JoJo High 3-A (Or 3-A idk) Upgrade

[Planck69]

It is exactly what it means. The stated timeframe is explicitly stated to being 1 hour back into the past where a portion of time is being affected for a specific timeframe.

Then again, that is how I see it.

It is not truly affecting the past completely, but rather specifically targeting a specific timeframe for BTD already been in use to revert the events back to 1 hour ago.

.....All well and dandy but this doesn't really affect what's being discussed. The entire reason that this took 2 pages is that a finite amount of time still has enough instances of the 3-dimensional universe that it's above High 3-A but technically below Low 2-C.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Ya. It makes absolutely since why it is not low 2-C. There is a finite amount of time...

 

[Aachintya31]

Huh? Since when do you need to destroy a whole 4D universe to be low 2-C, alone effecting space-time is enough for low 2-C

Since tier low 2c revision

 

[ImmortalDread]

Since tier low 2c revision

Alright

 

[KLOL506]

Since tier low 2c revision

No, that's been a thing since forever. You need to affect/destroy/**** up every last bit of the timeline to be Low 2-C, all of the past, present and future, not just one singular section in time.

 

[ImmortalDread]

No, that's been a thing since forever. You need to affect/destroy/**** up every last bit of the timeline to be Low 2-C, all of the past, present and future, not just one singular section in time.

or just affect the whole 4D universe lol

 

[KLOL506]

or just affect the whole 4D universe lol

Same thing

 

[ImmortalDread]

Same thing

I know, just saying that not all authors need to state it explicitly.

 

[Sus]

Wiki standards do suck sometimes

 

[KLOL506]

I know, just saying that not all authors need to state it explicitly.

Never said we needed them to.

 

[Aachintya31]

No, that's been a thing since forever. You need to affect/destroy/**** up every last bit of the timeline to be Low 2-C, all of the past, present and future, not just one singular section in time.

Ok i didn't knew that

 

[It_is_i_wyatt]

still not sure how its not low 2-C but it doesnt really matter, maybe i just dont actually know the niche specifics of the tier

 

[ZillertheBucko]

it's high 3-A, or at least it should be if wiki standards weren't stupid

 

[Chariot190]

キラークイーン第3の爆弾で、他人にとりつくスタンドだ。 本体・吉良吉影に関する質問をした相手を自動的に爆破、吉良が解除しない限リスタンド効果は続く。 また、本体が追い詰められると「時間を1時間だけ吹き飛ばす」という真の能力を発動させる。
It is the third bomb of Killer Queen, a Stand that attaches itself to others. It automatically blows up anyone who asks questions about the main body, Yoshikage Kira, and the effect of the Stand will continue unless Kira deactivates it. When the main body is cornered, it activates its true ability to 「Blow up/away time for 1 hour」.
Another one I didn't have time to add to the CRT, this one is from Shueisha Jump Remix: Vol. 17 Harvest in a column explaining the origin of Stand names, which happens to feature an explanation of what they do.

A bit shoddy of a translation (as in I slapped that bad boy through DeepL and just fixed the obvious **** ups) as I haven't really had time to ask bit a lot of the characters used are the same.
That's 3 different sources fyi, the original manga, guide and explanatory column explaining that Killer Queen is named after Killer Queen

Anyway I'm pretty sure this has long been accepted, I've started working on the sandbox.

 

[Reiner04]

High 3A exists for this reason and High 2B doesn't exists for the same reason. Low 2-C a no no according to current standards. High 3A is fine.

Going with revised version of high 3a, funnily it is low 2c and as low 2c itself is not revised yet, it is not low 2c as per current definition.
You see where this is now?

 

[Reiner04]

I was just waiting for something like this

 

[Reiner04]

High 3A exists for this reason and High 2B doesn't exists for the same reason. Low 2-C a no no according to current standards. High 3A is fin

Lmao, you shouldn't have pointed it out in the revision thread, this crt can go funny rn with revised high 3a version.

 

[Aachintya31]

Lmao, you shouldn't have pointed it out in the revision thread, this crt can go funny rn with revised high 3a version.

I did now

 

[Reiner04]

What are arguments for low 2-C anyway?

Current definition of high 3a is funnily allows any finite amount of time destroyed along time axis to be low 2c. But the guy just pointed it out in revision thread when it was going good.

 

[Planck69]

Just make 3-A+ or something smh...

In all seriousness, what was the final tier we agreed upon? "At least High 3-A, likely far higher" or something else?

 

[Reiner04]

I did now

Anyway, current low 2c is flawed, so in the upcoming thread low 2c will be revised to any finite amount of time between 0 to infinity.

 

[Reiner04]

Just make 3-A+ or something smh...

In all seriousness, what was the final tier we agreed upon? "At least High 3-A, likely far higher" or something else?

The Tier Don't exist low 2c is about to revised given that revised version of high 3a itself implies that directly.

 

[Arnoldstone18]

Just make 3-A+

This sounds cursed

 

[HammerStrikes219]

Just make 3-A+ or something smh...

In all seriousness, what was the final tier we agreed upon? "At least High 3-A, likely far higher" or something else?

That is what it looking like for now.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Just make 3-A+ or something smh...

 

[ImmortalDread]

Current definition of high 3a is funnily allows any finite amount of time destroyed along time axis to be low 2c. But the guy just pointed it out in revision thread when it was going good.

Pain and some others will make tiering system revisions soon.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Just make 3-A+ or something smh...

In all seriousness, what was the final tier we agreed upon? "At least High 3-A, likely far higher" or something else?

Yap. This is a good solution.

 

[Reiner04]

Pain and some others will make tiering system revisions soon.

High 3a revisions has already ended which by default gives anyone who destroys any finite part of timeline from 0 to infinity a low 2c rating.

 

[Reiner04]

I am not sure though how many of mods has noticed it but likely firestorm already know it.

 

[ImmortalDread]

High 3a revisions has already ended which by default gives anyone who destroys any finite part of timeline from 0 to infinity a low 2c rating.

There will be one soon in the future.

 

[Reiner04]

There will be one soon in the future.

Yes

 

[Shey]

High 3a revisions has already ended which by default gives anyone who destroys any finite part of timeline from 0 to infinity a low 2c rating.

So this BTD now perfectly qualifies for Low 2-C, yes?

 

[HammerStrikes219]

'Tier 2 Requirements and Examples Revision'
https://vsbattles.com/threads/tier-2-requirements-and-examples-revision.124078/post-5096432

No

 

[HammerStrikes219]

High 3a revisions has already ended which by default gives anyone who destroys any finite part of timeline from 0 to infinity a low 2c rating.

That wasn’t stated. Just want to point out that will been discussed.

https://vsbattles.com/threads/tier-2-requirements-and-examples-revision.124078/post-5137251

 

[ImmortalDread]

Stop derailing, it is irrelevant right now.

I think many staff members agreed with this: "At least High 3-A, likely far higher", so can we apply?

 

[Chariot190]

Stop derailing, it is irrelevant right now.

I think many staff members agreed with this: "At least High 3-A, likely far higher", so can we apply?

If that's what we're going with I'll add it to the sandbox.

 

[Reiner04]

So this BTD now perfectly qualifies for Low 2-C, yes?

After the revision will be done, yes.

 

[It_is_i_wyatt]

'Tier 2 Requirements and Examples Revision'
https://vsbattles.com/threads/tier-2-requirements-and-examples-revision.124078/post-5096432

No

dont understand this at all but if thats what we're doing then ok i guess

 

[HigashikataJobin]

Agree for high 3-A

 

[DivineAura44]

Was this ever finished?