This is absurd
Firstly, for have a duality. You must prove the two thing is not only contradict but also connected with each other. If one of the two vanished then the other thing get "vanished", because the two thing is define each other. One cannot exist if the other one dont
Second, for have type 2, you must have all normal concept that govern reality being a duality
And there are no in your proof that say that, yeah it say yin and yang, but it just fot light and darkness (bruh this already discussed in two thread and being rejected as far as i remember)
And there are no type 3 here. Bruhh.... not all both and neither state is 3 and 4 truth state, is only for duality state.
- "Lacking duality" or "not a duality" is not make you in neither state of duality. Concept law or information or plot by default is not a duality, but it not make them in the state of neither of duality. You must have some abstract thing that still connected to the system of duality, but in a state where it not a duality. A expansion system of duality
- For both of duality state, it mean you must have some abstract thing that mixed the duality into one state. Not exist as the two thing/duality
.........
And NEP 2, well just prove that nothingness doeasnt have even a nothingness, or a nothingness that lack of nothingness/idea of nothingness. Just some nothingness that more nothing will not make you have NEP 2