I know you read when I said "don't limit the characters to just feats". So I'm ignoring this.
And I explained that feats are the main way we scale characters so you can ignore it but it doesnt change anything.
Overall he is the strongest curse, in every aspect he is better, he dominates their abilities with his physicals alone, similar to what Gojo did to the trial meteor.
In every aspect he is better yes, it doesnt mean he can tank everything they can throw at him. He hasnt dominated every ability with physicals alone unless you have a feat or statement for that.
Him thinking that does not mean he can win based off ap alone. You and me both know Gojo being the strongest sorcerer is haxed based and his manipulation of curse energy.
I never said he does win via ap alone, yet he still hasnt been able to destroy any of the fingers even with said abilities. So we can agree on Gojo's strength being hax based at least we are going somewhere.
Also Gojo likely says that not because he thinks he can beat him but because he wants to give Yuji a sense of assurance that even if Yuji fails in his mission to stop Sukuna, Gojo will do it.
You are just saying that there is no proof of this. As far as I know Gojo doesnt lie to anyone. Doesnt mean he couldnt be wrong but he is confident that he could beat a full power sukuna and nothing says otherwise so far. Sukuna who could here him did not deny it either. Else he would have outright stated that Gojo was wrong to cause Itadori even more despair.
Sukuna wasn't "defeated" he died from unknown circumstances as far as we know, unless the fanbook says something else which if it does pls send.
Good point, I do remember it being said he was defeated somehow but maybe I was wrong, doesnt change my core points though.
"It's that powerful of a curse" he's admitting here he's not strong enough to destroy them, nothing even alludes to it being due to hax.
How does that stop it from being hax, power relates to hax too.
Once again, you can not say he's the strongest due to his abilities, where is that implied that he's considered strongest because of his cutting abilities and domain and poison resistance and etc?
Literally all we have is that he is the most powerful curse. Which can be due to a myriad of things and a combination of all of them. It doesnt say he is the physically strongest curse. Or that no one can damage him in any way. Or anything like that and he even admits that he can be damaged (though yes he was not at full power).
Dude you said "this is vsbw feats>statements>>>>>>>narrative. Seems a bit handwavey when you could've said why you yourself think that, not use the website to justify yourself.
Yes I said that as a part of a big argument. I also said why I myself think that, not quite sure what you are trying to say with this. I have explained multiple times in this thread why I think people scale the way I think they do. This quote also applies to how I view fictional chars and their powers in general. In fact I was wrong saying this is vsbw. This is how things are done in general and I agree with it.
Sorry... But, what? The poles/buildings are clearly moved in the scene and just weren't harmed because of the reinforcement. A building with reinforcement does not gain damage of a magnitude 5
You know that with the fight directly below them, that the buildings above would have to shake a bit right? All we see is that they vibrate a little.