretty sure a thread needs to be open for 48 hours. It just seems you are too biased towards your Downgrade that's all. Literally all of the staff in that thread Disagrees with your interpretation. So stop.
The argument in favor of HGR is that the source is a fundamental concept, existing deeper than the mind and soul, therefore making it a fundamental aspect of oneself.
Dread, I am literally waiting for the grace period at minimum, that is not rushing. The other thread hasn't concluded yet and we don't know how the standards will change yet. You are just assuming MG will still qualify, and while it very well might, we should not reject a downgrade on the basis that it could become wrong later.
What the hell does it mean for something to be as hard to regenerate as a type 1 or 2 concept?
IT is exactly the issue, EVEN DT who created this line admits it's vague and it will be changed. The standards is literally under revision
You would have to ask whoever wrote the page.
DT said Mid Godly Regeneration shouldn't be able to Bring back Fundamental Concepts that's enough to qualify for HGR.
If this was how it worked then nobody would ever be allowed to make tier 1 or tier 2 revisions, because those standards change every other week :v
The one who wrote it will change it according to reina draft which makes this thread meaningless
Fuji, this is worst argument ever since this exact thread is about your wrong interpretation that you could not even explain it yourself
We don't know that yet. Come back when the changes have been actually applied, and we can look at the new standards together. But stop pretending the new standards will invariably take your side here.
I understand what it means. You not understanding it isn't my problem.
When I can argue that it just being more fundamental aspect of one's existence can as well, be equally valid as per our standards? When you yourself cannot be sure what our standard mean, then basis of downgrade doesn't even stands.
You understand what? Literally the one who wrote it said himself it is vague and he prefer reina one. Oh my god this became childish
Exactly she literally said this
Even Planck said this thread is not valid according to that thread.
Even as per our standard currently given how vague it is, it can be interpreted in the way I said without contradicting anything while yours does and makes it look vague, that said, it doesn't have any basis to proceed from here on.
