Bobsican
He/Him- 21,628
- 6,273
- Thread starter
- #41
Eh, the whole definition of a Nobody is someone that lacks a heart to begin with, I've already gone in-depth of how NEP is basically the defining trait of a Nobody in the first place, as otherwise they wouldn't be a Nobody to begin with, a physiology being temporary is irrelevant for indexing purposes as much we often allow characters having whole keys dedicated to stat amps, transformations and so on, even for way less time at that.@Bobsican So you’re proving my point even more that it’s situational, meaning they don’t have NEP the full time since they get their hearts back.
Ok so NEP is just flat out not happening then if they don’t lack a physical form.
Yes, you’re trying to say someone’s simultaneously existing and non existing, and also that they’re neither, this contradicts itself completely as you can’t have one with the other.
The current standards in the NEP page do allow for NEP even if the character isn't incorporeal so long they qualify for type 3. I've already gone into the OP on how multiple types of NEP is a thing allowed on the site, and NEP as a whole is a paradoxical power, it doesn't have to make sense on that regard.
Thanks for the evaluation in a vacuum, it's on point.Here's my evaluation, note I'm not knowledgeable about this series so if there's any contextual mistakes about it then that's why.
Also take a shot when the words "nonexistence" or "nonexistent" shows up.
After reading through the OP, my understanding of what’s being discussed right now is that Bobiscan’s arguing that a character named Naime is considered to be more nonexistent compared to already nonexistent entities like Nobodies, through lacking virtually all qualities that Nobodies have, and being considered a “non-being” in the purest form of the word, even when compared to Nobodies. Implying a level of nonexistence that’s more nonexistent than beings which lack existential qualities.
Because of this supposed “deeper” level of nonexistence, Bobsican’s arguing it should be considered as NEP (Nature: Type 2) as Type 2 denotes a level of nonexistence that’s beyond the general binary code of 1 and 0’s, with 1 describing existence and 0 describing nonexistence. Which in our case would be Naime being considered more nonexistent than beings who would be described, in binary code, as 0’s.
Well, first and foremost NEP (Nature: Type 1) seems fine, there's a multitude of statements that imply Nobodies lack physical existence entirely, with them being stated to be "nonexistent" beings, embodiments of "emptiness" that exist as beings of "nothingness", they've lost physical form after losing fundamental aspects about their existence, such as their "hearts". With physical attacks phasing through their bodies as if they didn’t exist.
Now, as for NEP (Nature: Type 2), the logic behind it makes sense within a vacuum, Naime’s implied to be more nonexistent compared to already nonexistent entities (with her being a “non-being” even when compared to Nobodies). Which would qualify Type 2 imo as Type 2 denotes a level of nonexistence above general nonexistence, if you’re more nonexistent than something which doesn’t exist, you would fulfill that prerequisite of “nonexistence that’s more nonexistent than regular nonexistence” for Type 2.
But there’s potentially a problem if Naime’s an actual physical entity in the sense of possessing a physical body (made of matter, not just having physicality). Because if she’s still made of physical matter, but acts like she isn’t, then that would just be a higher form of Type 3, not her having Type 2 since Type 2 necessarily requires the entity in question to be intangible, to be without physical existence. But I'm without that context so I can’t really comment on it. If she doesn’t have a physical body, Type 2’s fine imo, but if she does, then layered Type 3 (without Type 1) makes more sense.
Transduality is dependent on if she’s Type 2 or not, if she’s Type 2 then Transduality seems fine since she would be above the dual concepts of light and darkness that Nobodies exist between, but if she is only Type 3, then I disagree with Transduality.
The series never goes too much into that topic IIRC, what'd be the default with the context given so far?It's possible to have both, just extremely rare.
Like you can be more nonexistent than nonexistence on a physical level (which would quality for Type 2), but you could still have a existing mind, soul etc, that acts like it's nonexistent (which would quality for Type 3).
In any case, looking at the NEP page, behaving like someone with type 1 NEP is the minimal for type 2 beyond the extra criteria of being considered even less existencial, being "fully" incorporeal isn't a requirement per-say as said before if the character qualifies for type 3, as quoted at the start of the OP:
The physical body of every character with this ability has to be nonexistent. That means that users always are Incorporeal, unless maybe they physically qualify for Paradoxical Nonexistence.