Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you. So Acausality Type 4 and Concept Manip Type 1 is okay?Eseseso makes sense to me.
Looks like so.Thank you. So Acausality Type 4 and Concept Manip Type 1 is okay?
Oh definitely.Thank you. So Acausality Type 4 and Concept Manip Type 1 is okay?
I will reply to this, after I have finished my holiday.I disagree with Type 5 Acausality, as being before/above time is just Type 4 (ask @Theglassman12), but the rest looks good.
From what I can tell, everything looks good EXCEPT Type 2 Acausality, as nothing suggests that they lack a past and future.Minor Typing correction
So as it turned out, my typing for the Acausality described here is incorrect. Thanks to DDM for helping out there.
As noted in the prior revision, changes to both past AND future have no effect on the present for the setting of the Legendarium and all its characters (due to the únat/Laws imposed by Eru).
This would thus be Acausality (Type 2)
The Ainur abilities page
After a few months of compiling and checking over sources, I do believe I can present a largely complete draft for the Powers and Abilities of the Ainur.
Draft
vsbattles.fandom.com
Now, to summarize, this page is meant to be a compilation for the general abilities of every member of the Angelic race within the Legendarium known as the Ainur. As such, certain abilities that are seemingly unique or at least not specified are not included.
Moreover, there is mention of the LotR magical system, something which does not have a page yet. This likely will not be an extensive page if it is ever made (The Legendarium is famous for its "Soft Magic" afterall, so it's fairly nebulous it terms of hard rules) and if it is not made, the appropriate abilities will be mentioned on relevant pages. In the case of the Ainur, this will be pretty much all of them for reasons noted in the draft, but it is still something not 100% unique to them so the specifics will not be mentioned.
Abilities such as Concept Manipulation, Fate Manipulation, and Acausality are already accepted. The justifications and references for all other abilities are detailed in the draft.
There is one point that confounds me though. Does the example of Baldur from God of War mean cases of absolute immortality (truly unkillable within the verse) mean that all offensive abilities are resisted to an extent?
The Type 2 was from the Universal Resistances revision. I just included it since it applies to all characters, not just Ainur.From what I can tell, everything looks good EXCEPT Type 2 Acausality, as nothing suggests that they lack a past and future.
Oh wait, did you mean the typing change?From what I can tell, everything looks good EXCEPT Type 2 Acausality, as nothing suggests that they lack a past and future.
Aight then.Oh wait, did you mean the typing change?
That's Type 2 because changes to either past or future have no effect on LotR characters. Type 1 is just changes to the past.
Type 2 is right according to DDM.
Btw, excellent job on the sandbox.Oh wait, did you mean the typing change?
That's Type 2 because changes to either past or future have no effect on LotR characters. Type 1 is just changes to the past.
Type 2 is right according to DDM.
Looks good to me.Minor Typing correction
So as it turned out, my typing for the Acausality described here is incorrect. Thanks to DDM for helping out there.
As noted in the prior revision, changes to both past AND future have no effect on the present for the setting of the Legendarium and all its characters (due to the únat/Laws imposed by Eru).
This would thus be Acausality (Type 2)
The Ainur abilities page
After a few months of compiling and checking over sources, I do believe I can present a largely complete draft for the Powers and Abilities of the Ainur.
Draft
vsbattles.fandom.com
Now, to summarize, this page is meant to be a compilation for the general abilities of every member of the Angelic race within the Legendarium known as the Ainur. As such, certain abilities that are seemingly unique or at least not specified are not included.
Moreover, there is mention of the LotR magical system, something which does not have a page yet. This likely will not be an extensive page if it is ever made (The Legendarium is famous for its "Soft Magic" afterall, so it's fairly nebulous it terms of hard rules) and if it is not made, the appropriate abilities will be mentioned on relevant pages. In the case of the Ainur, this will be pretty much all of them for reasons noted in the draft, but it is still something not 100% unique to them so the specifics will not be mentioned.
Abilities such as Concept Manipulation, Fate Manipulation, and Acausality are already accepted. The justifications and references for all other abilities are detailed in the draft.
There is one point that confounds me though. Does the example of Baldur from God of War mean cases of absolute immortality (truly unkillable within the verse) mean that all offensive abilities are resisted to an extent?
Looks good to me.
Thank you both as usual. Sorry if this interrupted your vacation Ant.This seems fine to me as well.
I did think about that, but the main issue with that is that's a lot of scans for each individual reference since I use each one twice or more and not each one is from the same paragraph.You should probably add scans rather than only references, it's already a lot of text to parse and it's not feasible to go and check every single thing referenced to examine it
Thanks. I'll add them once I get some spare time (had to burn the candle to get it out that quick).should be good
i don't know a lot of this stuff 100%, at a glance yes thoThanks. I'll add them once I get some spare time (had to burn the candle to get it out that quick).
Do you think the given justifications are okay at least?
Well tier 0 is still being debated.What about the new Tiering System revision, can it be applied to revise fictional cosmology, if so, maybe we should discuss LotR cosmology
While not an unreasonable change by any means, they weren't discussed recently.Are the following changes acceptable, or should they be reverted?
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Ancalagon_the_Black?type=revision&diff=8391013&oldid=8337739
I suppose if the person who made the changes would present their arguments on here, that would be good.Okay. So what would you suggest as a solution then?
Also, I reverted the edits I linked to above.
Ah, well I suppose I'll look into the matter and bring it up as part of my next revision proposal.Hsharpe does not seem to have an accepted account in our forum.
No problem! I gave GarrianXD a message, just waiting on these.Thank you for helping out.
Should be done. I formatted the pages into tabs since pages like Sauron and Gandalf's are beginning to get cluttered.I have unlocked those pages for you. Tell me here when you are done.