RandomGuy2345
He/Him- 24,710
- 15,250
Agree to disagree.WWE are no way closer to fiction.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree to disagree.WWE are no way closer to fiction.
Post Rollins crushing Fiends Skull in Hell in the cell ppv match and fiend getting up unharmed from Hell in aAgree to disagree.
My apologies for constantly clogging up the thread, but why are we only counting staff votes?Remove: Mr. Bambu, Deagonx (Logan, leaning towards it for WWE as a whole), Damage3245, Flashlight237 (Both Logan and the verse), Maverick_Zero_X
Keep: Qawsedf234 (Including Logan Paul), Tllmbrg (Ok with Keeping Logan), Agnaa, LephyrTheRevanchist, KingTempest (Neutral on Logan), Armorchopy (Neutral on Logan)
Neutral/Don't Care: ByAsura. Antvasima (Leaning towards keep WWE, with the note that he would prefer that the Wrestler's closer to Reality than Fiction be Purged (This would of course, include Logan Paul))
So we have 6 staff that want WWE to be kept here on the wiki, and we now have 5 staff who oppose to it, with Ant willing to keep WWE as long as the wrestlers that are closer to reality than fiction are purged, which would include Logan Paul.
because staff are the only ones with evaluation rights for CRT's.My apologies for constantly clogging up the thread, but why are we only counting staff votes?
Yeah, yeah. Staff opinions matter the most in the long run, but this is a Content Revision Thread with no specific restrictions, so why are all of the blue users who voted for either side not counted here?
It's not the matter of what opinions matter, it's the matter of who's votes tip the scales, which are only Thread, Admin, and BureauMy apologies for constantly clogging up the thread, but why are we only counting staff votes?
Yeah, yeah. Staff opinions matter the most in the long run, but this is a Content Revision Thread with no specific restrictions, so why are all of the blue users who voted for either side not counted here?
Then get out of hereAs is natural, blue names do not matter in the slightest and may as well not exist on CRTs
Said the blue nameThen get out of here
Said the blue nameSaid the blue name
Said the blue nameSaid the blue name
The rule against stage personas seems intended to disallow profiles that are for characters performed by the real-life equivalent of that character, and who either:
- Have little to no impact on the actual story of something with one (guest features on TV shows).
- Exist in a partially-fictionalised presentation (educational TV shows and YouTube videos, certain music videos).
These seem to be the current suggestions, which I think seem reasonable, although if characters do not break the other rules, meaning if they are much closer to fiction than reality, I do not personally mind if versus matches are created for them.So what should we allow?
Obviously, we still need standards, because this still edges a little close to pages we wouldn't allow. Here's a short list of
-Total ban on VS discussions, or any extension of "who would win" discussions regarding stage personas.
-Characters must have actually notable feats that go well beyond what the actor they're played by can do.
-Characters must have an original story or setting, one that isn't just a reflection of their real life.
For clarity, have you gone back on your stance regarding characters that share a 1:1 name to their real lives, or do you consider the bit about "Characters must have an original story or setting, one that isn't just a reflection of their real life." to be fulfilling that personal requirement?These seem to be the current suggestions, which I think seem reasonable, although if characters do not break the other rules, meaning if they are much closer to fiction than reality, I do not personally mind if versus matches are created for them.
I extremely strongly agree with this point toosnip
Let’s gooo Scott the woz profile can be realThese seem to be the current suggestions, which I think seem reasonable, although if characters do not break the other rules, meaning if they are much closer to fiction than reality, I do not personally mind if versus matches are created for them.
If mine go through, then no, it wouldn't.Let’s gooo Scott the woz profile can be real
THE AVGN! THE AVGN IS REAL!These seem to be the current suggestions, which I think seem reasonable, although if characters do not break the other rules, meaning if they are much closer to fiction than reality, I do not personally mind if versus matches are created for them.
Remove: Mr. Bambu, Deagonx (Logan, leaning towards it for WWE as a whole), Damage3245, Flashlight237 (Both Logan and the verse), Maverick_Zero_X
Keep: Qawsedf234 (Including Logan Paul), Tllmbrg (Ok with Keeping Logan), Agnaa, LephyrTheRevanchist, KingTempest (Neutral on Logan), Armorchopy (Neutral on Logan)
Neutral/Don't Care: ByAsura. Antvasima (Leaning towards keep WWE, with the note that he would prefer that the Wrestler's closer to Reality than Fiction be Purged (This would of course, include Logan Paul))
So we have 6 staff that want WWE to be kept here on the wiki, and we now have 5 staff who oppose to it, with Ant willing to keep WWE as long as the wrestlers that are closer to reality than fiction are purged, which would include Logan Paul.
Honestly, this discussion is now becoming about stage personas as a whole, there is alrwady a staff thread for that, so it would be better to finish that one before discussing if wwe should be removed or not, since it would depend entirely on our stage persona rulesWell, we have decided to remove Logan Paul, but I do not know if my conclusions regarding the wrestling verse as a whole have been accepted, although maybe we should handle that in the other related discussion thread here.
Yes. Is it fine if I close this thread and we continue there instead?Honestly, this discussion is now becoming about stage personas as a whole, there is alrwady a staff thread for that, so it would be better to finish that one before discussing if wwe should be removed or not, since it would depend entirely on our stage persona rules
Yes.Yes. Is it fine if I close this thread and we continue there instead?
I would say that yesYes. Is it fine if I close this thread and we continue there instead?