Is this enough for nonduality nature 1 aspect 1 or something else ?

[G33kedzinx]

As seen above, chaos is described as something more than man or monster
Shouldn’t this fall under the category of Specific Nonduality ? because it suggests that chaos exists independently of the dualistic distinctions between man and monster, presenting chaos as a concept beyond such distinctions as he was described as a fairy tail.

 

[Astral_Trinity439]

First off, Nonduality is no longer divided into separately mentioned aspect and nature types, its just "Types", Specific, General, and Plurality
Secondly, Is there a directly stated or at least implied duality between "Man" and "Monster"? And Man, Monster, and Chaos, conceptual in nature?
If yes, than it could quality
If not, than just no

 

[Grxseongjii]

As seen above, chaos is described as something more than man or monster
Shouldn’t this fall under the category of Specific Nonduality ? because it suggests that chaos exists independently of the dualistic distinctions between man and monster, presenting chaos as a concept beyond such distinctions as he was described as a fairy tail.

I don't even find any indication of duality, there's just the state that chaos is neither a man nor a monster, even to make chaos look like a fundamental, it seems lacking.

The conclusion is that it cannot be classified as nonduality

 

[G33kedzinx]

I don't even find any indication of duality, there's just the state that chaos is neither a man nor a monster, even to make chaos look like a fundamental, it seems lacking.

The conclusion is that it cannot be classified as nonduality

I posted this shit a month ago and I got better scans for ND and abstract existence now anyways

 

[G33kedzinx]

First off, Nonduality is no longer divided into separately mentioned aspect and nature types, its just "Types", Specific, General, and Plurality
Secondly, Is there a directly stated or at least implied duality between "Man" and "Monster"? And Man, Monster, and Chaos, conceptual in nature?
If yes, than it could quality
If not, than just no

Rather than categorizing as man and monster, the verse actually treats it as a dichotomy of good and evil, light and darkness and so on. But yes chaos was depicted as being nothing more than a concept who can partially manifest by taking control of negative emotions.

 

[Astral_Trinity439]

Rather than categorizing as man and monster, the verse actually treats it as a dichotomy of good and evil, light and darkness and so on. But yes chaos was depicted as being nothing more than a concept who can partially manifest by taking control of negative emotions.

This just seems more like that "Hey, that being is not good or evil, he doesn't even have emotions nor takes side, his only purpose is to destroy" or something like that

But eh, if it involves good-evil or light-darkness than this seems more like the Chinese ying-yang duality stuff, if that's the case, I suppose Nonduality is possible. Now for which type it is, would depend on context