So you're saying demons are nondual?
No? How did you come to that conclusion?
Also, seems there was also a misinterpretation on my part, I'll clarify that in the comment after this
Every duality needs to be encompass reality, even for type 1 dualities. This is proof that you don’t understand Glassman’s Quote
Read the message, seriously..... Glassman literally clarified it doesn't need "every duality" to exist in the verse, Ying-Yang can be the general duality when given enough context
A concept that does not govern reality cannot be a Type 2/1 concept
Neither did I said it was Type 1 or 2
Chapter 400, as I said, is a completely different context. It has already been made clear from the downgrade thread, Mobius System does not even have conceptual manipulation. In Afterstories, Veldora did not survive the destruction of the Universe caused by the Mobius System, he suppressed the Mobius System with his Aura which can affect the Laws of the World and covers the whole World.
1-
Veldora won't be affected even if the World is destroyed
2- Except, the only chapters were "Negative energy" are explained are Chapter 206, and Chapter 398~400
3- Did I say Mobius System had conceptual manipulation? I am referring to Negative energy in general, not Mobius system in specific
I updated the scan in my own image, but it is not updated here. The World was already destroyed and Rimuru was not affected at the end of space-time, Beelzebub was useless on it anyway. But the Beelzebub that brought the end of the spacetime of a single universe as indicated in the scans would not have affected the parallel universes and the underworld that Veldanava created by shaping the primordial world anyway, so we cannot say that it really affected the Great Spirits. The destruction of all energy in the OP would only be valid if Beelzebub had destroyed the entire Primordial World.
Separate the parts where you are referring to Chapter 248, and the part where you are referring to the after stories, in this para.
Glassman's comment means only that there is hope that the Holy Spirit may have Nonduality Type 2, nothing more.
If you're still not convinced, I'll just ask Glassman the other part as well....
Yin and yang that mention in that scan just fot describe the nature of light and darkness, that why rimuru even have ND 1. It not for describe everything is in the system of yin and yang (duality), just light and dark that operated in that system
Your example just show how duality in type 2 is mean all of duality. In that two example, you can see that yin and yang not only describe some aspect in reality like what tensura do, but yin and yang become system that every aspect of world are operate in that system
No, that quote is false. All duality mean all duality. We even have thread that discussed about that
Not general duality
All this becomes irrelevant because a staff has already
approved that in this case Ying-Yang can be general duality
Also, are you claiming what the staff said is wrong?
Your point in OP is absurd, there are no "neither state" because you only prove something that not a duality but not prove it still in the system of duality.
And you missunderstand what "both state" mean. It not mean you exist as the two thing but exist as the united of the two thing
Indivisible wholeness is not the only way to be both states -_-
Yeah void energy not a idea/concept of nothing, so being lack of that is not give you NEP 2 at all
You need nothingness that lack idea of nothing, not just lack of nothing
there is nothing on the definition page suggesting NEP2 is the "Idea of the lack of nothing"
Idealistic Nonexistence: The character doesn't exist in a sense further beyond conventional nonexistence. In terms of binary, this would be something that is neither 1 nor 0, where 1 is existence and 0 is nonexistence. These characters often have some form of
Nonduality due to their lack of binary existence. Characters of this type have to behave at least as nonexistent as those with Material Nonexistence, but might display even further showings such as preceding or opposing existence.
So yeah, there's nothing here stating "lack the idea of nothingness", that's something you're basing from yourself, and you debunked nothing